We told you this was coming. After last Friday’s indictments against numerous Russian nationals and organizations for their role in subverting the 2016 presidential elections on behalf of Donald Trump, the Denver Post’s John Frank unleashed this morning the first of what we expect to be a wave of exposes–tying the well-documented nationwide effort by the Russian government to influence the 2016 elections to specific local names and faces.
Or, as the case may be, Twitter trolls:
Russian interference in the 2016 U.S. presidential election exposed hundreds of thousands of Colorado voters to misinformation and propaganda through media outlets and social networks, a new analysis of Twitter data shows.
The majority of the Colorado-related messages broadcast by Russia-linked Twitter accounts appeared to favor Republican Donald Trump and foster discontent in the nation’s political system, according to a Denver Post review of more than 200,000 tweets sent by the Kremlin-backed operation. And more than a dozen of the posts appeared in news stories published by Colorado media organizations before and after the election, further extending their reach.
The analysis offers a glimpse into how Colorado voters became a target in the Russian effort and echoes an indictment Friday from special counsel Robert Mueller that says Russia tried to “spread distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general.”
To briefly summarize Frank’s excellent reporting, which everyone should read in its entirety, a massive NBC News spreadsheet of deleted Twitter activity from accounts revealed to be part of the Russian disinformation effort shows numerous instances in which a subset of (we assume) authentic local fringe-right conservatives were systematically amplified. In other cases, Russian propaganda accounts were directly cited by local news outlets as authentic local opinion. Chronologically speaking, the Russian operation to gain and wield influence in American elections via social media does appear to predate Donald Trump’s presidential campaign.
But that’s not really the point. The point is the goal of spreading “distrust towards the candidates and the political system in general.” By amplifying fringe voices, and where necessary creating false fronts to directly organize Americans in the service of Russian political objectives–which became the election of Trump after the opportunity Trump presented to disrupt American politics was apparent–they helped create the political chaos that allowed Trump first to win the Republican presidential nomination. And then, via fewer than 100,000 votes in the Rust Belt, the presidency.
With all of this said, we think it’s important to keep in mind that Trump never won the state of Colorado. He did not win the Republican state assembly, in fact being humiliated here in a sweep for Ted Cruz. And he did not carry the state of Colorado in November. We recognize that based on the polls, most Colorado Republicans have gone through their various coping processes of accepting Trump’s victory–and generally support him now that he is President.
Today, there should be two categories of Colorado Republicans: those who were used by the most successful foreign intelligence operation against this nation maybe ever, and know it, and those who are mad as hell.
Because the Russians did not help elect Donald Trump in order to make America great again.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Delta County’s Rep. Matt Soper Opposes Birthright Citizenship
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s Long Past Time to Ban Body Armor
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Russia also supported Cruz at one point – and IIRC that was pointed out in the past here.
And just because Trump wasn't running doesn't mean he wasn't on the path – MAGA was trademarked in 2012/2013. He revived birtherism in 2011. He'd even toyed with the Presidency before on the Reform ticket in 2000.
But IMHO Putin was only looking to knock out Clinton and take down the US through discord. Trump is a useful tool (and potentially one he has levers of control over) but only in that Trump is destroying our respect and leadership in the world and inflicting damage on the country internally; it's not like Putin has to order Trump to do these things…
While I agree Trump comes by his destructive (and potentially treasonous) instincts naturally, what is also concerning are those in his circle who have financial interests in furthering Russia's agenda at our expense, epitomized by Paul Manafort and other current or former advisers, including members of Trump's immediate family.
Trump himself is up to his neck in Russian financial entanglements. I don't mean to discount the possibility that Trump really is on the end of Putin's puppetmaster strings, only that Putin would be happy if the "only" result of his play is sowing discord and weakening US/NATO power.
Trump is walking into Impeachment according to former congresswoman Elizabeth Holtzman.
Trump swore a duty “UPHOLD AND DEFEND THE CONSTITUTION FROM ALL ENEMIES, FOREIGN AND DOMESTIC.”
He’s not fulfilling his oath and every one of our representatives should be acting on his inaction now.
That likely article of impeachment has ample evidence to support a conviction. It is simply a matter of what event will finally compel a majority of Republicans in Congress to act on it.
At least two conditions will need to be met:
1. Trump becomes more of a liability than asset to the GOP (with Pence assured of succession)
2. Evidence of complicity by the GOP is suppressed, thus not endangering anyone else (especially Pence), making Trump the patsy for all the damage to our country's reputation, institutions and moral leadership.
Don't think you can have #1 without #2, so hard to see impeachment at this point. Just a lot more #2 before they're all gone in November.
I think I’d probably have a bit more faith in the
AFW – Republican Party CircularDenver Post analysis of this issue if they’d admit and publish the facts of their own complicity . . .