President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%↑

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd

(D) Adam Frisch

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

52%↑

48%↓

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 19, 2010 12:43 AM UTC

Peter Boyles, with King and Tancredo on air with him, rips Cory Gardner

  • 62 Comments
  • by: BobMoore

(A few swift kicks to the groin of Cory Gardner – promoted by Colorado Pols)

Emotions have been building all week since congressional candidate Cory Gardner canceled a fundraiser that would have featured Iowa Rep. Steve King, and the subsequent decision by the Northern Colorado Tea Party to disinvite King from a rally.

But things went over the top Friday morning on Peter Boyles’ talk show on KHOW-630 AM. Boyles was joined by King and former Congressman Tom Tancredo and spent an hour hammering Gardner and the Northern Colorado Tea Party.

“Pussies is the correct word I think we’re looking for here, and a bunch of punk-ass that think they’re going to run for and make a difference,” Boyles said of Gardner and the tea party group.

(Note: this originally was published at Coloradoan.com here: http://bit.ly/d6jnxB. Listen to the full audio here: http://www.coloradoan.com/news…

Among other highlights, Boyles, King and Tancredo called Gardner’s campaign headquarters to invite him to an alternative rally that was set up for Saturday in Loveland after King got blackballed from the others.

“I’m sure Cory would love to show up and meet the guys,” Boyles said.

Colorado radio listeners got treated to an hour of a prominent conservative talk show host, a sitting Republican member of Congress and a former GOP member of Congress bashing one of the party’s most touted candidates for the fall. Gardner is challenging freshman Democrat Betsy Markey.

“I still hope that Cory Gardner wins the general election, but I’m telling you I hope that when he wins this thing, I hope he shows more spine in Congress than he does in this particular case,” Tancredo said.

 

King said: “It’s interesting that there’s only one Republican in America who’s distanced himself from me that’s either elected office or nominated to office, only one.”

That’s not quite true. When the Northern Colorado Tea Party disinvited King, a spokesman for Republican Senate candidate Ken Buck (a tea party favorite) said: “”His (King’s) comments do not represent the tea party.”

The sentiment on Gardner’s decision to cancel the King fundraiser is far from unanimous. Jon Nicholas, a conservative radio talk show host in Estes Park, had a column in the Estes Park Trail-Gazette saluting Gardner’s decision.

“The decision by Gardner and the Northern Colorado Tea Party group demonstrates that Colorado conservatives aren`t interested in playing the game of racial divide. There are major policy differences dividing President Obama from conservatives. King`s statements simply distract from the real issues. Conservatives can ill afford to re-argue the merits of the ‘beer summit’ with the economy at stake. The health care bill, cap & trade, expanding federal control of education, the Gulf oil spill response, foreign policy issues — the list goes on and on. King goes on and on about race.”

UPDATE: NoCo Tea Party Director Lesley Hollywood responds to the criticism being aimed at her: http://bit.ly/9LvPAm

Comments

62 thoughts on “Peter Boyles, with King and Tancredo on air with him, rips Cory Gardner

  1. No matter how conservative someone is, no matter how badly they need the seat that the candidate is running for, Republicans cannot resist calling each other RINOs.

    Not surprising that they haven’t gone after Ken Buck yet considering how badly they need him, but Cory has got to be steamed about this kind of treatment. Does King not know that Gardner is one of the NRCC’s “Young Guns”?

    It’s like an addiction. They can’t help but purify their candidates, even when they’re vital to their party’s success.

    1. but most wait until AFTER they seize power.

      In this case, the Uber-right is starting its Stalin purge trial phase before they take office.  

        Even Hitler waited until he held the reins of power to purge Roehm, the Strasser Brothers and others who actually did believe the “socialist” part of National Socialism.

         

    2. Keep in mind that Boyles is better off with Republicans losing. Tancredo just wants attention, and King gets elected by being a total dick. They’re not trying to do what’s best for Republican governance, they’re trying to do what is best for the 3 little pigs.

      And kudos to Gardner & the tea party for doing the right thing. This can’t be fun for them and they deserve credit for standing up to the racists.

  2. There are basically two camps of people.

    One group says that we should not let the left wing media misrepresent King’s comments; we should stand up and defend him. Throwing him under the bus is cowardly. The other group realizes this is an election year and doesn’t want to see the Tea Party get dragged into another discussion of race. They want to stay focused on the core issues of limited government, fiscal responsibility, and strict adherence to the Constitution, because the Tea Party can win on these issues.

