Chalkbeat Colorado’s Melanie Asmar reports on a court ruling this week that went against public school teachers and in favor of Denver Public Schools administrators enforcing a landmark 2010 “teacher effectiveness” law that has split Democrats for years–and remains a thorny issue during the ongoing Democratic gubernatorial primary:
The Denver teachers who challenged a landmark state law that allows school districts to put certain experienced educators on unpaid leave lost their cases Monday.
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled against the educators, who sued Denver Public Schools in 2014 alleging that the state’s largest district violated their rights to due process. Some of the teachers had lost their positions in schools and failed to get re-hired by a principal within a set period of time, which led the district to put them on unpaid leave — a move the teachers argued amounted to getting rid of them without cause or a hearing.
The district argued it was simply following a 2010 state law, known as Senate Bill 191, that changed the rules for teacher evaluations and assignments. The law allows teachers who lose their positions because of circumstances such as student enrollment declines to be put on unpaid leave if they don’t find new positions within 12 months or two hiring cycles.
The Colorado Education Association voiced its displeasure in a strongly-worded statement:
Colorado educators are very disappointed by this pair of unreasonable decisions that strip away rights of experienced educators at the expense of our students’ success. It’s baffling that during a time of teacher shortage, when we know teacher pay and working conditions do not stack up to the demands of the profession, that our courts would discard employee due process rights that provide teachers a small measure of protection against arbitrary actions. Today’s decisions sweeps those protections away to the detriment of our schools and the students they serve.
The proponents of Senate Bill 191 explicitly asserted that they were not repealing the due process rights of experienced teachers, yet that is what the Court decided to do today. The CEA will take our fight for teachers due process rights back to the legislature to fix an education system that continues to operate with serious flaws to the detriment of our schools and students. We need to keep the focus of evaluation where it belongs – improving the professional practice of teachers and the public education experience for Colorado children. Colorado’s well-documented teacher shortage has causes rooted in economics; however, we can’t ignore the consequences of SB-191 in draining teacher morale and agitating career dissatisfaction. [Pols emphasis]
But who else had something to say about yesterday’s ruling, you ask?
Gubernatorial candidate Mike Johnston, a former educator and state senator who sponsored Senate Bill 191, said in a statement that “we all share the same goal: to do what’s right for Colorado’s kids.”
“With today’s decision,” Johnston said, “we can move forward in that spirit and work together to improve achievement for students across the state.”
Mike Johnston was backed up in Asmar’s story by Ready Colorado, a conservative education policy organization described as “small group of well-established Colorado Republicans…aiming to make education reform a top priority for the GOP again.” While the chicken/egg order of origination isn’t clear, Johnston’s “teacher effectiveness” bill is now model language at the conservative American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) for use by conservative lawmakers in other states. At the same time, SB-191 has been widely blamed for contributing the shortage of teachers in Colorado–and also for driving out qualified instructors who simply don’t want to have their intelligence insulted.
With all of this in mind, what you have here is a “victory” that Johnston won’t be celebrating–at least not during a Democratic primary. Arguably Johnston’s biggest achievement in the Colorado General Assembly, there’s little to suggest eight years later that this legislation has done anything other than increase enmity between teachers and administrators and turn qualified candidates away from the profession.
Congratulations, Mike.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Air Slash
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: QuBase
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: QuBase
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: allyncooper
IN: President Jimmy Carter, 1924-2024
BY: Michelle Foust
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Just Another Very Fine Person Taking Donald Trump Seriously
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: President Jimmy Carter, 1924-2024
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Maybe Johnston's just playing for the wrong team.
I think so, and so did my county caucus. Nobody voted for him in the straw poll. He and Lebsock should rebrand as Republicans or Independents and try again.
When SB 191 was being debated, I emailed Mike Johnston (several times) asking to talk to him about it. As a DPS parent, I was opposed to the bill, and I was his constituent. I never heard back from him, although I was added to his fundraising list. I went down to the Capitol and he refused to meet with me. I know several other parents and teachers who had the same nonresponse from him. I disagree strongly with his views on education, and will definitely not vote for him in the primary.
Nice to know how Johnston approaches "constituent service" and "responsiveness" on his distinguishing issue. Thanks for sharing your experience.
– Jared Polis
I suppose, if one were looking for a fairly direct analogue, one might look at Vergara v. California, a California decision (overturned on appeal), which the AP described thusly:
Here's Jared extolling the virtues of that initial ruling.
Whataboutism–it's good for education policy too!
Any Democrat who fails to worship at the altar of the teacher's union must be purged!!
Colorado Pols is so far left it's toxic to fellow Democrats.
*crickets*
Wow! So, being joined at the hip of the teacher's union is toxic? Are they as toxic as the NRA? Is the teacher's union okay with dead children like the NRA is?
Anything that boosts gun sales is okey dokey with Nutlid — he bought gun stock at the peak during the Obama years, and cries every time he looks at his portfolio
Too busy COUNTING HIS MONEY!!!
In negative numbers.
We have an altar? I'd settle for better pay and working conditions….
Moddy, as far as worshiping at the altar…..
I thought you were a big believer in letting people practice their sincerely held religious believes. Even to point of forcing those beliefs on others.
Mike Johnston is right.
He's right about this and he's smart as hell about this and other things.
Just ask him?
Well, yeah.
go talk to him. If not during campaign season, after. He's not going to be governor, he'll have time.