U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 22, 2018 12:16 PM UTC

Gazette Lashes Out In Defense of Hate Groups

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Phil Anschutz’s paper loves them some haters.

An editorial published in the Phil Anschutz-owned Colorado Springs Gazette yesterday mounts a surprisingly bitter and sweeping attack on the Southern Poverty Law Center, who readers may know agreed to a significant settlement this week to a person accused of supporting anti-Muslim hate, later stating that accusation was in error.

For the Gazette, this settlement opened some kind of weird floodgate–where seemingly everyone ever labeled by the SPLC as a hate group now has a viable challenge:

The SPLC’s hate map is a political weapon that lists peaceful religious and civil rights organizations as haters. It places them alongside the legitimately hateful Ku Klux Klan, Neo-Nazi’s, and the Westboro Baptist church of “God Hates” gay people.

This space occasionally provides examples of the SPLC hate-listing people the organization simply disagrees with. Here in Colorado Springs, the SPLC lists The Pray in Jesus Name Project, The Family Research Institute, and Christian Civil Rights Watch as “hate groups.”

Now, the Pray in Jesus’ Name project is the Youtube “ministry” run by former Rep. Gordon Klingenschmitt–who has said enough unambiguously hateful things in his few years in the local spotlight to fill a warehouse. The Springs-based Family Research Institute, operated by notorious anti-gay quack psychologist Paul Cameron, seems to be a perfectly defensible listing by the SPLC as a hate group as well:

Among [Cameron’s] more recent defamations was an FRI pamphlet asserting the primary activity of the gay rights movement is “seeking to legitimize child-adult homosexual sex.” In another, he claimed that with “the rise of the gay rights movement, homosexual rape of men appears to have increased.” In yet another, he wrote, “Homosexuals were three times more likely to admit to having made an obscene phone call” and “a third more apt to report a traffic ticket or traffic accident in the past 5 years.”

…In late 2010, reacting to reports that his group had once again been listed by the Southern Poverty Law Center as a hate group, Cameron told The (Colorado Springs, Colo.) Gazette that he believed homosexuality should be criminalized in America and that he was fine with a proposed bill in Uganda that would punish some gay sexual acts with death (“Whatever they decide, I’m OK with”). He also proposed heavily taxing gays and single adults because of their failure to produce children. And he suggested that gays and lesbians undergo a “public shaming” of some kind. [Pols emphasis]

So no, we’re not seeing the connection between this settlement with one person who was apparently wrongly accused by the SPLC of supporting hate against Muslims to everybody ever accused of being a hate group by the SPLC suddenly having a second chance at legitimacy. And the specific local cases the Gazette cites above inspire the opposite of sympathy.

And for all that, the Gazette wasn’t done:

The SPLC defines hate groups as organizations “that attack or malign an entire class of people … ”

Given this sensible definition, we wonder when the SPLC plans to include the Colorado Civil Rights Commission on its “Hate Map.”

It’s true that the recent Masterpiece Cakeshop Supreme Court case sidestepped a ruling on the merits of the case by concluding that the Colorado Civil Rights Commission had shown a “hostility toward religion” in its proceedings. But that doesn’t mean the underlying decision by the Commission that Masterpiece Cakeshop had discriminated was wrong. And to compare the work of a commission charged with protecting citizens from discrimination to groups on the SPLC’s hate group list who are avowed proponents of discrimination is offensive in the extreme–as much as President Donald Trump asserting there are “very fine people on both sides” after a white supremacist plowed his car into anti-Nazi protesters at Charlottesville.

In the end, what this broadcasts very clearly is that the Gazette’s sympathies do not lie with the victims of discrimination. They lie with the perpetrators of discrimination, and the Gazette was so eager to rehabilitate the fallen reputations of Gordon Klingenschmitt and his local hater ilk that they just proved it to the whole world.

Finally, for the search engines: Phil Anschutz, Clarity Media, AEGCoachella.

Because we think the cool kids who supply Anschutz with his billions really ought to know about this.

Comments

14 thoughts on “Gazette Lashes Out In Defense of Hate Groups

  1. Must have been a memo from the Right-wing Noise Machine central HQ to go after SPLC. Did you see the Thiessen op-ed in the Washington Post? 

  2. Is Paul "The Gerbil Doctor" Cameron still around?

    The last heard, Gale Norton, as attorney general, had endorsed him an "expert" during the Amendment Two case 25 years ago. When she found out what a nut he was, she dropped him from the state's witness list,

    1. How tightly have you embraced Walker Stapleton, Fluffy? And come Wednesday morning, when Vic Mitchell is the nominee, will you profess to have been behind Mitchell all along?

      1. Moderatus: "conservatives disagree, liberals label and ostracize….."  Think you've got that reversed. Also appears you've never read any of the comment threads on Yahoo News. Far more people commenting about "libtards" and "libturds" there than the opposite.

    2. When the disagreement is pro v. Anti fascism, racism, misogyny, we will continue to shame and ostracize people like you Moddy, you bigot.  Anschutz is a bigoted POS.  so is trump.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

175 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!