As the Denver Post’s Mark Matthews reports:
They aren’t toasting yet, but Colorado beer-makers are abuzz about one piece of a tax package in Congress that would benefit brewers — especially the microbreweries that have become intrinsic to the state’s identity.
Under the Senate tax proposal, domestic breweries that produce less than 2 million barrels a year would see their taxes reduced from $7 to $3.50 per barrel for the first 60,000 barrels they produce per year.
If the measure passes — and that’s still a big if — it would be a boon for Colorado’s nearly 350 breweries, the overwhelming majority of which fall into that category.
Notwithstanding the fact that there is nothing in the legislation to replace the lost revenue from this tax cut, or for that matter any more than a token amount of the large revenue losses projected from the so-called “Tax Cuts and Jobs Act”–the latest CBO estimate is a mere 12% of the bill is paid for–you might have the notion that halving the tax on the first 60,000 barrels from your favorite local brewer would at least lighten the load on a six-pack by a commensurate amount.
Except no, sorry:
“We have never positioned this bill as a bill that would give better prices to consumers,” said Bob Pease, president and CEO of the Boulder-based Brewers Association. [Pols emphasis]
No discount for you, beer lovers: now brewer industry representatives cross-their-heart promise that they’re not going to pocket this extra money, but re-invest it–and the benefits will “trickle down” to beer consumers, much like a good craft brew itself within a couple hours of being drunk. Like so many of the tax breaks in this legislation, the losses in tax revenue are plain to see, while the benefits go to much smaller “targeted” groups of people opaque to everyone except the beneficiaries.
Who, unlike your average middle-class Joe Six Pack set to lose under this legislation, have really good lobbyists! So when you hear about the “beer tax break” at your local bar, and you probably will, let the boys know it’s not about the consumer side of the equation.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s Long Past Time to Ban Body Armor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: joe_burly
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Not trickle down. TINKLE down.
Let's see, 165 bottles per barrel, and the tax goes down by $3.50/barrel….
Yay. My bottle costs 2.1 cents less.
Talk about making a molehill out of a mountain.
Like they said, it ain't about the consumer side. So let Homer Simpson know!
Not to mention that beer is highly highly profitable. What do they need this tax break for?
I could ask that about all the winners in the tax bill, but brewers are a good place to start.
It's about one cent per bottle. A barrel is 31 gallons–approximately 330 12 ounce bottles.
Your lack of concern for Colorado business is noted and appreciated, Colorado Pols.
You suddenly become . . .
. . . pro-cannabis
. . . pro-wind power?
. . . have any fucking idea what you’re blargling about now?