    Outsiders may scoff at King and those who would defend them, but they seem to be those who view politics from a strategic point of view rather than a ideological point of view. They don’t understand that for many people the Tea Party is as much or more about remaining true to their principals and values as getting elected. They see the countless people, on both the left and the right, who have sold out to corporate and special interests, putting electability over their principles, and want none of it. For these people, canceling King’s appearance is an act of political cowardice and expediency.

    On the whole, I don’t think this big “split” is really going to help Democrats any. It’s such a minor issue that it is not going to cause people to stay home and not vote for Gardner. They know that he represents 90% of their views and they certainly want Markey out of there for her vote on health care.

    1. I disagree.  This is going to help Markey big time.  People who agree with Tancredo are a small percentage, but as a percentage of Republican activists and donors they are bigger.  A campaign that can’t recruit enough volunteers will have a very difficult time winning.  When the family conversation turns to politics those people will shrug and talk about something else.  It’s going to be a long night in November.

  3. From a general email this afternoon:

    This rally is not the appropriate forum for this discussion, which Congressman King clearly stated to me in a phone conversation that he had no problem bringing this conversation to our forum in Colorado or into the Tea Party.  When I disagreed with him he told me to get a spine.

    Maintaining the integrity of the pro-liberty organizations, the candidates and causes we support, and the battles we have won is far more important to me than one speaker at one rally and Congressman Steve King from Iowa’s opinions.

    I stand by my statement that the race debate does not belong in the NoCo Tea Party. There are higher roads to be taken and no reason to stoop to the level of the hypocrites who call us racist. I believe educating Americans of all races about the importance of limited government, individual liberties, and the Constitution is the higher road.  If racial division is a concern of yours, I encourage you to have these discussion in a different forum or as individuals, but let’s not let it divert from our mission or the importance of the Tea Party message of promoting fiscal responsibility, limited government, and free enterprise.

    If you have feedback regarding this situation, I encourage you to reply to this email with your response.

    In Freedom,

    Lesley Hollywood

    1. The Wall Street Meltdown of 2008 was a chilling reminder that unregulated capitalism isn’t Nirvana.  The Gulf of Mexico oil spill showed that government is needed in situations where private enterprise is unable to fix problems that they have created.  The debate shouldn’t be about limited government.  It should be about effective government.  Until conservatives can tell the difference between the two they will never be able to govern effectively.  All they can do is let corporations run buck wild and eliminate public programs that help people.

                1. except to point out that the “economic downturn” mentioned above was brought about, in large measure, by the bilking of a couple trillion bucks out of us (the consumer) at the gas pump. When oil ran up to $147.00/bbl. and gas hit $5.00, the hedge fund managers, ins. co investors, and oil and gas companies made a killing…and almost killed our nation in the bargain.  

                  1. Which dethroned Gray Davis, gave the world Arnold, and was indeed found to have been the work of Enron and other companies.

                    One of the few times I recall Paul Krugman to be wrong.  IIRC, he said there was no manipulation of the markets.

    2. If the Tea Party has any sort of future, it will be because of people like her, not provocateurs and “pussies” (their offensive word) like Boyles, Tancredo and King.

    3. What battles have the No CO Tea party won so far?

      I understand they have pro-liberty organizations, they have some candidates and causes, but have they won anything so far?

      Besides that, nice job Lesley.

  4. That said I actually came out of this experience with more respect for Cory.  How hard must it be for a politician to not sell out their general decency to win an election. I think he has resisted that urge. I have slammed him many times before but am happy to see him make this call.  I have known Corry since he was a little boy. Not well but I know him and his family.  Nice guy. Don’t like his politics but nice guy.  The Repugs will hurt themselves more than the MSM has understood by this tea party thing.  Markey has a target on her back I was worried. Not so worried any more.  Stay true.

    Best regards,

    Tim

    “The arc of the moral universe is long but it bends towards justice.”

    Martin Luther King Junior 1965

      1. Gardner is only covering his own ass. Gardner has been pandering to the birthers and teabaggers for the last year.

        He’s an opportunist; pure and simple.  

          1. David, the guy’s past was about five minutes earlier when he invited King to his fundraiser, despite a record of saying things like the Obama comment on a regular basis. Face it – Gardner knew who King was when he invited him in the first place and disinviting him was hasty damage control. He’s also clammed up about why he disinvited King — hardly a profile in courage.

            Gardner did a less damaging thing. To call it a “good thing” is ludicrous.

