U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
January 08, 2008 07:57 PM UTC
8 Comments
When Coffman was co-opting Ken Gordon’s message regarding the need for a post-partisan SoS. The Coffman supporters assuring us that Mike was a good, ethical, honest man.
But a magnetic clamp to hold two pieces of steel together.
But that’s pretty good, they are quite powerful. I’d wager that your hard drive wouldn’t like one nearby……
Then someone needs to go back and conditionally re-certify them.
Gilpin County doesn’t have 10,000 voters. If everyone showed up at one vote center and voted, we’d still be below the threshold.
that no one really has a good answer here. Rule number 1 in science, an experiment must be repeatable by others to be considered valid.
But based on what has come out from the Boulder County Clerk, I’m not sure the clerk’s offices fully understand all of this either.
I do know that having architected, designed, managed, and coded tons of enterprise software, that while what we do is good enough for banks, it’s not good enough for airplanes, medical equipment, nuclear reactors, or voting.
– dave
The Rocky Mountain News is reporting that Coffman has decided to back track on the decertification of Denver’s equipment, due to “errors” in the process.
At this point, he might as well put on a funny helmet and ride in a tank…
http://www.rockymountainnews.c…
Coffman clearly has no idea that he has no idea what he is doing. They actually have done studies and have found people who are incompetent at something tend to thing they are well above average at that task. They don’t know enough to realize that they are clueless.
Those who question their own abilities are more likely to be doing a decent job.
I just talked to my County Clerk and Recorder, and she gave me the details on the system we use that has been decertified: the Hart eScan.
The eScan was apparently decertified because of the way it handles stray marks. The eScan is very sensitive to stray marks and will reject the ballot as an overvote if it detects one; this is a known issue, and a software update may resolve it – we’ll know shortly.
In the meantime, decertifying the machine because it counts too many stray marks is somewhat extreme: these are precinct-level scanners, and an overvote is immediately rejected back to the voter for correction (or, worst-case, a replacement ballot). Absentee ballots are reviewed by a Board to minimize this issue as well.
So – one machine decertified because it can’t count past 10,000 (in situations where it might never reach 10,000), another decertified because it asks voters to keep their ballots clean, and the SoS now backpedaling and re-certifying machines due to a “glitch” in the process. I’m not overly impressed with the audit process so far.