(Promoted by Colorado Pols)
Conservative talk-radio host Ross Kaminsky dredged up an old conversation Tuesday, saying Social Security is “clearly” a “Ponzi scheme” and a “fraud.”
To his credit, Kaminsky didn’t just proclaim the 80-year-old program a “Ponzi scheme” and move on. Instead, he had a six-minute debate with Max Richtman, director of the National Committee to Preserve Social Security and Medicare. Listen here..
A search of Colorado politicians who agree with Kaminsky that Social Security is a Ponzi Scheme revealed U.S. Rep. Mike Coffman (R-CO), who told a radio host a few years back that Social Security is “obviously” a “Ponzi scheme.”
In fact, a Ponzi scheme is defined as an “investment swindle in which supposed profits are paid to early investors from money actually invested by later participants.” Maybe that’s what Social Security sounds like to people who think government shouldn’t collect taxes and devise programs to help people, because the program relies on the ongoing collection of Social Security taxes.
But if you’re ok with basic taxation for the benefit of yourself and others, you probably understand that Social Security is no swindle, but actually a successful government-run retirement system based on a funding formula that’s worked, with rational adjustments, for 80 years.
Asked about his Ponzi-scheme comment later, Coffman told Fox 31 Denver’s Ron Zappolo:
Zappolo: You are never afraid to say controversial things.
Coffman: It’s true.
Zappolo: I’ll give you just a couple. You went on somewhere the other day and said that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme. You’ve also talked about how all ballots should be in English. Correct?
Coffman: Right.
Zappolo: Do you ever think about, as a politician, some of these things, I might be better off steering away from?
Coffman: You know, no. [smiles] My staff wishes I would. [laughs]
Zappolo: The honesty comes out. [laughs]
Coffman: But I don’t. The thing with Social Security. I think it is, although I agreed with Ponzi.
Zappolo: You scared people in your district who are 65 and over.
“Social Security is social insurance,” said Richtman Kaminsky, who’s the morning host on Denver’s KHOW 630-AM. “You need to try to wrap your head around that, Ross. Social Security is a program of insurance for families. Social Security pays old-age survivor and disability benefits. A third of Social Security benefits goes to non-retired workers, spouses, survivors, disabled, children. About 3 million children get by because of Social Security. So this is insurance for families. [With Social Security,] you are buying insurance in the event that something happens to your framily and to have some modicum of decent living when you do retire.”
“Insurance is a contract,” countered Kaminsky. “You don’t have any contract with the government. They could change this. The only thing that’s keeping them from changing it, ending it, whatever, is political realities, which political realities, which is better than nothing I suppose.”
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: Stanistan
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: unnamed
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: “Operation Aurora Is Coming,” Says Thrilled Aurora City Councilor
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: ParkHill
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Add a "to" between Richtmann and Kaminsky in the next to last paragraph, Jason, and it will make better sense.
Calling Crowe campaign: Please make ads nailing Mike Coffman on his “Social Security is a Ponzi scheme” remarks.
Bingo. Hopefully get his exact quote on this. Of course the little weasel will walk back his comments when confronted on it. Guaranteed.
Ponzi? Like the Republican tax plan? Or Donnie's commercial ventures?
Great articles — this pretty much sums it up:
Mike Coffman has drunk the Trump juice too.
Coffman demonstrating his stupidity yet again, (1) not knowing what a Ponzi scheme actually is, and (2) not understanding that the right to vote is a fundamental constitutional right–like the second amendment, only without guns.
Oh they understand that the right to vote is fundamental to a democratic society which is why they work overtime to suppress it.
They don't try to supress the vote of old white guy!
Yep. "Ponzi scheme" is idiot-speak for "money-related stuff I don't like."
Of course it is a Ponzi scheme. This is a silly article
You don’t understand either Social Security or Ponzi schemes, or you’re just plain lying. You usually apply your politics to issues in much more interesting and enlightening ways on this site, at least that’s my impression. Shame to see your dogma intrude.
No one need have any illusions that when confronted with facts, you'll change your mind. However, by definition, a Ponzi Scheme is a "form of fraud in which a purported businessman lures investors and pays profits to earlier investors using funds obtained from newer investors." Social security, on the other hand, is enshrined in Article 22 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. How you can compare the two is indicative of your ignorance of the two subjects.