President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 29, 2017 11:25 AM UTC

Please Let Steve Lebsock Know His Career Is Over

  • 27 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

UPDATE: Former Capitol lobbyist Holly Tarry makes the point for us:

—–

Rep. Steve Lebsock (D-Thornton)

As Denver7’s Blair Miller reports–Rep. Steve Lebsock, accused of sexual harassment in official complaints filed by Rep. Faith Winter and a former lobbyist who worked with Lebsock at the state capitol, as well as many other women in discussions with reporter Bente Birkeland of KUNC, has apparently decided not to go quietly.

That’s unfortunate for him.

Colorado state Rep. Steve Lebsock, an Adams County Democrat, said Tuesday he’s received more pressure to resign but says he won’t after he was formally accused by a fellow lawmaker of sexual harassment…

“When I am contacted by the fact finder/s, I will submit my official responses to the two formal complaints. Ultimately the truth will come out,” Lebsock said in a statement posted to his website.

He added in the lengthy post that “most of what has been reported is one sided,” that “some of the alleged incidents have been significantly exaggerated,” and that some of the accusations “are completely false.”

After the allegations against Lebsock came to light, House Speaker Crisanta Duran and Lt. Gov. Donna Lynne were among the high-profile Democrats to call for Lebsock’s resignation. Duran stripped him of a committee chairmanship.

Rep. Lebsock’s statement yesterday quickly devolved into an incoherent conspiracy theory about Rep. Winter’s upcoming run for the state senate, suggesting that the Democratic Party wanted a “quick resignation” in order to help Democrats seeking to retake the Senate in 2018. That is both nonsensical and deeply offensive, implying that Rep. Winter is using Lebsock’s alleged harassment of her and other women at the Capitol in order to boost her own career. That is simply not what is happening here.

Going back to Birkeland’s original story on Lebsock from November 10th:

Four lobbyists contacted in the reporting of this story said they considered filing formal complaints against Lebsock over the last three years but worried it could negatively impact their careers, the clients they represent, and their personal reputations.

The reporters who have dug into the growing story of widespread sexual harassment in the Colorado General Assembly have all uncovered a common theme: widespread knowledge among women who work inside the building of who the sexual harassers are, and how to avoid them. The Denver Post’s John Frank described this perfectly:

The warnings start as whispers echoing through the marbled hallways at the Colorado state Capitol.

Watch out for this lawmaker. Don’t be alone with that lawmaker. Avoid these other lawmakers when they drink.

The cautionary tales — passed from lobbyist to lawmaker, lawmaker to staffer, staffer to aide — remained hushed in a place where power and fear create a culture that often tolerates sexual harassment and questionable behavior with few repercussions.

How does this relate to Rep. Steve Lebsock, you ask? Simple: they’re talking about Steve Lebsock. They’re also talking about Sen. Randy Baumgardner, who was hit with a formal complaint yesterday. And they’re talking about some other men, too, who for whatever reason have not yet been exposed. They know who they are. And so do the women with the misfortune of having to work with them.

There is a difference between a man who is truly blindsided by an allegation with no context and a man who stands accused with a wealth of context and corroboration of the allegations. Everything we know about Lebsock’s case suggests that he falls into the latter category: a known and (until recently) unapologetic serial harasser, for whom the allegations are completely unsurprising to those who know his history.

In summary, Rep. Steve Lebsock’s political career is already over. His statement yesterday only further alienated him from Colorado Democrats, basically accusing them of treachery over allegations of sexual harassment from far too many disparate sources to have political origins. His refusal to acknowledge these widespread complaints is a disgrace not just to Lebsock but the Colorado General Assembly as an institution. He should not take his seat when the legislature convenes in January, and the odds of him prevailing in the Democratic primary for Treasurer are resting on the peg at nil. In fact, we’ve even updated The Big Line to give Lebsock one of the only “0%” odds we’ve ever listed in 14 years.

The only person who does not understand this, apparently, is Steve Lebsock.

Tweet
Share

Comments

27 thoughts on “Please Let Steve Lebsock Know His Career Is Over”

  2. He's also an unrelenting narcissist. That "release" on his site should be titled "It's All About Steve."  When he even bothers to mention anything other than himself and his difficulties, it's to (a) point out his generosity and understanding, or (b) accuse them of conspiring against him.  That's some Trump-level shit.

    1. Most politicians are narcissistic.  They really need to expel all four (Lesbock, Rosenthal, Baumgardner, and Tate).

      It might scare some of the rest of them into behaving. Or maybe not. Either way, four less creeps running around.

      1. AC, is that you? Pretending to be a lefty?  A Putin-bot who knows just enough English to fool Trump and Trump’s fools, but not enough to pass a basic political blog troll test. 

        1. And the complete ignorance of the fact that I am the one who rails against both-siderism as a shield for Democrats to evade their moral responsibility. 

  4. “Please let Steve Lebsock know . . .”

    . . . OK, here goes:

    Steve,

    How can I put this in a way that you might start to understand? Hmmmm . . .

    You’ve got about as much chance at a political future as Moderatus does of posting something intelligent today.  (Maybe you can still find a grammy with a dark basement, too? Otherwise, I dunno’ . . . )

    Adios creep!

        1. Fluffy didn't get Mitt Romney's memo about electoral politics being different from the criminal justice system. (Although they do sometimes overlap. see Manfort, Paul J.)

    1. Innocent until proven guilty is an excellent presumption — for the courtroom in a criminal trial.

      "Preponderance of evidence" is a standard used in civil trials — and this evidence exchange seems decidedly lopsided.

      Voter approval and eventual votes are what matters in political matters. Within an institution, there are rules and norms, applied by those voted into leadership positions. We may bemoan the intelligence or values of those voting against us and for an "absolute worst" candidate (I certainly do), but for good or ill, one citizen=one vote. We don't get bonus points for being informed, involved, or insightful.

      In this case, Lebsock has a credible complaint filed against him. He's got a low chance of overcoming that complaint, and no chance of running a winning campaign for a different office.

    2. It's the lech hunt that's on, Moddy, and this isn't about guilt and innocence, it's about right and wrong.  Even if any particular accusation were untrue (I expect that's not the case), the mere fact that women at the capitol feel it necessary to make it a practice to warn each other about Lebsock and Baumgardner is enough to make it necessary for both to go.

      And notice that Ms. Tarry said “worst,” not “only.” All of the harassers need to be removed, regardless of how high they score on the Lebsock/Baumgardner scale.

    3. Fluffy, I realize you're concerned about the slippery slope which is why you are defending a sexual predator who is Democrat.

      The slippy slope, of course, is that if Lesbock goes, then Baumgardner and Tate must go (which not a big problem because vacancy committee will find new wing nuts to replace both) but further down that slope is Roy Moore's fat ass which would present a problem.

       

       

        1. And if Baumgardner resigns, I assume it would trigger a 2018 election in SD8, though as is the seat is not up until 2020. SD8 certainly was not carried by Clinton, but could be an interesting race.

  6. Why isn't anyone reporting on the female lobbyist that dresses like a prostitute and acts in a predatory manner?  Female staffers are known to warn male officials to stay away and never be alone with this woman.  Goes both ways doesn't it? 

    1. Disgusted,

      Nice of you to drop by. We do need another troll here to keep things lively. Which "predatory" lobbyist are you slut-shaming here?

      Or is this some complex ironic joke?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

223 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!