U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
March 03, 2006 09:00 AM UTC

Anybody Know How to Conduct an Ethics Panel?

  • 2 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The Rocky Mountain News has an interesting story today about how Colorado legislators aren’t entirely clear how ethics investigations and panels are supposed to proceed. That’s probably a good thing in one sense, because if they all had vast experience with these sort of investigations (this has only happened once before), we’d all be in a lot of trouble. From the News:

House leaders on Thursday formed an ethics committee to investigate a complaint against Republican Joe Stengel’s payroll charges last year. But they weren’t happy about it, complaining the rules are confusing and appear to require that a new panel be seated every time someone files a complaint about a political rival.

“The rules are stupid,” said Assistant Minority Leader Mike May, R-Parker. “I don’t think we ever knew that before.”

That’s because before the events of the past two weeks – in which both a senator and House member have been accused of inappropriate behavior – only one other ethics complaint is believed to have been filed. On Thursday, a newly formed Senate Ethics Committee met for the first time to discuss how to proceed with a complaint filed against Sen. Deanna Hanna, D-Lakewood.

Senate Majority Leader Ken Gordon, D-Denver, filed the complaint after she demanded $1,400 in “reparations” from the Colorado Association of Realtors’ after it endorsed her opponent in the 2004 election. Under the Senate ethics rule, leaders must determine if the complaint has merit in order to proceed.

Five of Stengel’s constituents on Tuesday filed an ethics complaint against him, alleging “misuse of taxpayer dollars and possible criminal violations.” They cited stories in the Rocky Mountain News, including the revelation that Stengel billed taxpayers while he was on vacation in Hawaii. House Majority Leader Alice Madden, D-Boulder, May and Speaker Andrew Romanoff, D-Denver, unanimously decided the complaint had to move forward. Romanoff declined to comment until the committee has completed its work.

And Madden made her distaste for the task clear. “I’m sick of all this,” she said. “I think we should spend our 120 days on policy, not on politics.”

Appointed to the House Ethics Committee were Democrats Betty Boyd, of Lakewood, Terrance Carroll, of Denver and Paul Weissmann, of Louisville; and Republicans Diane Hoppe, of Sterling and Lynn Hefley, of Colorado Springs.

Under legislative rules, the subject of a complaint has 10 days to respond to the complaint. For Hanna, that is Monday. During the Senate Ethics Committee meeting Thursday, Sen. Steve Johnson, R-Fort Collins, wanted to know what rules Hanna might have violated.

Committee chairwoman Sen. Jennifer Veiga, D-Denver, responded: “I think we’re going to find that the standards are not as clear as we would all like.” Veiga said by the end of today the staff will request copies of all letters, e-mails and such in connection with Hanna’s transactions with Realtors.

After reviewing that information, the committee must decide by March 24 whether there is probable cause to determine whether a violation has occurred. If there is cause, then a hearing is held. Based on that hearing, the committee then can recommend to the entire chamber that the lawmaker be be reprimanded (which likely involves a letter), censured (likely some discussion on the floor) or expelled. Expulsion would require a two-thirds vote; censure or reprimand requires a majority. Democrats have a 35-30 edge in the House, and an 18-17 lead in the Senate.

Comments

2 thoughts on “Anybody Know How to Conduct an Ethics Panel?

  1. crooked politicians sure do make me happy! my question is this: why dont they have an even number of both parties on the panel? seems like the state could actually learn something from the federal way (5 and 5 in the US house of rep.s).

  2. Welcome to the state rules (such as they are…).  My guess is that it’s based on the standard desire for no ties; the majority party therefore gets an extra seat.

    I wonder along with the article: since this is so rare, do we even have formal charges against Stengel’s or Hanna’s conduct?  This whole fiasco might be a call for a major ethics bill.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

112 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!