  5. King entire quote is more damming that just the out take.

    Boyles played the entire King statement, and this is what I heard King saying:

    King said on the Gordon Liddy (convicted felon) show that the black panthers standing outside a voting place  in Phila was “hands down the worst case of voter intimidation in US history.”  He is erasing a 100 years of Jim Crow law, poll taxes; literacy tests, and people losing jobs for attempting to vote, to say nothing of the murders. He is attempting to rewrite African American struggles to say nothing of our real history.  That is racist in the extreme.

        1. Somebody else brought his name up, but the comparison to a terrorist rings hollow. As far as I know, he’s not out there blowing people up.

          1. that no matter the religion, it will have zealots.

            Osama BinLaden = Muslim

            Fred Phelps = Christian

            they BOTH advocate death to infidels or people who do not believe the same as they do.

            NOT surprised you missed that BJob.

                  1. But let’s be honest.  A twisted minority (which unfortunately is probably still 100 million or so) of Muslims wholeheartedly buy in to spreading the religion by the sword.

                    There is no contemporary equivalent in Christianity.  Not even close.

                    1. … and spreading some neocon’s definition of “freedom” and “judeo-christian principles” isn’t the contemporary equivalent?

                    2. Our mission isn’t to spread Judeo-Christianity.  In Afghanistan, we are trying at least to help them come out of the 8th century and create a viable nation.  It looks like a lost cause, unfortunately.  They’d prefer to throw acid on girls that have the audacity to want to go to school and blow up thousand-year-old statues of Buddha so their religion isn’t so threatened.

                    3. The mission was to find and destroy AQ.

                      We found ’em, failed to destroy them, now they’re in Pakistan.

                      We have no reason to be there except to impose our form of government on a tribal culture that has resisted similar attempts for centuries.

                    4. I have a pretty harsh solution for that that I’d be okay with, but I can’t say I disagree with you.

                    5. Atlanta Olympics bomb, several abortion clinic bombs, lesbian bar bomb.  Not as effective as some in terms of body count, but he did his best.  Roman Catholic, and associated with the Christian Identity sect.  His motivation was certainly religious.

                    6. As opposed to the hundreds of thousands of Jihadists we’ve been lucky enough to send on to their way the last decade?

                      It’s not even the same universe.

      1. Dwyer’s comment neither attacks nor defends Black Panthers per se. Leaving that aside for the moment, I believe he’s pointing out that King is saying that some black panthers standing around is the worst case of voter intimidation ever, the worst thing he’s ever heard of.  Considering all the far worse instances in the history of violence and discriminatory laws used to suppress, deny, intimidate and terrorize African Americans and deprive them of the right to vote altogether, he must either be a racist or a completely ignorant fool.  Not that he can’t be both and dumb as a rock, too.

          1. Every once in awhile you say it about better than anybody else. I particularly enjoyed this one:

            Boyles…the Willie Loman of the airwaves.

            If that doesn’t become a sig line, I don’t know what deserves to around here.

  6. I used to listen to him, in fact, when 9/11 happened.  (“Hmmm….this is odd, a plane has hit one of the World Trade towers.” Like the Kennedy assassination, I guess we never forget.)  

    Yeah, he was hung up on JonBonet Ramsey, but his schtick was less political and more just general social, current events, and even some good works.

    I’ve not listened to him in years, but it sure sounds like he’s found better ratings, or he’s found a Tea Party soul in his old age.  

    Speaking of, isn’t he ancient by now?  

    1. He is looking at seventy in a few years and he never made the big time.  He’s been doing talk radio for almost forty years and it must be tough to watch the younger guys….Beck, Limbaugh, Hannity, etc….become famous and rich and he is still plugging away in Denver……..

      Silverman is the talk show jockey that writes for Huffington Post and Fox News calls up when the national station wants a story from denver…….never boyles. But he does have twenty hours of airtime a week and is a local power broker…..I believe that ritter declined to run for a second term because of boyles relentless attacks.  I also think that ken buck and dan maes owe their political popularity to boyles, IMHO.

      boyles  has embraced the birther people, the tea partyers, the 9/12ers etc…..he is a minor player on the right wing circuit…..he is a pathetic and bitter old man still trying to grab the brass ring….the Willie Loman of the airwaves….

      he pretty much specializes in personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with him on anything….

    1. To some of us, it doesn’t have a damned thing to do with genitalia.  I apologize for others’ unfortunate choice of words that pissed you off.

      Some of us just feel comfortable around women.  I had two wives; raised two daughters, three female dogs, and a female hedgehog.  Even the fish in the fish tank were females. Genitalia never entered into the picture.

      I just like (and have always done my best to try to understand) females.  I guess I just love solving puzzles.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

178 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!