U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 09, 2009 07:25 PM UTC

"Ben$on" Makes Good?

  • 12 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The appointment of GOP powerbroker and former gubernatorial candidate Bruce Benson to the Presidency of the University of Colorado, if you recall, was a controversial matter–liberal activist groups and many faculty members opposed his nomination, and his appointment by the CU Board of Regents was not unanimous.

Since then, Benson has seen a great deal of the other side of higher education funding issues, and seems to have genuinely recognized the university’s needs–even if that means running afoul of Republican axioms. Last week, Benson attracted notice for strongly defending CU against suggestions that it be privatized as part of a budget fix.

And today? Praising the benefits of the federal economic stimulus bill for the University of Colorado. From his periodic email newsletter:

CU researchers, students benefit from federal stimulus funding

Our top priority is providing students a great education. Classroom teaching is essential to that, but so is research. CU faculty members are dedicated to sharing their knowledge with undergraduate and graduate students in the classroom and research laboratories. Together, they are striving to answer some of the same riddles faced by scientists around the globe: Will global climate change affect humanity? What are the best approaches for detecting and treating cancer? Which renewable energies will be cost-effective solutions for our energy needs? Can stem cell research lead to cures for some of the most debilitating illnesses?

Collaborating on finding answers can lead to some of the richest experiences for our students and faculty. Because discovery and innovation are important aspects of higher education, finding funding sources for faculty research is crucial, too. In fact, sponsored research funding is an economic lifeline for academic researchers, even if it comes in the form of one-time federal stimulus funding. Since Sept. 14, CU researchers across our four campuses have received a total of 220 research grants worth $119.5 million through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act (ARRA). Over the coming weeks and months our faculty, assisted by professional and student research assistants, will apply these funds to projects that could result in new medicines, therapeutic treatments and technological breakthroughs. These advancements will not only highlight their brilliant work, but will help us tell the stories of the great people who teach, conduct research and serve the Colorado community.

Yes, that “pop” you just heard was indeed Josh Penry’s head exploding.

Comments

12 thoughts on ““Ben$on” Makes Good?

  1. As opposed to just being happy to get money?

    I mean if that was the only qualification, pretty much anyone except Sarah Palin, Bobby Jindal, and Mark Sanford could qualify to be CU President.

  2. Not only was he supposed to raise money personally, he was supposed to be the driver behind an effort to find another funding stream for public higher education. So far, zero for two.

  3. non (or at least less) partisan if he was appointed; I think we need to recognize this as an example.  

    Is there a way to find out how much money he has raised for CU?  That was, if I recall correctly, one of (if not the) the reasons for his appointment.  

    1. Was not that he would be nonpartisan; it’s that he would stay out of Republican party politics and fundraising. He serves his Republican masters at CU just fine (including Ludwig, who IMO is a DINO at best and a closet Republican at worst).

      1. I guess I haven’t seen too much from CU that suggests he is serving “his Republican masters” well.  Are you referring to something specific?

        I rather took the lack of news from CU to be good news . . .

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

212 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!