U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
April 07, 2020 12:47 PM UTC
7 Comments
As the Milwaukee Journal-Sentinel
If Scott Walker wasn't proof enough, Republicans in Wisconsin are extra evil.
Republicans everywhere are scared shitless by mail voting. With good reason from their perspective.
vote by mail > increased turnout > fewer R wins
Measured as it impacts there electability, they aren't wrong to oppose it.
In fact, the same demo opposed women voting and elections for Senators. Measured by subsequent electoral outcomes – they were right.
F'ing Wisconsin.
Wisconsin elects their Supreme Court judges.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_supreme_court
Now- they are not Indiana who attempted to legislate the value of pi to 4 decimals and has periods with more than a dozen time zones.
Wisconsin Supreme Court ruled that the election must go on / the Governor has no power to postpone the election or vary ballot deadlines.
The ruling is published immediately under their banner announcing
Suspending a number of constitutional rights (such as "speedy trial") in order to protect court personnel, but being unwilling to do something similar to protect voting workers. Hmmm…. methinks there may be some political analysis involved in the selection of which Constitutional rights to allow.
WWGD?
Meanwhile, back in D.C., the Trump Court majority isn't even pretending to be anything other than a gaggle of partisan hacks. "The Notorious RBG's dissent is well worth reading" will be an oft-repeated sentence as long as Justice Ginsburg remains alive and in her chambers. Hopefully, some of those dissents will serve as the basis for new law in the distant future.
"Conservative" legal writers are now squawking about how originalism was a useful rhetorical device to achieve an aim, but now that the wingers have control of the judiciary, it's time to come up with new moral underpinnings for jurisprudence in general and constitutional adjudication in particular. "Moral," of course, = pro-white, pro-wealth, pro-corporate, pro-law-'n'-order, anti-gubmint (but only to the extent gubmit is is becoming insufficiently pro-white, etc.).