[mantra-pullquote align=”right” textalign=”left” width=”40%”]“Frankly, it feels like we’re negotiating with children sometimes.”
— Senate Majority Leader Steve Fenberg (3/21/19)[/mantra-pullquote]
Republicans in the State Senate (and to a lesser extent, the State House) have decided to go all-in on their tantrum strategy of “delay, delay, delay” because they don’t have the votes to stop legislation that makes them sad. It is perfectly within the rules for a legislator to demand that everything be read aloud, but usually nobody makes this request because it is a complete waste of time and money.
Denver7 has more on this “childish obstruction”:
“The constitution gives us the right to say ‘Slow down. Don’t make these big changes,’” Senator Own [sic] Hill from Colorado Springs said.
On Thursday, Hill requested that the Senate journal, or minutes from the previous day’s session, be read back in full before work could start. That took a half hour to complete. Hill then asked for multiple bills to be read out loud in full before they were voted on…
…The Democratic Majority Leader of the Senate disagreed with the tactic, calling it “obstructionist.”
“They’re basically slowing things down to a crawl and creating an embarrassment for the institution of the democratic process,” Senator Steve Fenberg said…
…It took the Senate two-and-a-half hours to vote on two total bills on Thursday morning. [Pols emphasis]
Per the demands of Sen. Owen Hill and friends, Senate staffers have been required to read the entire journal from the previous day, including the votes taken by every Senator on every bill (Senate Journal for March 21, 2019 starts here on page 509).
Reading the entire journal aloud on Thursday took about 48 minutes. This is what it sounded like:
Marshall Zelinger of 9News has more on the poor bastard whose job it is to read aloud to a bunch of grown men and women. We’re looking forward to Senate Republicans trying to explain this nonsense to voters in 2020.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: QuBase
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: The realist
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: kwtree
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Weekend Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Weekend Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I am reminded of an observation by the late, great, Speaker Ron Strahle, R-Fort Collins.
"The stupid ones have a role in the process too. They slow the rest of us down."
The House Minority "Leader" is too busy trying to push bogus recalls.
The Dems need to get ahead of this. Here is a suggestion: change the session hours. Majority leader should announce at 11:55 pm when they recess for the day that they will reconvene at 5:30 am for the reading of the journal and all bills scheduled for that day. Serious business begins at 10 am.
Good idea. Maybe that'll shut em up.
Let the tree fall in the forest with no one there to hear it…
Maybe do it at 12:01am.
I wonder though, let's say no Republicans show up at 12:01am. Can you just vote to stop reading?
They could just run away to deny quorum, like some others legs have done, no?
Generally, a quorum is not larger than a majority of members. That same majority can also set times for sessions and set rules of procedure, except for changes in the status of members or existing rules which require a super-majority.
Hire a motormouth to read/speak.
High school and college debate seasons are basically over, and some of those students can sustain 300+ words per minute. I'm sure they'd be willing to work for a modest stipend.
An auctioneer.
Well, the Democratic Party controls the trifecta. That provides ample resources for making the Republicans sorry for being obstructionist.
Maybe take away all their office spaces, and make the share a cube-farm.
What kind of really vindictive law could you come up with to make their lives hell? Like Trump cutting disaster relief to Puerto Rico and California, while sending crop subsidies to soybean farmers suffering from the tariffs he created.
Is the requirement to read truly in the Constitution?
I knew the Colorado Constitution was a long document, but I hadn't heard it reached the level of parliamentary procedure for the legislative chambers. Articles about the court case only say the reading "violated the spirit of the Constitution" and violated rules of the Senate.
Does someone know if the Constitution really does go into parliamentary procedure? And if so, could you provide a reference, as I couldn't find it with a word search.
It is. From Ballotpedia Article V, Legislative Department
In addition, due an amendment to Section 7 in 1988, the length of the regular session is limited to 120 days. Basically the state constitution is designed to allow just one legislator to stop everything and run out the clock. This is probably not an accident since the anti-government zealots had a good long run of getting shit in the state constitution from about 1985-2000.
There is, however, nothing I can find about limited the length or subject of special sessions. Anyone have any reason that Polis could not summon everyone back after a week break to try again from June to December with every bill the Democrats want to pass named in the proclamation?
Thanks …
I suppose I should be thankful there is a chance for illiterates to serve in the legislature without worrying they would be mislead about a bill … but a rule in the Constitution requiring a bill to be read aloud twice stretches my inclusive soul.
Anything in there says they can't have ten, maybe twenty people reading different parts all at the same time
T***plicans need to learn the Dems can play fuckee-fuckee, too.
So, you’re expecting voters in Colorado Springs to actually select legislators who aren’t slow? And, just where do you expect those legislators to be found in EpCo??
. . . ”I’m ajust be repesentin’ them constitients what done sent me here.”
DougCo is even worse.
The stupid runs strong in Mesa County.
Speaking of that…I ran into John Justman a couple of days ago.
P.S…the reply function is really weird..sheesh.
The requirement to read bills at length on request is definitely the law, but I wish the media would push back a bit on statements like Hill's, where he slips in a notion that the Constitution has any relevance to the blatantly partisan strategy of abusing bill reading as a stall tactic. Plain reading of Section 22 says absolutely nothing about intentional delay – while the clause about dispensing with reading entire bills seems closer to acknowledging that legislators can decide reading a bill out loud takes more time than it's worth.