President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
November 02, 2017 03:55 PM UTC
8 Comments
Stay the course Senator. Your basement-dwelling constituents will thank you.
What's the over/under on his "I haven't decided" comments for this piece of trash legislation? Like it is going to be a big SURPRISE how he votes.
Asked if his real name was actually Cory Gardner, the evasive, elusive, suddenly microphone-shy Senator's Spokesatron 3000 responded:
“That fact has not yet been independently verified, has been taken under ill-advisement, is being subjected to a bit of scrutiny and researched superficially, and has become the subject of an immediately delayed, laxly exhaustive, narrowly wide-ranging, generically specific but intensely unfocused three-year investigation by a gray-ribbon committee which has yet to be empaneled, but will be eventually once a group of ten GOP senators who have seen all of Donald Trump’s tax returns and are able correctly to identify the capitol of South Dakota can be located, and all requisite, desperately needed, demonstrably unnecessary funding can be appropriated, misappropriated, and disappropriated. Or not. Too. Also. Especially if there’s an ‘r’ in that month.
Upon their findings — if any, ever — following a few additional years of poll-testing and staff members’ moistened fingers being held aloft, it’s semi-likely that Senator ‘Gardner’ — if that's really his name — will be more than happy and deeply saddened to almost definitely, quite nearly certainly and partially completely confirm, more or less, sort of, to the extent impossible, that perhaps his name is, in fact, something or other. Or something altogether different. Or not. Or maybe it was two other guys. Probably. We don’t know yet. IM me. What was your question again?
OK, who’s next please — oh, and would anybody like a pretzel? We’ve got thousands of ’em. Big ones. Baked ’em ourselves.”
Can I have one with melted cheese? I love pretzels…
So we are told that we need to slash taxes on rich people to bring down unemployment….
The problem is, unemployment continues to trend downward without the give-away to rich people.
https://www.nytimes.com/2017/11/03/business/economy/jobs-report.html?hp&action=click&pgtype=Homepage&clickSource=story-heading&module=first-column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news
I always thought, if it ain't broke, don't fix it.
Header has five too many words.
Imagine my surprise at finding out that the "ban all abortions" party is also pushing to eliminate the adoption tax credit.
Will he answer why religious organizations will now be tax-exempt for their political campaigning?
Will he issue a statement about the continued carried interest allowance?
And by this, I mean will he voice an actual support or oppostion opinion instead of his pre-recorded "I don't know abou that…"?