President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
April 28, 2010 09:45 PM UTC

Hickenlooper refuses to name recipients of $2.8 million in charity

  • 20 Comments
  • by: Rossputin

H/T Todd Shepherd & CompleteColorado.com

Yesterday on the Caplis and Silverman radio show, Denver Mayor and Democratic candidate for Governor John Hickenlooper came on the air to answer questions about why he is refusing to disclose the recipients of $2.8 million in charitable contributions over the past 20-ish years.

Hickenlooper’s arguments were, to put it gently, strained, in the face of surgical questioning by attorneys Dan Caplis and Craig Silverman, and raise more questions than answers.

For the rest of my thoughts on the topic, please visit my site at:

http://rossputin.com/blog/index.php/hickenlooper-refuses-to-name-recipients-of-2-8-million-in-charity

Comments

20 thoughts on “Hickenlooper refuses to name recipients of $2.8 million in charity

    1. Candidate X claims he gives lots of money to charity.  Turns out he didn’t give a dime and then makes some bogus elk meat story on top of a couple of other lies.  He can’t and won’t furnish a shred of proof because he is caught red handed being the STINGY FREAKING LIAR THAT WE ALL KNOW HE IS !  – NO STORY/NOTHING TO SEE HERE

      Candidate Y gives 2.8 MILLION dollars to charity, shows proof of donations but refuses to disclose recipients because out of basic decency he thinks maybe the recipients wouldn’t like the attention – HUGE MASSIVE STORY – THERE MUST BE SOME SORT OF COVER UP.  LETS CALL IT HICKENGATE OR SOMETHING.

      Weak, and pretty sad attempt at cleanup.

       

  1. $2.8 million and you’re giving him a hard time?

    Next thing you know, Republicans will be questioning the patriotism of soldiers who lost their legs in war.

    Oh wait…

  2. Please, oh please, keep talking.  That was very rude what Pols said.  Once you get to China you’ll be back on this side of the globe in no time.  

  3. Since when did it become important to demand to know the names of charities that politicians donate to?

    McInnis has come under fire because he has said he gave a lot to charities, but there’s no evidence of that being true. The issue for him has been about covering up his own silly lie. Until he brought it up, it’s not like anyone was asking McInnis — or anyone — which charities received his checks. McInnis is creating his own problems here.

    And from a purely strategic standpoint, why on earth would you want to keep mentioning that Hickenlooper gave $2.8 million to charity? That makes Hick look good — it doesn’t hurt him. You’re fighting fire with toothpicks here.

      1. was Planned Parenthood.  The Republicans would go bonkers over it and it could irk some independents and Dems as well.

        I wonder if McInnis’ elk was a roadkill.

        1. Was that he donated to some groups that the Dem base wouldn’t like. What’s probably the case is with that much money, almost everyone will see 1 or 2 that are not their favorites.

          But I figure, if someone is handing out 2.8 fucking million dollars to charities, the only proper response is thank you very much.

          1. But I figure, if someone is handing out 2.8 fucking million dollars to charities, the only proper response is thank you very much.

            It’s not something one can easily spin negatively in a governor’s race, I’d imagine.  

            1. the most pathetic part of all is that they are even trying to spin this.   When you have absolutely nothing I guess its something to do.

              1. I’m not sure, Fidel.  If one is going to brag about millions of dollars in donations, one should probably be prepared to disclose where it went.

                I say that as a Hick supporter.

  4. $2.8 million to charity is bad. Refusing to release tax returns is good.

    Why don’t Republicans have any decent candidates for anything? This should have been McInnis’ race to lose, but he’s doing everything in his power to give 2010 to the Dems.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

133 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!