President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Biden*

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 19, 2010 10:56 PM UTC

Good Money After Bad, Hasan Foundation Edition

  • 11 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

Attention this past week has rightly focused on GOP gubernatorial candidate Scott McInnis’ plagiarism in a series of essays on water policy in Colorado–not as much on the alleged victims of said plagiarism, the Hasan Family Foundation, a charity operated by the Hasan family of major Republican donors. The Hasans responded quickly with anger over the allegations of plagiarism, demanded repayment in full of the monies paid to McInnis, and have never once tried to defend McInnis from the allegations. That’s all to their credit.

Some questions are beginning to emerge, though, such as why the Hasan Foundation developed a sudden interest in water policy when that’s not the stated mission of the organization. There are obvious questions about how rigorously the organization followed up on McInnis’ deliverables, having paid $300,000 for essays from a prominent Republican that were never even published. The two questions combine to form a much bigger one: was this just a patronage gift? Might nervousness about possible IRS questions regarding their prodigious ‘charity’ for an ex-Republican congressman have supplemented their outrage?

And as Westword’s Alan Prendergast reports, there are other reasons to criticize what the Hasans do with their money–like serving as the biggest (known) donors to Amendments 60, 61 and Proposition 101, known together as the “Dr. Evil” initiatives.

Members of the Hasan family, the wealthy backers of Colorado GOP causes, whose award of a $300,000 fellowship to Scott McInnis erupted last week in a plagiarism scandal, are also the largest single donors to three tax-cutting initiatives on the November ballot.

The measures — Amendments 60 and 61 and Proposition 101 — have been charged with controversy, in part because of the unusual secrecy surrounding the financial backing of the joint campaign…

The latest campaign finance reports filed with the Colorado Secretary of State indicate that Muhammad Ali Hasan, former Westword cover dude, donated $5,000 to the 60-61-101 campaign shortly before announcing his departure from Colorado on his Facebook page (he’s headed back to the film business in LA). His mother, Seeme Hasan, made another $5,000 contribution to the campaign in May.

It’s almost funny, don’t you think? The Hasans just care so much about water policy, they are backing initiatives that would ensure Colorado can never finance a water project again! ‘Educating the public’ is good, so let’s write McInnis a $300,000 check for “educational” work he plagiarized, then fund initiatives that would eviscerate education funding! Makes perfect sense, doesn’t it?

Come to think of it, the Hasans backing Doug Bruce’s “Dr. Evil” initiatives does have a simple, easy-to-understand relationship to McInnis’ plagiarism. Very bad judgment.

Comments

11 thoughts on “Good Money After Bad, Hasan Foundation Edition

  1. They wanted his thoughts.  He used all his resourses to give them the best available.  I think they were just rewarding him and letting others know what to expect.  Then they made sure bad news, similiar to what would be remembered from a CU professor, was released.  Politians are not professors and should’t have the same criteria to be measured against.  McInnis must have had a falling out.  If only politicians with original, well thought out positions were to be considered,  their supply would be diminished greatly and they might even be considered endangered.

    1. The Hasans wanted something they could publish or post on the web.  McInnis gave them plagiarized content, which made the product defective considering its intended use.

      This isn’t a conspiracy to screw Scott McInnis.  He screwed himself.

        1. Why didn’t they vet the piece sooner? They were happy to have parted with $300K for this long without protest until an enterprising young journalist blew the lid off the story?

          So how does one go about suggesting to the IRS to investigate the expenditures of a non=profit organization? There must be a hot-line I suspect, huh?

  2. at westword was the reporter, I think, not Michael Roberts. And it’s judgment not judgement.

    (I think I saw Pols writing this post on an iPhone from the counter at our local dispensary!)

    Needless to say, anyone who gives $300 K to Scott McInnis to write articles on water policy is (a) not paying for anything like education or research and (b) has millions to throw away. Should the Dr Evil initiatives pass, the Hasans will likely make back McInnis’s ridiculous fellowship money in tax savings in no time. All the better to spend it on more crap politics.  

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

131 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!