President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
July 24, 2010 02:58 AM UTC

Anyone remember what the DPS School Board is there for?

  • 15 Comments
  • by: lauriehzeller

Recent revelations about Andrea Merida’ position as a paid consultant to a political campaign raise serious ethical concerns about her status as a public official serving the children and families of Denver. Just as important, it highlights that recent Board of Education meetings have been hamstrung by distractions from the real work of Denver Public Schools.

 

Andrea Merida’s recent Denver Post guest commentary suggested that the district’s reform strategies were disrespecting the city’s neighborhoods and their residents.  Ms. Merida suggests neighborhood loyalty is “the fundamental point”.  Actually, the fundamental point of DPS is to provide great educational opportunities for public school students.  For chronically failing schools, the “fundamental point” should be profound change in the culture, operations, personnel and expectations of a school.

Ms. Merida applauds the BOE vote to suspend new schools in Northwest Denver as a victory for neighborhoods. In NW Denver schools, eighty percent of seats are rated as low-performing on the School Performing Framework. What Ms. Merida suggests is a victory for those neighborhoods represents defeat for our students.

Parents in NW Denver get it – 46% percent of NW students are already exercising choice and opting out of their neighborhood schools.

Ms. Merida’s message on this topic was typical of her conduct as a BOE member in her seven months of service. She has repeatedly introduced topics and concerns of questionable significance in Board meetings, distracting the BOE from their real work. In the name of defending her constituents, or promoting transparency, she has repeatedly taken valuable BOE time that could be spent on addressing the needs of English Language learners, raising our third graders’ reading scores, or other important district priorities.

The work of the Board of Education is more important than any one election cycle or candidate. I challenge Andrea to focus on improving options for Denver students, and stop using her position as a megaphone for her political agenda.  

Comments

15 thoughts on “Anyone remember what the DPS School Board is there for?

  1. I’m pretty sure there’s no recall process, but certain;y some public shaming is in order.  Maybe just multiple attendees wearing white t-shirts bearing the words “BUYING MERIDA COSTS JUST $5K!” or something like that? Low cost, high impact, and they couldn’t kick you out without losing a First Amendment lawsuit.

  2. do we pay these people?  Can we not pay these people and instead pay teachers what they should be making?

    If people like Andrea Merida and Theresa Pena want to talk about issues at DPS, wonderful.  Our schools need it.  If they want to use it as a fighting ground for Romanoff and Bennet, they should be ashamed.

    If they both want to say there is no connection between their work on the school board and their work on the campaigns, they should leave the campaigns (or the school board)

  3. Anytime you see a political hatchet job like this, you know a paid political hack is behind it.

    Zeller is a taxpayer subsidized hack working for A+ Denver, a sham group designed to create false consensus to support DPS administrative miscues.

    Less parse this puppy a piece at a time. Zeller’s “ethical concerns” canard has no specifics- and lacks the important disclosure that Theresa Pena, also a DPS board member, is the campaign treasurer and a surrogate for Michael Bennet’s Senate campaign. Surely, if Zeller has no concerns about Pena, the same should go for Merida.

    Zeller, and many of her ilk, don’t grasp the importance of neighborhood public schools. And since she is not a parent, and not directly involved in public schools, I guess that is understandable.

    And Ms. Zeller, i invite you to actually visit some of these North Denver schools with me, so you can actually get an idea of what you are addressing.  As for the community planning process Zeller criticizes, it what the product of Bennet supporter Mary Seawell and Romanoff supporter Arturo Jimenez, and passed the board unamimously. As a parent in North Denver, like most of my compadres, I loudly applaud the action. Funnily enough, Zeller doesn’t mind the similar process taking place in NE Denver, where her organization has a stake.

    Lastly, Zeller, what exactly are the issues Merida has introduced that are of “questionable significance?” Are they questionable to a paid political hatchetwoman, or are the questionable to Merida’s constituents and the taxpayers of Denver? The answer, of course, is the former.

    Zeller, until you have real skin in the game of DPS education, keep your baseless, even mindless, political attacks confined to the proper theater of operations.

    Zeller’s group, paid for by a group of rich charter school zealots, is, as one would expect, subsidized by the taxpayers.  

    1. 1. My employer, A+ Denver, is a nonprofit advocacy organization with a point of view. I blog under my own name here occasionally because I happen to share that point of view and want to be personally accountable for it.

      2. A public official’s being paid to be an advocate, and a private citizen being paid to be an advocate, represent two different standards.

      3. Everyone in Denver has skin in the game in DPS, Guerin, whether we have children in the system or not. Not that it is any of your business, but both my children graduated from DPS.

      4. Ms. Pena’s position with a campaign appears in public on every piece of campaign stationary. Ms. Merida’s position with a campaign was disclosed only this past week by an investigative journalist.

      5. The implications of the NW Denver vote about which I raised concern was the inability to provide new school options in an area of the city where so many schools are failing Denver’s children, not the community process.

      6. The rules of the game for a debate on Coloradopols exclude personal attacks. Maybe you should review them before you post again.

  4. Glad to see that DPS is now another arena for the Romanoff/Bennet cage match.  Keep your eyes on the prize folks!  It’s all about your campaigns; forget the kids.

    This is all so disgusting. F-minuses for everyone involved.

  5. I think Ms. Zeller’s point here was about transparency; she’s willing to post and comment under her own name; Ms. Pena is pretty transparent about her activities.  Ms. Merida was not.

    And perhaps Ms. Merida did not intend for her paid involvement to look suspect, but she would have had at least some respect for saying, “yes, I’m being paid but this is what I believe.”  Now it looks slightly smarmy.

    While I’m at it?  A minor point?  There is NO reason to think that just because a school is traditional, it’s bad; or that because it’s a charter school, it’s bad, either.  

    There are some amazing schools and educators out there, at charter and traditional alike.

    So don’t paint with too broad a brush — that Ms. Zeller must be an idiot because her organization sometimes supports charter schools; or that Theresa Pena is bad because she supported MLK remaining traditional but gave the school more independence.  And before you paint me? I have two active teachers in my family (one on the West side), three retired teachers; I spent several years profiling excellent public and private schools in two different TV series and one staff development series on best practices in education and education reform, and I’ve sat on two CSCs and a bunch of thankless committees.  Like most of the folks commenting here, I do care alot as well.  So chill, please.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

77 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!