U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 18, 2010 06:13 PM UTC

Rasmussen Pumps Maes, Tied With Hickenlooper in Latest Poll

  • 18 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

For what it’s worth, Rasmussen Reports, uh, reports:

The latest Rasmussen Reports telephone survey of Likely Voters in the state finds Republican frontrunner Scott McInnis again with a modest lead – 46% to 41% – over Democratic contender John Hickenlooper. Four percent (4%) prefer some other candidate in the race, and nine percent (9%) are undecided.

A month ago, McInnis earned 47% of the vote, while Hickenlooper picked up 41% support. The Republican led by similar margins in March and April.

Hickenlooper’s support remains at 41% in a match-up with business Dan Maes who is challenging McInnis for the GOP Senate nomination. Maes also gets 41% of the vote. Five percent (5%) like some one else in the race, while 13% remain undecided.

For those of you (us included) who have been critical in the past of Rasmussen’s polling, this is further indication of how there is something weird with their numbers. There’s just no way the average voter would match Dan Maes up with either John Hickenlooper or Scott McInnis. There’s no reason whatsoever that an average voter would know Dan Maes from Dan Marino, because Maes has no history of doing anything in the public eye in Colorado, and he has had no paid media presence.

H/T: People’s Press Collective

Comments

18 thoughts on “Rasmussen Pumps Maes, Tied With Hickenlooper in Latest Poll

  1. Maes has no history of doing anything in the public eye in Colorado, and he has had no paid media presence.

    All Maes has is talk radio….

    but not to worry, CP, if a tree falls in the forest and CP doesn’t hear it, then there is no noise…

    Wait a  minute, didn’t Maes beat McInnis at the state assembly????

    1. The point is Buck won 70%+ and Maes was courting the same vote Buck was and didn’t win 50% so that’s not a good sign when half your potential base doesn’t vote for you.  Second,

      Wait a  minute, didn’t Maes beat McInnis at the state assembly????

      this proves that Maes won’t win.  How can you expect to win if people still don’t know who you are and you have to tell people you won?  Needing to try and tell people that you are a front runner spells bad news in a statewide election.

      1. Because I believe that a key component to the republican strategy to turn colorado red is the constant refraim to dems that Maes/Buck  surges don’t mean anything….just ignore them….No one listens to talk radio and if Maes has parity with hickenlooper it must be a polling error….

        I, on the other hand, am scared shitless by the power of talk radio..controlled by republicans ….over 80 hours a week of LOCAL talk…

      2. because more (ignorant) young people are taking the side of the tea party.  Now don’t quote me on this, it’s just what I have been observing lately.  So yeah he may be “more ahead”, but that’s not going to last much longer when McInnis brings out his adds and Maes does not have enough money to afford adds.

  2. Am I so dense as to ask WTF with everyone pointing out the skewed, biased & unfounded Rasmussen poll #’s in one breath but continuing to quote & post them, therefore adding credence in the next?

    DON’T QUOTE RASMUSSEN!  I don’t believe anything could ever be factual at WorldNet Daily so I’d never use them as a source.  Same with Rasmussen.

    But no, either y’all to lazy to get off yer azzes look at other polls or Rasmussen is just feeding the beast & y’all eat at the trough.    

    1. Rasmussen is always way off all other polls cited on Real Clear Politics, sometimes by as many as 15 points to the right. So why keep citing Rasmussen?  I suppose because Rasmussen is most often available while some others are few and far between on local stuff. If Rasmussen shows a small lead for Mcinnis, that’s bad news for McInnis. Its presidential approval poll dated the 16th was the only one anywhere near a 15 point deficit.  Even that couldn’t quite pull the average into negative territory but they keep trying. Besides, wait until the real ad wars begin.  

    2. They’re polling and few other organizations are (at least at the frequency of Ras).

      Since we’re political junkies and we love to argue, and since the only thing most public polls are good for is to argue about, Ras fills that need quite nicely for us.

      Shit, if they were any good, we’d have less to argue about.

    3. I don’t believe there is much factual information from Huffington but you don’t see me parading around ;]

      From the people I see on Pols, I am sure most of them believe that Rasmussen is flawed.  Just take a look around the boards and chill out.

      1. A wide variety of polls appear every day here: http://www.realclearpolitics.c

        The polls cited reflect a wide political spectrum of pollsters, the site is certainly not left leaning and Rasmussen always stands out like a sore thumb, far from all other polls and from the average of all the cited polls, though it exerts a powerful skewing effect on that average. Rasmussen is a joke.

        1. Perfect persistent examples of Rasmussen’s BS results.  

          Rasmussen also consistently polls right up to week of election/amendment trying to nudge voters but never, never follows up in exit polls or with critical review of their run-up numbers.  Rasmussen = RW tool, so why not always quote Ras w/ a qualifying statement regarding their crapshoot results?  

          1. Rasmussen is almost never in the same ball park as any of the other polls or even across the street from the ballpark.  And that includes compared to Fox polls. Often, with local stuff, for a given week or even month they are pretty much the only poll out there with others operating much less frequently.  I’d say, it’s pretty safe to subtract half a dozen points from the right on any Rasmussen poll between left and right candidates or approval ratings, just for starters.

    1. That would tend to explain Maes seeming popularity.

      Two factors also at play here — “likely voters” are over-represented by the party activists, and Ras doesn’t define the weighting used (how many GOP vs. Independent vs. Dem).

      So it’s trivial to spin the dial on the outcome just about any way they want.

    1. That is the number of registered Republicans. Coincidence? I’m beginning to doubt it.

      Don’t know if that helps any GOP candidate in the general, but you’re right that Norton and McInnis are working their tails off at appealing to the Tea Party.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

67 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!