U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 11, 2019 03:08 PM UTC

Is Cory Gardner Done?

  • 10 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

JAMES CARVILLE: That poor guy, I don’t think he is vulnerable, I think he’s done. He ought to just drop out of the race.

Sen. Cory Gardner (R).

In the past 24 hours, Sen. Cory Gardner of Colorado has transitioned from merely the nation’s most vulnerable Republican Senator up for re-election in 2020 into a living metaphor for the Republican Party’s inability to hold President Donald Trump accountable as Trump’s chaotic presidency barrels toward catastrophe.

Gardner was not the only vulnerable Republican caught giving completely unsatisfactory answers to reporters about impeachment inquiry dominating national headlines, but Gardner’s evasive and increasingly hostile interaction with FOX 31’s Joe. St. George and 9NEWS’ Anusha Roy seems to have struck a nerve like few other moments in Gardner’s career. This was hardly Gardner’s first go-round trying to manage a bad Trump story, but after these two competing reporters tag-teamed to prevent Gardner from changing the subject his “torture to watch” evasions became the functional equivalent of pleading guilty. The Hill’s Jordain Carney captured the moment well:

When the reporter tried to follow up to ask again if Gardner thought it was appropriate, Gardner said that he had answered the question and turned to another reporter.

After the second reporter asked Gardner if his answer was “yes or no,” the GOP senator pivoted to talking about House Democrats’ impeachment inquiry and told reporters they were focusing on politics…

The clip of the back-and-forth between Garner and reporters quickly garnered attention from national media, Gardner’s 2020 rivals and even Trump, who liked a tweet from a Bloomberg reporter weighing in on a video of Gardner’s comments. [Pols emphasis]

Given the extent of the backfire, perhaps Gardner’s performance was worse than pleading guilty.

One of the recurring comments we’ve seen in response to yesterday’s punishing back-and-forth is that it was an “uncharacteristic” reaction from a Senator who has established a reputation for staying composed no matter what he’s confronted with. But yesterday Gardner’s mask slipped, and in addition to getting visibly irritated in the clip now seen by the whole country he had this telling separate exchange with 9NEWS’ Anusha Roy:

Folks, that is not how a happy politician interacts with the press.

In 2014, Gardner powered through scrutiny of his record by audaciously re-inventing himself and successfully turning liabilities into sympathetic backlash against his “overly negative” opponent. Five years later, Gardner can’t count on any of that–and the “message discipline” that helped Gardner eke out his 1.9% win in 2014 is blowing up in Gardner’s face.

Cory Gardner has never faced anything quite like this before. In a way, this problem is worse than Gardner’s underwater poll numbers, since losing credibility with the media makes it much harder to recover lost support. And while we don’t expect Gardner to take James Carville’s advice today…the thought has to have crossed his mind by now.

Comments

10 thoughts on “Is Cory Gardner Done?

  1. At the end of the second quarter, Morning Consult's polling had Gardner at 37% approve, 26% don't know, 37% disapprove.  A Senator, nearly the only state-wide Republican winner in the state, clearly a major force in the Colorado Republican Party — and a quarter of the voters "don't know" whether they approve or not.

    In August, shortly after Hickenlooper dropped into the Senate race, an Emerson poll showed him with a 13% lead on Gardner, with only 8% undecided. And since then Gardner's been in the news.  Over, and over, and over again, with news that does not seem helpful to his campaign.

    Other than a spectacular implosion of Hick, anyone have a scenario where Cory suddenly appeals to Colorado and he wins another election?  Asking for a friend, yaknow.

    1. When is the deadline for someone filing for a primary on him? A day doesn’t go by without the talking heads saying the Republican senators will grow a spine the day they know they won’t/can’t be primaried. 

        1. I think their Maes-Tancredo love triangle was just a little too fresh in their minds then. But you're right, highly unlikely anyone takes him on this time.  

          Still doesn't answer my question of when the primary deadline is in Colorado.  I suppose I could find it myself but it's easier just to ask you 🙂 

  2. This is all fun, watching the shade-throwing and the bad press, but it would be foolish to get overconfident and count Gardner out right now. At the bare minimum, unless the Cardboard Candidate really quits he will still be on the ballot with an R after his name which will get him automatic votes in parts of Colorado. Stakes are far too high – control or 50-50 in the Senate, Supreme Court confirmations – for anyone to slack off and assume Conman's defeat is a sure thing just yet.

        1. I think you are being overly optimistic, V.

          Sadly Tillis gets re-elected. I've driven the road between Fayetteville and the North Carolina coast several times and each time, I was amazed at the number of baptist churches every 500 feet along the way. 

          I think Joni Ernst is in more danger of losing than Tillis.

          How I'd love to see Roy Moore as the nominee in AL again! But I don't think they will make that mistake again. Even Trump is warning his deplorables not to do it.

           

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

191 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!