U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
August 09, 2009 06:40 PM UTC

Beauprez Destabilizing GOP Senate Primary?

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Colorado Statesman reported Friday:

Beauprez told The Statesman in February that he’d probably have to decide by this summer if he were to seriously consider getting into the U.S. Senate race.

“I changed my mind about the date,” he admitted a few days ago.

“I thought the (political) environment was very murky and unclear at the time.”

But polling numbers are changing on the Democratic side, Beauprez suggested. “Obama’s taking a hit” and the spill over effect could make newcomer Bennet more vulnerable.

“There’s a lack of a clear Republican consensus candidate.”

After a throwaway line or two about how possible opponent Michael Bennet won’t “be completely comfortable at the Cow Palace in Lamar,” Beauprez offers an explanation for what happened in 2006–the disastrous gubernatorial campaign many observers believed marked the end of his political career, often cited as the “worst campaign in Colorado history.”

I think if I were to do it again, I would try very, very hard to talk about issues with people. Frankly, I was told in my last campaign that policy doesn’t mean anything to anybody, and we don’t want to focus on that. [Pols emphasis] We just need to get you out there face to face with Bill Ritter, and people will see the dramatic difference. It didn’t work. So I would very much like to take an agenda, a message to folks that this is going to make a difference in their lives – and why…

Well, to the extent that Beauprez seemed to have nothing to talk about in 2006, and about every time he did open his mouth it turned into a printed apology or embarrassing backpedal…yeah. We can agree that he was probably given good advice to keep his mouth shut. And if you’re having trouble imagining how it would go much better in a statewide race next year, you’re not alone.

But enough about Beauprez. This really isn’t about Beauprez. Beauprez’s threats to wade into the GOP Senate primary are not because he is some kind of savior with ‘elder statesman’ cachet to change the game with. Beauprez is quick to note in every press availability since rumors of his candidacy intensified last week what the real reason for all of this discussion is: grave doubts about the ability of the two present candidates, Ryan Frazier and Ken Buck, to beat Bennet next year.

The doubts about Frazier and Buck appear to be shared by national Republican strategists, as well as funders given the paltry numbers they put up last quarter. It’s not a reflection of any particular strength appointed Sen. Michael Bennet has shown, though we don’t think he’s doing badly for himself in the Senate setting up for next year. It’s the simple fact that the current challengers just don’t seem like serious contenders, in terms of notoriety, gravitas, or ability to raise funds.

As this failure to recruit qualified challengers becomes increasingly apparent, in comes Beauprez–sort of, remember that for all his willingness to trash the other Republican Senate candidates in print, true to “Both Ways Bob” form he hasn’t actually committed to running. But he does have a name people know (for good or ill) and he could, if he really felt like it, self-fund his campaign.

The thing is, Beauprez doesn’t know if this is going to work. What we hear is that he is calling political operatives all over the state trying to get a staff together–without much luck being the word in some circles, he may have to go out of state to get qualified people. According to the Statesman, he’s sworn off the losers from his 2006 campaign like the singularly bumbling John Marshall. But as long as he is threatening to run, there will be some campaign professionals who might otherwise go to work for one of the other candidates standing by to ‘see what happens.’ The same is true, with much greater long-term consequences, for a number of large donors both in and out of state.

Bottom line: as long as Beauprez looms over the GOP Senate primary he’s going to hobble the current candidates, possibly sealing their fate. But if Beauprez gets in and wins the primary, is the GOP’s fate then sealed too? Experience being any guide at all…

Comments

14 thoughts on “Beauprez Destabilizing GOP Senate Primary?

  1. Without taking any policy stands because, hey, who cares? Did they think he was dramatically better looking?  Was that the “dramatic” difference they were talking about? If not, what?  

    As far as Bennet and the Cow Palace, it takes a lot of Cow Palace to beat the densely populated Front Range.  

  2. I can understand how he lost so badly. Whoever told him “that policy doesn’t mean anything to anybody” got it completely backwards.

    It’s the ancillary non-issues that don’t mean anything to voters. Not very many people are policy wonks (maybe that’s what Bob’s trusted confidant meant) but people care a great deal about political issues, and the policies that affect their daily lives.

    The people who don’t care about policy are the media–especially the local TV news media. The media loved BWB’s campaign because he gave them a red meat attack story every night, but voters care more about substance.They might watch the sensationalism, but they vote for policies.

  3. …maybe I am just an easily confused small towner, but what does that remark about the Cow Palace even mean?

    Is it a slam on Bennet, or the Cow Palace? Is Beauprez suggesting he himself LIKES the Cow Palace, and would prefer it to one of the several newer ‘name’ motels that have been built here in the last few years? In which case, fine by me.

    Is he saying Bennet won’t like Lamar? What does he base THAT on???

    I’ve got $5 that says Bennet will be visiting Lamar and having a town hall meeting sooner than Beauprez will….

    1. Beauprez makes comments to this effect about everyone he runs against, be it in a primary or a general.

      You see, no one else in the state really “gets” rural voters like Bob. He makes sure to talk about cows a lot and says “Colorado” every other word so you know he’s the politician for you.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

67 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!