We’ve written several times in the last few days about Sen. Cory Gardner’s handling of the aftermath of last week’s midterm elections in his role as chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee (NRSC). Two close Senate races in Florida and Arizona have left Republicans scrambling to shore up their sole bright spot in Tuesday’s overall drubbing, retaining Mitch McConnell’s GOP majority–and Gardner found himself and his organization under heavy fire as Republican claims of “election fraud” were deconstructed in real time.
The result was the worst weekend of earned media for Gardner in months, if not ever–and an ominous pall over Gardner’s head as attention now turns to his own re-election in 2020.
Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner, the chairman of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, cast the GOP’s concern about Arizona’s handling of ballots as having been resolved by the agreement Friday…
Gardner’s comments came as he defended a statement the NRSC released just a day earlier.
The GOP’s official Senate campaign arm, in a news release Saturday, accused Maricopa County’s top elections official, Democrat Adrian Fontes, of “using his position to cook the books” for Sinema.
Gardner said Sunday on NBC’s “Meet the Press” that “there’s a lot of releases that are going to go out that I don’t see.” He added that he was “not familiar with this one.”
NBC News reports on the sour reaction to the NRSC’s similar claims in the Florida Senate race:
Colorado Republican Sen. Cory Gardner, the head of the National Republican Senatorial Committee, defended Florida Republican Gov. Rick Scott’s charge that “unethical liberals” are trying to “steal” the state’s Senate election, in which Scott a candidate…
Democrats have blasted Republicans like Scott and President Trump for suggesting foul play, arguing that the main goal is to be sure every ballot is accurately counted.
And the Florida Department of Law Enforcement has told media that there have been no specific allegations of voter fraud and that it’s not currently investigating any foul play in the vote count. [Pols emphasis]
Despite the fact that Republicans will retain the U.S. Senate majority, the net result of all of this press for Gardner since Election Day has not been positive to say the least–either in Arizona where Democrat Kyrsten Sinema claimed victory this weekend, or in Florida where the court battles over recounts continue. And where it concerns Gardner personally, all talk today is about his own vulnerability after Colorado went strongly blue this year, and how his closing ranks with Trump has damaged Gardner’s own brand:
Gardner faces a fight for his political life in a state that appears increasingly blue. Since 2008, Democrats have won every Senate, gubernatorial or presidential race in Colorado — except for Gardner’s victory over Democratic Sen. Mark Udall in 2014.
Hillary Clinton won the state in 2016 by about 5 percentage points as Democratic Sen. Michael Bennet comfortably won re-election. Last week, Democrat Jared Polis won the Colorado gubernatorial race by about 8 percentage points.
Gardner, a first-term senator, has rarely broken with his party during the Trump administration’s tenure, despite his state’s blue lean. He voted with Republicans on a range of key measures, including repeal of the Affordable Care Act, the overhaul of the U.S. tax code and the confirmation of Justices Neil Gorsuch and Brett Kavanaugh to the Supreme Court.
Conservative columnist Jennfier Rubin at the Washington Post is considerably more blunt:
Over the weekend, Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Colo.) who heads the National Republican Senate Committee, joined President Trump and Florida Gov. Rick Scott (R) in fanning conspiracy theories — baseless and irresponsible theories, that is — about possible vote stealing in Florida.
On Monday, a story ran in the Denver Post under this headline: “Colorado Republicans’ conundrum: Donald Trump and the unaffiliated voters who loathe him; Insiders say Cory Gardner’s re-election prospects are grim unless GOP can develop new message.”
While the dust hasn’t yet settled from last week’s elections, which have steadily turned out better for Democrats as the votes were counted and now understood to be a significantly greater Democratic win than Election Night punditry suggested, one of the very first takeaways from 2018 is a broad recognition of Cory Gardner’s vulnerability going into 2020. Gardner’s high visibility during the 2018 elections as NRSC chair has given him much less room to plausibly maneuver away from Donald Trump, even though after the historic Democratic landslide in Gardner’s home state this year that’s exactly what he needs to do.
In two years, we may well be writing the story of how Gardner’s boundless ambition, which propelled him to the chairmanship of the GOP Senate campaign organization, in the end brought him to ruin.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Tina Peters Not Going Quietly Into That Good Night
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: bullshit!
IN: Republican FINALLY Condemns Colorado GOP Hate Mail Sent On His Behalf
BY: Chickenheed
IN: Republican FINALLY Condemns Colorado GOP Hate Mail Sent On His Behalf
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Two Republicans Launch Silly “2nd Amendment Caucus” for Reasons They Can’t Articulate
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Republican FINALLY Condemns Colorado GOP Hate Mail Sent On His Behalf
BY: Thorntonite
IN: Republican FINALLY Condemns Colorado GOP Hate Mail Sent On His Behalf
BY: coloradosane
IN: Tina Peters Not Going Quietly Into That Good Night
BY: Matt A. Harry
IN: Republican FINALLY Condemns Colorado GOP Hate Mail Sent On His Behalf
BY: bullshit!
IN: Republican FINALLY Condemns Colorado GOP Hate Mail Sent On His Behalf
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
This is why, starting now, the Dimocrats need to run ads about Cory. Early positioning works.
Here's hoping there will be a coherent ability to highlight Sen. Gardner as he tries to stay on the high wire of the modern day Republican party. He's going to be searching for a balance — how can one be close enough to Trump to avoid a primary and keep the enthusiasm of the Trumpian base voters AND far enough away to not repel the Unaffiliated OR enrage the Democrats?
I'm thinking his life will be complicated by the House putting some key issues into "must pass" legislation that he will need to take a vote on. By Trump & co. finding some additional ideological soulmates as Sad!-ministration officials or judicial nominees, thus requiring Senate confirmation. By Trump continuing to fight on tariffs and earning retaliation from other countries that will hit Colorado's agricultural economy. And by the Trump genius at spoiling ceremonial moments, antagonizing party allies, and staying with his "I'm great — I alone can solve problems" rhetoric.
I think Cory should find a nice cushy gig like head of the Arabian Horse Association.
Or with all the vacancies and staff churn in the
basket of snakesWhite House, he could easily get a job there. Who knows, Hick might even appoint a Republican to replace him.Even Melania is openly rebelling:
But I suspect Cory is hoping the Koch brothers will take him back under their wing (or some other part of their anatomy).
Before we get too optimistic about Bill Nelson overcoming his vote deficit, remember.….
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/11/13/us/florida-recount-senate-scott-nelson.html?action=click&module=Top%20Stories&pgtype=Homepage
Does anyone doubt that even if Nelson pulled ahead or won in court, Mitch McConnell would say, "So what?" and have his caucus seat Rick Scott anyway?
It probably wouldn't get that far; the Florida Legislature could reject the result as they were willing to do in 2000.
I think that only goes for selecting presidential electors. In the early days sometimes the state legislatures elected the electoral college members themselves.