Congressman Ed Perlmutter (D-Jefferson County) made some big news today by declaring that former Gov. John Hickenlooper has his support for a potential 2020 U.S. Senate campaign:
John Hickenlooper was an outstanding Governor and he would be a great Senator for Colorado. If he decides to run, I’ll be proud to support him. #copolitics #COSen
— Ed Perlmutter (@Ed4Colorado) August 18, 2019
Perlmutter’s support carries a great deal of weight amid a crowded field of Democratic candidates for a couple of reasons. First and foremost, Perlmutter is (not very) arguably the most well-known, and well-liked, member of Colorado’s Democratic congressional delegation. This kind of pre-emptive announcement of support is also not something you normally see from the seven-term Congressman, so Democratic activists and party leaders are going to take notice.
And, of course, Perlmutter himself had long been considered to be a potential top candidate for U.S. Senate in 2020. We actually moved his name off of The Big Line on Friday as speculation mounted that Hick was likely to enter the race sometime soon; our logic: It is unlikely that Perlmutter would still consider the Senate race if Hickenlooper is indeed running (for the same reason, we also dropped Rep. Joe Neguse of Lafayette from The Big Line).
Perlmutter’s early endorsement is an unmistakable signal that Hickenlooper is both likely to enter the Senate race and likely to pick up support from notable other Democrats once he does. Hickenlooper announced last week that he was dropping his bid for the Democratic Presidential nomination, at the same time acknowledging that he was considering taking a run at the seat currently occupied by Sen. Cory Gardner (R-Yuma). Gardner is widely considered to be among the top 1-2 most endangered incumbent Republican Senators on the ballot this cycle, which only increases the pressure for Democrats to find their best potential challenger in 2020.
As we wrote here on Friday, both polling and simple logic point to Hickenlooper as the best candidate for Democrats to defeat Gardner in 2020. Supporters of the Senate candidates already running argue that the Party would be fine with any number of those candidates. Maybe, but it’s tough to make a strong case that Hickenlooper is not the Democrat with the best chance of defeating Gardner. Perlmutter surely thought about that and came to the same conclusion.
This is a blog about politics. Fundamentally, success in politics requires that you win elections. As we’ve seen in the last four years, Senate Republicans aren’t going to do a damn thing about anything — they won’t even consider discussing any number of important pieces of legislation passed out of the House this year — so Democrats need to take majority control of the Senate for anything significant to happen on issues from health care and education to equal rights and gun safety. For Democrats to win the majority in 2020, they need their best candidates (say, Hickenlooper) running against the most endangered Republican incumbents (like Gardner) around the country.
It’s tough to argue against Hick’s likely frontrunner status should he enter the race for Senate. Lots of people can, and will, argue about how far left Hickenlooper sits in the Democratic Party. But what that discussion can’t change is this: Among Colorado voters, Hick has already shown — twice — that he can carry the top of a ticket in a statewide election. These are just factual truths.
Perlmutter’s endorsement of Hick today is both symbol and signal. Another signal that Hick is coming, and a symbol of the support that appears to be waiting for him. If Democrats around the country can find their Hickenloopers — the candidates with the best chance of winning, period — then they can re-take the Senate majority and maybe even turn that mess back into a functioning government.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: davebarnes
IN: Holy Crap Boebert Bestie Matt Gaetz’s Ethics Report Is Bad
BY: MarsBird
IN: It’s Long Past Time to Ban Body Armor
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Holy Crap Boebert Bestie Matt Gaetz’s Ethics Report Is Bad
BY: The realist
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Holy Crap Boebert Bestie Matt Gaetz’s Ethics Report Is Bad
BY: coloradosane
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: MartinMark
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Monday Open Thread
BY: coloradosane
IN: Aurora: Still Not Overrun by Venezuelans (feat. Dave Perry)
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
The big dogs are coming out. While the lefties won't like it, keep in mind that unaffiliated voters are large in number. Getting Gardner out of the Senate is top priority.
Agreed. A lot of them are out (for Andrew) 🙂
Once again, Washington DC picks our representation. The Oily Boyz are desperate to get their man in the senate.
Fossilonians Unite!
What I’m most curious about is how someone doesn’t get to 100% in a poll with questions like this?
Question 1.
Vee haf your first-born child, Meester Bowman. We will send a hungry Bengal tiger into the room unless you vote for Heekenlooper.
1: Are you voting for Heekenlooper?
Well, since you put it that way “maybe”
Ask me again using my second child as the example 😂
Colorado Pols diary headline, circa coming very soon? . . .
In all seriousness, Dio, those questions Bowman flagged are the most grotesque examples of "push polling" I've ever see n.
^^^this^^^
…and these people expect to be taken seriously??
My initial reaction was NFS! …this is a joke.
I wonder how many on this blog who cite the poll have read it?
That is an impressive list.
Unless there is some doubt about Hickenlooper's decision, why would there be this "pre-endorsement" from Perlmutter?
Why dunk on existing candidates?
Why not wait for the "decent interval" to mourn a Presidential campaign and announcement of a Senate campaign, and THEN jump in with an endorsement?
SuckingPoliticianing up to the corporate establishment powers that be, perhaps?. . . same as Alva.
Hey…access is everything.😉