President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
March 05, 2010 09:54 PM UTC
17 Comments
It’s a liberal organization. He’s been hitting Bennet from the left.
They show Bennet leading.
I’d give more credence to a poll that should favor Romanoff but doesn’t, than a Conservative outfit that wants Democratic division.
All I can do is analyze the data we’re given. Research 2000 could prove to be more accurate, but they need to poll the race more.
Rasmussen has been following this race for a while now, so it’s easier to spot trends and correlations.
as you know. The right is interested in promoting the primary for as long as possible.
That’s just the name of the game. If I’m Romanoff and I see these numbers, I’m thinking second wind.
He’s relying on Republican talking points, polls, and news outlets.
I have the Personal pac activity, and his financial statement from the SOS office.
Debbie Fischer said I was lying about it.
Should I publish the links?
Seriously. I know they have this rap as a super-left-wing group, but their template is more that they’d rather see a conservative Dem succeed in, say, Wyoming, than a Republican.
That said, do they favor progressive outcomes? Sure – but not necessarily to the exclusion of electoral success.
His race has momentum.
who is statistically tied with Norton.
but yeah, it is good to see the GOP losing steam in the race.
i imagine the moves by Bennet to pass legislation and Romanoff’s campaigning have led to both getting more positive press.
Much like the Clinton – Edwards – Obama and eventually Clinton – Obama primary, this primary is keeping all the media attention focused on the Dem side of the aisle – making both candidates more well known (and although you may not agree, it is also, I believe making Bennet more progressive)
You’re all funny!
“Wow, this poll is great! Bennet will only lose by NINE points! Yeah!”
or better yet, “Yeah, Romanoff will tank after a month when his office has to close because they can’t pay any bills!”
thanks for using what i presume is your real name.
however, it is hard to verify the opinions of bloggers who have cropped up here in the past 2 months (such as yourself, starting in feb.) – just as this Senate race is becoming competitive.what brings you to this site?
Obviously not.
The Research200 poll was paid for – I forget the shell front group’s name – but a quick Google found a quote on the front page of their own website “… the group pushing hardest for the public option..”
Its just an amazing coincidence that the poll they paid for found an astounding level of support for the public option from our neighbors!
Who knows how accurate they are. I sure don’t. I haven’t seen the exact number of people they called. What time of day. What list of names, where they obtained the list.
The actualy questions asked each time, etc, etc.
Without any of that information you are all screaming into a hurricane in the dark. Its a pointless, usells exerecise that may make you feel better, but doesn’t do anything else.
BUT a poll like that is useful for tracking trends. IF they are at all a decent group, their questions, sample sise and pool sources will remain consistent…
Thus watching the trend line IS worthwhile.
And for that it just means that Bennet has to actually start taking Romanoff apart. If he wants to win that is.
But generally- they also don’t adjust for likely voters or partisan voter reg distribution.
In short- the numbers aren’t the greatest.
I’m sure both D nominees have their own internals. I’m sure both know what they want to know about the likely D voters.