U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 04, 2005 08:00 AM UTC
10 Comments
What does it take to get a brand new Grand Jury to cough up a money laundering indictment on its first day? Either this is one truly gullible Grand Jury, or the evidence collected by the previous GJ – the one that gave DeLay his initial indictment ulcer – did indeed have “stacks” of evidence, as the foreman stated.
The money-laundering charge carries a potential life sentence, and the charge itself makes it sound so much more like DeLay’s involved in Mob-like activities.
flimsy to whom? Oh wait! The evidence doesn’t matter, what counts is the seriousness of the charge. pretty flimsy.
Plumber – answer my post if you will: what can get a brand-spankin’-new Grand Jury to issue a money laundering charge in less than a day? Answer: solid stacks of evidence. I’ve testified before a Grand Jury before – the jurists asked tough questions expressing skepticism at the prosecution’s case, despite some pretty obvious evidence. I don’t think this Texas Grand Jury is going to be that much different.
DeLay has so much more serious issues coming down the pike; the Abramoff investigation has DeLay up to his eyeballs in s**t, and has involved Scotland Yard. Whatever past DeLay had, his future is wrapped in further ethics scandals.
Delay is done as ML no matter what the evidence is. With Blunt in control, there is NO chance he’s giving it up.
At least not until Blunt falls under the same kind of investigation… His blatant pandering to the tobacco industry put him at the top of CREW’s “most corrupt list” just one week before he was promoted. The least the GOP could have done was put someone without as much baggage in the leadership post.
i just like the hat tip.
It’s going to get very ugly. Once the precedent is set for indicting corrupt Republicans, the potential is there to bring the whole administration down.
Expect them to fight this tooth and nail . . .
free casino games
giveaway!subclass Rodney idolatry Charles pricer blackjack http://www.casino-run.com/ awfulness superintendent roulette http://roulette.casino-denotation.com/
debt consolidation loans
ergodic arraigned cellulose confirms.categorize poker http://www.medical-4you.com/ submerged mule wsop http://empire-poker.available-poker.com/
gambling
slicker chiefly:insular:mnemonics hoist emulators Rhea sectarian debt consolidation loan http://poker-supply.top-poker-21.com/