U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
January 31, 2020 02:38 PM UTC
21 Comments
Say goodnight Andrew, and do it gracefully. All you're doing is helping Cory Gardner now.
Hickenlooper is the Hillary Clinton of this race. The party favors him over the choice of the base and pushes them out of the way. Then the party favorite goes on to lose.
Man, Nutlid, you're totally giving #coverupcory a big sloppy kiss of death today.
Except …. Hillary Clinton didn't lose in Colorado.
Perhaps you can remember:
If my trusty calculator is right, that is a 136,386 vote (or 4.91%) margin suggesting being the "Hillary Clinton" of the race isn't all negative here in Colorado.
Math is hard for Nutter.
Although one can not ignore that Romanoff doesn't take PAC money, and that the big bad O&G polluters aren't going to belly up to the bar for one who is calling them to account.
Also not surprising when the DSCC put its thumb on the scale and has been encouraging wealthy donors across the country to send money to Hick. I will never again donate to DSCC, DNC or DCCC. During the impeachment hearings, I look at Chuck Shumer and wish the Dems really had a better leader with more dedication to the country and less to his own party power.
They should keep their dirty mitts out of local politics. Let us in Colorado decide!
Have you seen the ads that CRED is running now about what great climate citizens they are? It's stomach crunching to see them.
“Let us in Colorado decide…..” Hate to break it to you, dude. But the far right wing, dark money, PACs that will pump tons of money into Colorado, to prop up Gardner, don’t really care what you think. Nor do the TV stations, and other media, that will rake in the money for all those negative ads.
If you truly want Gardner out, then go with the best way to make it happen. Right now, Romanoff doesn’t appear to have what it takes.
^^this
Hate to break it to you CHB, but Hick created his own negative ads when he was asked, pre-Big thumbed DSCC, if he wanted to run for Senate. Take a look at Hick’s self-assessment for the job – then explain why Gardner won’t be running this on a loop if Hick is his opponent.
And I’m sure hick’s modesty explains why you swing naked from the chandelier while playing “Ride of the Valkyries” on your kazoo and composing the 43 negative-mails a day you send off against him.
Christ on a pogo stick, girl, get a grip on yourself!
As usual, Venezoso, all sexist personal attack, zero political substance. And butting in to a post addressed specifically to CHB.
CHB, did Hick create that ad with his own words, or didn’t he?
The kiwi bird is not only flightless, but logic-less as well.
Well … I think we're far past the "if" stage. It's essentially a coronation at this point.
But yes, here's hoping Hick is into buttplay, because the Gardner campaign will be ramming that up Hick's ass all day, every day until the voting's officially over. Hick won't have a good answer (because there isn't one), but hopefully his campaign team will come up with a passably acceptable answer.
When all you’ve got is just one all-you’ve-got, then . . .
. . . Gardner’s going down his own, personal Udallic campaign rut.
Neither one of these two can honestly run on their record. It’s gonna’ be a long, long well-funded campaign of lies and mudslinging and dark-money/PAC antics . . .
. . . Basically, everything that you’ve come to expect in the way that America does politics, circa 2020 . . .
That term needs to be brought into widespread usage stat.
This is the problem with nominating Romanoff. If he were to be the candidate, the national party would need to divert money away from Iowa, North Carolina, Arizona and Maine to spend in Colorado.
At least Hick doesn't sap resources that need to go to other states.
Wouldn’t include Arizona on that list. Kelly is raking in the dough. Far surpasses McSally (and Hickenlooper for that matter).
Alas…the party will kick in tons of $$$ in Colorado, regardless of who is the nominee.
It should still be a Colorado vote. I don’t care for big party control in Trump’s administration or in the Democrats either. I’m a PCP and volunteer on lots of campaigns…and I like to think that we are the party that cares about the grass roots, about individuals. But when the BIG DOGS who don’t even live in this state or care about our environment to come in controlling things, it makes me doubt my commitment to the Democratic party. It is our state, let Coloradans decide.
I hear ya- and am sympathetic.
But, it's not how it works usually
Anyone who took part in the 2016 caucuses saw what happened.
I walked away from the Dem party establishment because they lost their hearing. They are not listening still. Perhaps they never will.
(HT to Don MacLean)