This Saturday on the west steps of the Colorado State Capitol, a “We Will Not Comply” rally is scheduled to be hosted by pro-gun activists and Rep. Shane Sandridge of Colorado Springs, “to stand against Colorado’s dangerous & unconstitutional RED FLAG LAW (emphasis theirs) before it goes into effect January 2020.” Pro-gun rallies at the state capitol are common enough (and sparsely-attended enough) that they generally don’t warrant a mention, but with the new extreme risk protection order (ERPO) or “red flag” law set to take effect in Colorado at the beginning of January, Saturday’s rally does have some added significance.
Notably, the event does not have listed as any of its scheduled speakers as of this writing one of the state’s elected county sheriffs who have controversially declared their intent to ignore the ERPO law when it takes effect next month, which could expose those officials to sanctions including contempt of court in addition to allowing potentially disastrous public safety risks with both political and human costs. Colorado is not the only state with a red flag law, but the open defiance of a few local officials here has been a distinguishing feature of the debate.
And that got us to thinking: what exactly does it mean for individual citizens to declare they “will not comply” with the ERPO law? Does this mean they would not utilize the law to prevent a family member from harming themselves? Does it mean they would they not surrender their own guns if ordered to do so via an ERPO? Are they suggesting persons subject to an ERPO should…resist? The legal questions and liabilities are different from those faced by law enforcement, but with the ERPO law about to take effect it’s time to have a sober conversation about what this kind of rhetoric actually translates to in the real world.
Because in a few weeks this law, supported overwhelmingly by the public in every poll, is going to be real.
We predict that a good deal of the rhetoric against the law in the past year will not age well.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: A Person
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Genghis
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Wednesday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: Ben Folds5
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: spaceman2021
IN: Thursday Open Thread
BY: A Person
IN: Thursday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
The "Hell No Beto Mom?" I love how these people derive their identity from who they hate.
Leslie Hollywood and "America's Mom" (haha) look like every white lady who's ever called the cops on a black picnic.
No Sheriffs No Dudley? No Nevilles? No Marble?
Not even a Saine?
What kind of half-assed gun-fest is this?!
[checks invite]
Oh wait, at least there's this guy:
OMG this vile doucherocket is back from Oregon?
Who is that?
I would love to see some footage of the non event.
The facebook page had
183 Went · 770 Interested
Full video of speakers at https://www.facebook.com/rallyforourrights/videos/482446495728163/
Local television coverage (1:14 minutes) at http://www.9news.com/video/news/politics/colorados-red-flag-law-officially-starts-next-month/73-8d12f7b4-8d10-4321-974b-6335d3b7a44f?jwsource=cl
claim by the organizers on their FB page "We’re at about 300 right now."
Coat drive? Shouldn't they be shilling "magazines" or something?
I'm looking forward to learning about the "real solutions" on offer. Suppose they will find a solution more effective than ERPO would have been for the law enforcement personnel wounded and killed that triggered the Douglas County sheriff to promote ERPO? Or any of the documented "success" stories from Oregon found in https://olis.leg.state.or.us/liz/2017I1/Downloads/CommitteeMeetingDocument/150782