President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 06, 2009 09:57 PM UTC

GOP Health Plan "Breaks Down Barriers"--To Forced Abortions?

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Fascinating reality check from the Center for American Progress, with a local twist:

Under the Republican health care alternative filed in the House, young and healthy individuals can purchase policies from insurers that don’t abide by local benefit or rate standards. The Republican bill allows the health insurer to choose a “primary state” “whose covered laws shall govern the health insurance issuer” and market policies to other states without adhering “to all of the consumer protection laws or restrictions on rate changes of the state.”

Over at MYDD, Bruce Webb, calls the provision, “Sweatshop Insurance.” “This bill goes far beyond that in stripping states of power over insurance rates and conditions,” he notes. It “explicitly expands the definition of ‘State’ to include not just D.C. and Puerto Rico, which makes some sense in context, but adds BY NAME the Virgin Islands, Guam, American Samoa and Jack Abramoff’s favorite client-the Northern Marianas home of the ‘Made in the USA’ Chinese-owned close to slave labor sweatshops.”

As Webb goes on to explain, “companies can simply designate the Northern Marianas as the ‘primary State’ for their plan, or since it is closer the Virgin Islands and then have those governments be the sole regulator. And given the record of corruption in the N. Marianas and the willingness of various Caribbean and Atlantic Island nations to let themselves be used as off-shore banking and tax shelter entities you can bet Aetna and WellPoint are slavering at the prospect of ‘basing’ their plans out of a PO Box on some tropical nation.”

Really changes up this debate, don’t you think? Does this mean that under the GOP health plan, there could be federal funding…for forced abortions? Of course the parasailing therapy could be an attractive benefit. We’re sort of joking, but on the other hand, not really.

That’s partly because in Colorado, we’ve already seen this proposal to undermine local regulatory authority over health insurance by ‘breaking down state barriers,’ known as the “race to the bottom bill”–revisit last year’s battle over the failed House Bill 08-1327, sponsored by Rep. Cory Gardner and Sen. Shawn Mitchell. You’ve got to admit that after all the horrifying press Bob Schaffer earned from his Mariana Islands “model” last year, seeing it named in the federal version of Gardner’s bill–as a “model” for health insurers to relocate to–is unusually rich.

Comments

11 thoughts on “GOP Health Plan “Breaks Down Barriers”–To Forced Abortions?

  1. .

    Maybe the Pelosi bill rates the same level of scrutiny ? If so, then maybe bogus diaries about the Catholic Church opposing Health Care reform will appear here less frequently ?

    .

  2. Ironically the pubs still can’t get around the fact that the whole problem (less regulation and more insurer gimmies) is still not the solution.

      1.  I don’t know if your statement is a “snark” or not.  If so, never mind.  If not, ten to one you won’t respond because tort reform has had NO impact on medical expenses in Colorado. NONE. NADA.  We have had tort reform since 1989……

          1. If we had tort reform, I could eat as much pie as I wanted and never get fat, my car would never break down or need gas, and it would be a Ferrari. And I could get a massage whenever I wanted and it wouldn’t cost a thing. And Libertad would be interesting and intelligent.

      2. If we have tort reform, the doctor will have to pay me for the privilege of taking my gall bladder out!

        And it will pay off the national debt!

        And get rid of all the Mexicans!

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

81 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!