U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
September 28, 2018 11:15 AM UTC
12 Comments
Sadly, keeping promises is not Gardner's strong suit.
Liars. No one is "blowing off" Deborah Ramirez. She was asked to PROVIDE EVIDENCE.
What the hell is happening to this country? Does due process and the rule of law mean nothing to Democrats any more? This is scary. You people are really dangerous.
Also, Juanita Broadderick says hello! She has a #metoo story too if you ever care to hear it.
Yeah. We need lectures from a guy who treats women that accuses Republican men like this:
So, when you shared the post debunking your Fake News about Jared Polis with your alleged female friends, did you share those comments.
I am a little confused. A few days ago you said this:
Moderapist, what do you believe "evidence" means?
Once you tell us what you mean by "evidence," Moderatus, please let us know a bit of context. How much "evidence" do you have from a casual gathering in your living accommodations of 35 years ago? How much from any unplanned event from your college days?
I was in graduate school then — and could do no more that provide my memory of events. There may be others who would remember the same events, but I could not provide any material evidence. I can only think of one friend who has diligently been writing a daily entry for decades and has kept the volumes of his thoughts — and I'll bet he didn't include full descriptions of every party he went to, either.
Her sworn testimony is evidence you moron
Moddy, you should consider learning the law, because you clearly have no clue. Her testimony (i.e., her story) IS evidence. Many sexual assault cases do not have physical evidence. A victim's testimony can be the only evidence, and it is enough to support a conviction if the jury chooses to believe and the testimony satisfies each element of the offense. So once again, you are wrong.
Broderick is not alleging assault by Kavanaugh. It is Kavanaugh's behaviors that ought inform committee members of Kavanaugh's suitability to receive appointment.
Broderick's assault by Clinton has already been considered in the last impeachment. Clinton's behaviors have had serious consequences.
It is almost time for Kavanaugh to begin experiencing consequences for his behaviors
She is being asked to provide evidence before Republicans will talk to her, that is on heard of
Sounds like the FBI is on the case; hopefully Ramirez is on the schedule as initial indicators say she will be.
How did Colorado fall for Gardner?
Bring back Udall.
Gardner has to go in 2020
Where to begin in answering that question………..
1. It was a midterm election in the 6th year of an incumbent president's term. The president's party usually loses some seats.
2. Gardner sold himself as happy, cheerful, moderate conservative. Remember the commercials of his smiling face in front of the wind farm (gee, maybe Cory is an environmentalist). He ran a smart campaign.
3. We were told he would not have any impact on reproductive choice. IIRC, the Denver Post used that to justify its endorsement of him.
4. Mark Udall ran a God-awful campaign. All those damn commercials with his scowling face talking about abortion. I am not saying that he should not have mentioned reproductive choice but he should have talked about other stuff too.
5. And in politics, style is as important as substance. The scowl never wins an election. Remember Ronald Reagan and his cheerful disposition? Udall apparently did not.