U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 21, 2019 11:00 AM UTC

It Doesn't Matter What Cory Gardner Thinks About Weed

  • 22 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Mitch McConnell, Cory Gardner.

As Westword’s Thomas Mitchell reports, legislation to end the federal blanket prohibition on marijuana and legitimize states like Colorado who have legalized cannabis is moving through the Democratic-controlled House:

The Marijuana Opportunity Reinvestment and Expungement Act of 2019, better known as the MORE Act, would end federal marijuana prohibition while allowing states to regulate the plant as they see fit, as well as set up funding and programs that allow expungement for cannabis offenders and social equity within any potential federally legal pot industry.

Introduced by New York Representative Jerry Nadler, a Democrat, the MORE Act passed 24-10 out of the House Judiciary Committee, setting up a future vote on the House floor. However, Nadler’s role as Judiciary Committee chairman enabled the bill’s quick markup, and Republican representatives don’t seem to think the bill would receive Senate approval if it passes the House. [Pols emphasis] Before the vote, several brought up the States Act, a Senate bill that would leave marijuana legalization to states.

Colorado Congressman Ken Buck unsuccessfully tried attaching the States Act as an amendment to the MORE Act, claiming the Senate isn’t likely to touch the latter.

The States Act, as our toker-friendly readers know, is legislation in the U.S. Senate that would similarly leave the regulation of cannabis up to individual states. A key difference between the States Act, which has bipartisan support in the Senate including both of Colorado’s U.S. Senators, and the MORE Act is that federal law enforcement would still be able to bring federal charges under the States Act over marijuana violations in states where the drug remains illegal.

The biggest problem with the passage of either bill, however, remains Republican Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell–who has remained a steadfast opponent of THC-bearing cannabis even while loosening his position on industrial non-narcotic hemp cultivation. McConnell claims that hemp and cannabis grown for consumption are “two entirely separate plants,” deeming marijuana to be hemp’s “illicit cousin, which I choose not to embrace.” McConnell’s opposition to marijuana legalization is effectively a roadblock to any legislation to end federal prohibition–and the legislative fight in the Senate may center on the more limited SAFE Banking Act, to free up banking services for legal marijuana businesses in legalized states who are dangerously forced to do their business in cash.

The point in all this, which we’ve made previously about other issues on which local Republicans feint to the center like healthcare and immigration, is that Sen. Cory Gardner’s longstanding lip service to supporting the end of federal prohibition of marijuana is hobbled by the Republican Senate leadership Gardner voted into power. Gardner can tell Colorado’s marijuana stakeholders whatever he wants, but if he’s not willing to force a showdown over the issue with his own Republican leadership, Gardner’s platitudes on this and every other subject are meaningless.

At the end of the day, you dance with the one who brung you.

Tweet
Share

Comments

22 thoughts on “It Doesn’t Matter What Cory Gardner Thinks About Weed”

  2. Who knew that McConnell's background included biology, specifically botany????

    help and cannabis grown for consumption are “two entirely separate plants,” deeming marijuana to be hemp’s “illicit cousin, which I choose not to embrace.”

    Add yet another House bill to the long list sitting in McConnell's desk drawer, out of sight and mostly out of the media's mind.

     

    1. Ummm no, Mitch. Not entirely two separate plants. They are both Cannabis sativa. You have a chihuahua, I have a St Bernard. They’re both dogs.

      Try again. 

  3. This is an issue that I strongly disagree with our otherwise excellent Sen. Gardner on. Marijuana is a harmful drug that shouldn't be legal, and Gardner has nothing to gain by pandering to druggies who will probably find some other reason to vote Democrat anyway.

    2. For someone who claims to hate marijuana, you seem extremely high on your own supply.  Calling Senator Gardner "excellent" just proves it.  

      But, hey, I know how confident you are in Gardner's reelection.  Why don't you just say he's going to get reelected.  Just like Governor Cynthia Coffman, and Attorney General George Brauchler.

      1. I agree that marijuana is less harmful than alcohol.  And cutting off your thumb is more harmful than cutting off your little finger.  

        but why cut off either finger?  And why becloud your mind with marijuana?

        I firmly support legalizing marijuana because prohibition is a catastrophe.  But that doesn't change the fact that excessive use of marijuana or alcohol gives you shit for brains.

        1. But that doesn't change the fact that excessive use of marijuana or alcohol gives you shit for brains.

          Which is why I think Nutlid must be a pothead, or an alcoholic. 

          1. My bet is that moddy drinks a fifth of vodka a day.  He thinks nobody can smell it on his breath.  But the fact that he often has his shoes on the wrong foot is a solid clue!

  4. Perhaps Moderatus can explain how marijuana is arguably less addictive than either tobacco or alcohol, and remains illegal, while tobacco and alcohol are legal.

        2. So that really has been Nunes' motivation through out Robert Mueller, the Russia investigation and now Ukraine? I just figured his obsession with the alleged pee pee video was a SNL running joke.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

135 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!