U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
December 18, 2019 08:19 AM UTC
15 Comments
Look out Guvs, there's got to be a few Crisanta diehards out there still. 🙂
DeGette already made history as #5 of the top 10 dumbest anti gun quotes made by a politician. Good to see her standing up for the Constitution now that it suits her needs.
So, we are talking about a President trying to extort a foreign power into subverting the United States, and you show up to talk about guns and your sense of entitlement around them.
Bless his heart, for he hath not read DC v. Heller.
Bless your heart, for ye clearly hath not watched the video…..
And yet, you still haven't read DC v. Heller, which is, you know, actual law.
Oh, the actual law that asserts the sorts of weapons protected are those "in common use"? (Yawn)Yeah never heard of it…..we did this in '13 where were you?
Litigating constitutional cases. And Heller was '08. But thanks for playing
We had this debate in '13 after Sandy Hook. Degette seemed to think banning magazines was effective because once they were shot, they could not be reused. It's clear by your posts above you expect a working knowledge of an issue as a prerequisite to debate, so I can't help but think you would expect a legislator to know what they are banning before they ban it, right?
And being full of originalists, I'm sure the Supreme Court would endorse every household having a black powder musket, flintlock pistol, or Kentucky rifle.
It baffles me to have the Court rule about weapons in "common use," when the firepower of a single individual today is the equivalent of a good sized military unit back then. Casualties at Las Vegas ["killed 58 people and wounded 413, with the ensuing panic bringing the injury total to 869"] would have put it among the top ten battles of the Revolutionary War counted by American casualties (coming in a bit ahead of Battle of Bunker Hill, June 17, 1775 with its casualty count of 411).
lol
Welcome to 2019 America, where nothing says "expertise" like a YouTube vid from a dumbfuck gamer.
…showing live video of a dumbfuck politician…. you be the expert…
Multiple dumbfuck politicians, if the vid title be believed. I didn't make it all the way through the first one, though I must admit that those responses to "What's a barrel shroud and why should we regulate it?" were pretty goddamn funny.
That’s probably as close as Lamborn will ever get to delivering the next Gettysburg Address . . .
I have no idea. But I have never seen the two of them together at the same time.