U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
August 15, 2018 12:50 PM UTC
12 Comments
HE is accusing Brennan of "erratic behavior"? Well, at least he didn't call Brennan a dog.
Trump has an exquisite ability to take self-insights and project them as perjoratives upon others.
It is both innate and unconscious.
He is truly crazy. I really think he is not playing with a full deck.
"playing solitaire 'til dawn with a deck of 51…………"
(Statler Brothers, "Flowers on the Wall," 1965)
Trump isn't smart enough to know that he is missing a card in his deck.
Although he's probably got a couple of extra Jokers in the deck.
Dictators must root out their opposition totally. It's in Mein Kampf I think.
Aww, poor wittle Twumpie is having a bad day! Waaaaaaahhhhh!
It will be interesting to watch the reaction of “House Speaker Paul Ryan [who] on Tuesday attempted to downplay President Donald Trump’s threat to revoke security clearances of former national security officials who have criticized him, brushing it off as just “trolling.”
“I think he’s trolling people honestly,” the Wisconsin Republican said at his weekly news conference on Capitol Hill.”
Whoa…didn't see this one coming!
I just hope we don't need John Brennan's national security expertise in the near future, as he is no longer cleared for it.
We do need John Brennan, with security clearance intact so that he can warn us of foreign attacks on the voting infrastructure. The Brennan Center for Justice is one of the strongest clearinghouses of voting and election-related information anywhere.
Ed: the Brennan Center for Justice is named after the Supreme Court Jusice, not the former CIA Director Brennan. Same diff, though. I expect the Drumpster has them confused.
The Brennan Center is suing the Trump administration to find out which states are planning voter purges. Hence Trump's preemptive attack.
I'm not sure how best to push back on this, but will fall back on the futile-seeming "Call the white House" tactic.
A lot of things may go by the boards in the meantime, but my bet is that if we can get a Dem in the White House in two years, those clearances will be restored. On the other hand, some of the people who serve in the Yam's Sad-ministration may see theirs revoked.