President (To Win Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(D) Kamala Harris
(R) Donald Trump
80%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) V. Archuleta
98%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Marshall Dawson
95%
5%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(D) Adam Frisch
(R) Jeff Hurd
50%
50%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert
(D) Trisha Calvarese
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank
(D) River Gassen
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) John Fabbricatore
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen
(R) Sergei Matveyuk
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(R) Gabe Evans
70%↑
30%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
April 30, 2010 08:35 PM UTC
16 Comments
Loading ...
and I think you can flip a coin between them.
then it would be Bernie by far. But if the McInnis campaign sticks with the self imposed disaster of the week mode, then I’ll agree with you.
because I think he really belongs in the can’t lose category but think Hick’s a pretty sure thing too.
I didn’t even think of him . . . but I think it would be very difficult for him to lose.
Tipton was a lousy campaigner last time, and I don’t expect to see him do much better this time.
Denver Broncos… Still Suck!
Romanoff as the surest thing? Really? Surest thing, huh? Seriously?
All four Senate candidates have votes.
Some may be more of a long shot than others, but to call any of them a sure thing is ridiculous.
Salazar and Buescher are such obvious picks, they don’t even have their opponents listed in the poll.
I see he now has two. I like Bennet’s chances myself but the question was who is the surest. We all like our own choices but how can anybody really think their right arms would be safer bet on either of them than on Salazar or Hick? Really?
Colorado was not polling in favor of HC Bill in Washington. And with hot Senate, Gubernatorial and Congressional races…nobody will have time to pump that much money into the AG race
Garnett is going to trounce Suthers. Suthers has no base, no volunteers, no excitement, no enthusiasm.
But the point is that Suther’s decision to throw a John C. Calhoun-style “nullification” fit has dragged him off his pedestal and thrown him into a tough fight in a year when showboating incumbents may not fare that well.
Barring any reason to vote otherwise, people will vote for him.
It remains to be seen whether his involvement in a lawsuit pisses off Real People.
As much as I hate to say this, you can’t win in Colorado without Real People.
I don’t know. Honestly. All I know is that we who read Pols are not Real People.
Real Americans as our favorite national propagandist would say?
Mini-people?
People of the corn?
People without a purpose?
Purple people eaters?
It’s already brought him a credible opponent who apparently can raise the money to make a real race out of this. And being compared to South Carolina in any context, as I just did to John C. Calhoun/Suthers . might be enough to make him take a hike on the appalachian trial!
As to incumbency, I doubt if one coloradan in ten could tell you who the incujmbent AG is. Try that test the next time you visit Starbucks. I think there are real people at Starbucks, though I’m not sure those funny names constitute real coffee.
2) nobody gets excited about the AG race very much
3) Those who oppose HC Bill are the majority in Colorado
4) He is already in office
5) It is a Republican year