U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 02, 2018 10:15 AM UTC

Quid Pro Quo? Anschutz, Inc. Standing Up For Scott Pruitt

  • 2 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

The New York Times’ Eric Lipton has been keenly observant of what appears to be a questionable relationship between Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Scott Pruitt and Colorado billionaire Phil Anschutz–Anschutz being, in addition to the owner of the Coachella Music Festival and a bevy of entertainment properties a major investor in polluting industries that Pruitt directly presides over:

It is an interesting chain of events to say the least: after an undisclosed meeting with Anschutz, ostensibly for “campaign purposes” so as not to require the normal disclosure of the EPA Administrator’s official-capacity meetings, you have Anschutz’s flagship Washington, D.C. media outlet running cover for Pruitt! If that doesn’t make you wonder what Anschutz and Pruitt talked about in their undisclosed meeting, it should. Pruitt’s defenders have boiled down to the most factually impervious voices (see the hot take in the Examiner for a fine example). You have to really want to do it.

One thing’s for sure: you won’t read about any of this in the Colorado Springs Gazette.

Comments

2 thoughts on “Quid Pro Quo? Anschutz, Inc. Standing Up For Scott Pruitt

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

192 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!