As CNN reports:
Reading prepared remarks to reporters at the White House, Trump reiterated that there was no collusion between his campaign and Russia and that the country’s efforts had no impact on the final results.
He said that when he returned from the summit with Putin in Helsinki, Finland, he “realized there is some need for clarification” about his remarks on Russian interference in the 2016 election.
“In a key sentence in my remarks I said the word ‘would’ instead of ‘wouldn’t,'” Trump said. He explained he reviewed a transcript and video of his remarks.
“The sentence should have been: ‘I don’t see any reason why it wouldn’t be Russia,'” he said. “Sort of a double negative.”
“I think that probably clarifies things pretty good on itself,” Trump said.
Not so much, no.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: NotHopeful
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: NotHopeful
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: harrydoby
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
FAKE PUNCTUATION!
It's like an adolescent trying to get out of a grounding by saying "that's not what I said".
NPR All Things Matter played the clip. And the continuation, when he opined that "Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today."
If he couldn't focus enough to articulate the difference between "would" and "would not," should we let him go into other meetings without substantial pre-developed talking points written so he can read them off and do handouts at the same time?
They shouldn't let him use the phone or leave the White House unless accompanied by Kelly, Mattis or some other adult supervision.
Plus, if he’d said what he claims he meant to say Putin would have whacked him on the spot. By ‘whacked’, I mean he’d have pulled the pee tape from his inside front pocket and tossed it to the press like a bridal bouquet.
What happened to the 400 pound libtard lying on his bed that could have been the culprit?
– October 19th, 2016
Reading this and stealing it.
Wow! Did she see it coming.
he misspoke?
I seriously doubt the man knows what an apostrophe is…
Weren’t there 12 of them that followed Jesus around back in the day?
Jesus ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘ ‘
Surely he could spare one for the tangerine traitor.
😂😂
Actually, 13. Mary Magdalene was known as the Apostle to the Apostles.
Did that make them the Gang of 14? Oh, never mind, That was Congress.
Some people are saying that The Dumpster® sucks Putin's dick because:
* Pee tapes are real
* He loves dictators (except South American ones)
* Syphilis has rotted/is rotting his brain
* Putin has solid proof that "the kids" committed treason during the campaign
* He is an idiot
I don't know, I'm just asking.
1, 2, and 5 for sure. 3 and 4 ?????
Rev. Dr. Barber FTW.
👏👏
Wait – wasn't this an answer to a press question?
I blame it on a missing cerebral cortex