UPDATE: Gov. Jared Polis weighs in, and while he doesn’t name Mark Kennedy specifically the message is clear:
As the University of Colorado moves forward in its selection process for a new President, it's very important that they find a candidate that unites the board. It’s never good for a candidate or the institution if the board is split on a decision of this magnitude. #copolitics
— Jared Polis (@GovofCO) April 18, 2019
—–
As the Denver Post’s Elizabeth Hernandez reports, an interview at Colorado Public Radio with the controversial sole finalist to be the next President of the University of Colorado, former GOP Rep. Mark Kennedy, took a turn for the embarrassing when he flubbed a basic and essential question about the role of affirmative action in university admissions:
Host Ryan Warner referenced the U.S. Education Department’s Office for Civil Rights requiring Texas Tech University’s medical school to stop considering race in admissions. Warner asked Kennedy what his thoughts were, in general, on affirmative action in Colorado college admissions.
Kennedy stumbled.
“I have not wrestled with that at a university yet, in that restrictions have not been as — let me go back,” Kennedy told Warner. “Can I just not answer that question?” [Pols emphasis]
No, as the sole finalist for President of the state’s flagship public university, you have to answer that question.
So Mark Kennedy did. And it was not a good answer:
Kennedy told Warner the question caught him off guard and followed up with: “I think however we do admissions, it has to be done in a way to recognize that diversity provides a benefit to all and there are many ways of doing that.”
While it’s true that diversity among student bodies is beneficial to everyone, affirmative action is most certainly and foremost meant to benefit the minority groups who have been historically underrepresented in higher education. To inartfully dance around this central fact, especially after trying to avoid the question entirely, is problematic to say the least–you might call it the college admissions equivalent of “all lives matter.”
Kennedy later told the Post that the reason for these troubling answers to a very straightforward question were the result of him worrying about being late to his next appointment, and “clarified” that affirmative action should result in neither “undue benefit or undue penalty.” Unfortunately that clarification doesn’t clarify much of anything–and honestly sounds more like a swipe against what affirmative action is, you know, all about.
Fair to say that if you’re one of the CU students protesting your new “sole finalist,” your concerns were not allayed.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: Lauren Boebert is a Worthless POS
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Election Day 2024 Open Thread #1
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
"Can I just not answer that question?" Sure. Go ahead. It's just what we're looking for in a University president. Congrats, Board of Regents, you really outdid yourselves here.
So CU will become Trump University, converting Colorado's richest, most privileged kids into little GOPers. Neat.
Learning about the specific vote on whether to hire this candidate or not ought to be interesting. The Regents have 5 Republicans, 4 Democrats — I'm sorta hoping it won't be a directly partisan decision.
The larger question in my mind is whether any President is going to be able to work with the legislature and governor to provide additional resources for the Colorado University system and other higher education institutions. CPR did a story in May of 2018:
For the CU Boulder Campus in 2018-19, current budget income proportions are about Student tuition 47%, Govt. Grants/Contracts 20%, Private Grants/Contracts 10%, Auxillary Operating 14%, Indirect Cost reimbursement 5%, Direct State payment, 4.5%. In short, CU-Boulder is running on past investment and less than 5% of its operating budget coming from the state.