President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%↑
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd
(D) Adam Frisch
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
52%↑
48%↓
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 10, 2018 09:30 AM UTC
12 Comments
COFFMAN: If it’s a violation of law.
Of course, we won't know if there is a "violation of the law" until there is an indictment, trial and conviction.
And sitting Presidents can't be indicted. Of, if they are, there will be a long and complicated pre-trial, probably with appeals going all the way to the Supreme Court. The same Supreme Court with Justices who have voted to short-circuit post-election counts because they were worried about not having a decision in time for Inauguration Day for a Republican (though that decision said it wouldn't be a precedent); and a Justice who recently was put on the Court with writing saying a (Republican) President shouldn't be distracted by trials. And that adjudication of pre-trial motions would take awhile for every level to carefully consider and return with an opinion.
And if there is an indictment, there shouldn't be a "special" focus on the case, so it would be put on the calendar like any other trial — which means 3-6 months after the pre-trial motions are done.
I'm figuring that gets Coffman safely beyond the 2020 election.
lol
On a scale of 98-100, how big a lying sack of shit and entrails is Mike Coffman? Cuz you KNOW it isn't less than 98.
Wow, he will absolutely say ANYTHING to try to keep his seat. Question to Roger Edwards: Do you agree with Coffman being open to impeachment?
Coffman doesn’t know what Coffman agrees with. He would need to check with his minders at EIS on the poll results. Maybe poll the ethnic communities to see thumbs up or down. Short of murder I would not vote for impeachment of the President and that would depend on who the victim was ;>)
I'd consider giving a unicorn to every child who wanted one. In the end, I'd reject it as impractical due to the current unicorn shortage, but I'd consider it.
Coffman is about that likely to vote to adopt articles of impeachment against Trump.
Thanks for the perspective, Phoenix Rising. Funny, laugh out loud funny.
I've been told by someone I respect that more short, biting responses might perk up blogs.
Like: "Trump stinks!" ?
Let's not drag Darryl Glenn into this.
You can just smell the desperation — and it Stinks!
John wrote: "and sitting presidents can't be indicted……" Has that ever been adjudicated at the federal level? Trump is facing several non-federal court situations in New York state; one of which is a civil matter. I've read that a federal policy regarding indictment of a sitting president doesn't necessarily apply to a state.
It has not been adjudicated at either the State or Federal level. That's one reported reason for at least one of Mueller's hires: to argue novel constitutional issues.