U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
September 11, 2009 06:30 PM UTC

Josh Penry, Spammer

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

As the Denver Post reports, though maybe you already know about it:

Some state Capitol workers received a blast e-mail Thursday from Republican Josh Penry’s gubernatorial campaign, fueling speculation that the lawmaker was using government e-mail lists for election purposes.

Not at all, said Penry’s campaign manager, Mike Britt.

Britt said the campaign asked supporters – including lawmakers and lobbyists – to share their distribution lists. That could be how the campaign ended up with e-mail addresses to state government accounts, he said.

Penry’s message was sent on his private campaign account. And while not illegal, the mass distribution was seen by some as a breech of statehouse protocol.

House Speaker Terrance Carroll called the incident a “rookie mistake.”

“I personally would not have sent it to people’s state e-mail accounts,” Carroll, D-Denver, said. “Those accounts are not intended for campaign junk mail, and it puts people in a tough position when you send these things to Republicans, Democrats and everybody’s mama.”

Among those who received the e-mail: nonpartisan legislative staffers; Katie Reinisch, spokeswoman for the House Democrats; and Jim Carpenter, chief of staff for Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter…

Don’t freak out too much, the practice of freely exchanging (or selling) email lists between candidates is ubiquitous, as anybody’s whose ever put themselves on a single candidate’s list knows very well–privacy policies be damned. And it’s not against the law to send electioneering emails to a government address, sending electioneering emails from one would be the problem.

That said, there is something that folks on the data end of political campaigns call “list hygiene”–merging and cleaning up all these lists you’ve accumulated before you slap them into your database. Part of that, for future reference, should include removing campaign email blast recipients who might be problematic for various reasons, like your opponent’s chief of staff. Go ahead and sort out all the @state.co.us addresses while you’re at it, just to avoid any further “misunderstandings,” which–shocker!–tend to happen more often when you spam the enemy.

But cut Josh Penry some slack this time we guess, rookies do these things.

Tweet
Share

Comments

14 thoughts on “Josh Penry, Spammer”

  1. Ok.  Now, all of you GOP staffers be sure to visit Bill Ritter’s website to sign up for e-mail updates (like Jim Carpenter did on Penry’s site).  As soon as you receive a campaign e-mail from Ritter, be sure to call the Denver Post to demand an equal time news story.  

  3. nonpartisan legislative staffers; Katie Reinisch, spokeswoman for the House Democrats; and Jim Carpenter, chief of staff for Democratic Gov. Bill Ritter…

    This is ridiculous – Reinisch & Carpenter want to get a copy of everything Penry sends out. They probably both have gmail accounts just to be on his list. He’s saving them a bit of time.

    1. not after.  “Nonpartisan legislative staffers” doesn’t describe the second two items, it is one of three items under the heading “Among those who received the e-mail:”

      1. …the real reasons to be indignant. This constant effort to make mountains out of molehills adds to the partisian rancor in this country.

        Beat Josh up for the legitimate things – there are plenty of those. This is a non-issue.

      2. that it is a semi-colon, not a colon.  But you correctly note that “nonpartisan legislative staffers”; were intended to be read as separate from the partisan spokespeople who followed.  Punctuation is important.

          1. The colon is where it belongs, the semicolon delimits the list, and the commas delimit the parentheticals.

            The writer might have replaced the colon with the word “were” but that’s a matter of style.

          2. You’re right that it is a colon BEFORE the phrase non-partisan legislative staffers and semi-colons after them.  I misread your post.  The punctuation, and the interpretation you gave it, is correct.  Now, can we get back to analyzing’s Libertad’s lousy sex life?

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

79 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!

Colorado Pols