U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
December 16, 2009 10:46 PM UTC

Polis Introduces Innovative Reform to Create New Workforce

  • 8 Comments
  • by: Middle of the Road

( – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Jared Polis, Diana DeGette and John Salazar announced on Tuesday that they are uniting with 80 other Representatives to move an immigration reform bill forward. The Comprehensive Immigration Reform for America’s Security and Prosperity Act of 2009 (CIR ASAP) includes several provisions, one of which I find intriguing–the HR 4259 Employment Benefit Act, introduced by Representative Polis.

The EB Act would expand the current EB-5 immigrant investment visa program, which was established in 1990 to attract foreign capital to the US and create jobs for Americans. Current requirements include establishing a business or investing in an existing business that was created after 1990, a minimum investment of $1 million dollars, and the creation of at least 10 full time jobs or 5 full time jobs for American workers in a Targeted Employment Area (TEA.)

The expansions being proposed include the following:

• Increase visas from the current 3,000 issued annually to 10,000

• Create a new visa class, called the Start UpVisa

• Broadly expand TEA to include rural areas, high unemployment areas, counties with 20% or more population decrease since 1970, and areas within the boundaries of a state or federal economic development incentive program

Businessweek voiced its support on December 2 and referred to the Start Up Founders Visa Program as a unique way to attract foreign investors while simultaneously creating new jobs in high unemployment areas. Also worth noting is the bipartisan support this reform is receiving.

How palatable would such a program be politically? U.S. Representative Jared Polis (D-Colo.), himself a former entrepreneur, is developing legislation to make it easier for foreign founders of investor-backed startups to secure visas to remain in the U.S. On the other end of the political spectrum, even Newt Gingrich, the Republican former Speaker of the House, has blogged about the need to make the country “more accessible to skilled immigrants.” He wrote this after witnessing “the dynamic entrepreneurial and high-tech business culture in Tokyo, Beijing, and Seoul”-countries with which we are competing for top talent. Representatives of both ends of the political spectrum can agree on this issue.

The Obama Administration knows that it is all about the economy. Every poll simply reinforces the obvious. The Democratic leadership has to find ways to create new job opportunities. It’s time to turn to 21st century solutions for 21st century problems. From the look of it, Polis is doing just that.  

Comments

8 thoughts on “Polis Introduces Innovative Reform to Create New Workforce

    1. I had stumbled across Businessweek’s article last week and saved the link to it. Then, this a.m., I heard on NPR about our three Dems (where the hell is Markey, by the way) joining together to move immigration reform forward. I went to Polis’s website to read the entire proposal and I’m utterly impressed with the expansions he’s proposing.

      The Industrial Revolution is over–the millions of jobs that were lost over the last decade are not coming back. We have to find new and inventive ways to create jobs and equally important, to keep foreign workers here who have the expertise and skills but are moving back to their native countries (ie. China and India) because job opportunities are drying up here. I think this is a damn good start.

        1. and only adds to our problem. From the linked article:

          At the same time, a founder visa program could stem the tide of talented, tech-savvy foreigners who are leaving the U.S. to seek fortunes in their home countries, primarily China and India. Even foes of flexible immigration policies who rail against both skilled and unskilled immigrants may have a hard time finding fault with granting visas to startup founders.

          We need them to stay here, to start up businesses here, to move our technology forward here, to seek their fortune here, where they can feed our tax base, create jobs and fuel our economy.  

          1. “Bring me your rich, your elites, your job creation….”  Not.

            Selling visas to the highest bidder, in effect.  Shameful. It’s another sign of our third world status.

            We did fine for decades w/o foreign investment of this nature.  It’s a band aid for some terrible core problems that can be traced to labor surpluses via immigration and the cost of keeping older skilled Americans on the payroll.  This visa may provide some jobs, but like any complex proposal, it will be gamed.  

    2. He was effective in helping to kill off cram-down.  He was effective when he talking smack to national newspapers about “liberals” and health care reform.

      If by “effective” you mean prominent beyond his years in office, then yes, Rep. Polis has been effective.  If by “effective” you mean someone responsible for positive change of any magnitude, then no, he hasn’t been terribly effective.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

74 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!