( – promoted by ClubTwitty)
Earlier today, we released Governor Ritter’s 2007-2010 Conservation Report Card. The Report Card is a quick and readable synopsis of the Governor’s work on conservation issues these last four years. Click here to check it out.
Not many people reading this post will be surprised to learn that Gov. Ritter earns high marks. We gave him an A+ in his trademark issue, the New Energy Economy. He also scored well on Responsible Oil and Gas Development (A), Water (A-), and Global Warming (A-). He does quite well on Mining (B+) and holds his own on Open Spaces and Wild Places (B). The only category were he lagged significantly was Smart Growth and Transportation (C+).
As I say in the letter that opens the Report Card, if the Governor were using these grades as part of an application to college, he would be accepted to a number of excellent schools.
Why issue a Report Card on the Governor’s work as his term winds down? Several reasons.
First, he deserves recognition for all of the work he has done on the critical environmental issues of the day. Colorado is a stunningly beautiful state. We all want to protect our mountains, rivers, open spaces, and clear blue skies. But, we don’t always agree on how best to do that. The Governor had a vision for what our energy mix should look like, how clean our air must be, and how we should protect our air, land, and water from the pressures of energy development. He fought for that vision and was successful more times than not. Colorado is better off for his work.
Second, we wanted to point out where he fell short. It wasn’t often that we disagreed with him or that he failed to move ahead on an important issue. But, there were occasions. History demands a fair accounting.
Finally, the Report Card is a tool to highlight some of what is left to be done. Four years is a small window in time. Whether it is solving our transportation conundrum and the related pressures of growth on our land and water; or carefully planning for our future water needs to ensure we don’t damage important ecological resources; or continuing to make progress on the defining environmental problem of our time, Global Warming, we need to continue to forge ahead. Quickly. We look forward to working with the next administration to do just that.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Delta County’s Rep. Matt Soper Opposes Birthright Citizenship
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: DavidThi808
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: It’s Long Past Time to Ban Body Armor
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Monday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
Now so many more people can enjoy Colorado’s parks and open spaces … because they don’t have jobs to go to.
Even by the low, low standards we have become accustomed to.
http://www.gjsentinel.com/news…
Number #1 reason GJEP gives for locating business in GJ?
CO also ranks 13th (out of 50, for BJ) among states for a favorable business tax climate.
http://www.gjep.org/media/docs…
somewhere recently. 5th I think.
Of course on matters of health and education we rank with MS
If I could just find it … let me lok over here … nope those are stories about Frontier, 1stData, Qwest and Coors HQs leaving … maybe over here, nope more ONG jobs leaving …. Malone and Liberty, nope signally Canada as a likely future residence …. yeah hows that Connoco 7,000 job addition going by the way?
Give me a few hours, I’ll find it.
Here is what some of the O&G execs have recently said about the CO o&g regulations:
http://www.gjsentinel.com/hp/c…
http://coloradoindependent.com…
http://www.gjsentinel.com/news…
In 2009 was listed as 4th. Not too shabby.
🙂
and they have been made without much pain. CO residents will gain for years from his administration’s efforts.
You can’t hit all A’s in politics. Accomplishing what he did, even if not in a recession, would be outstanding.
Overall, energy/environment have been his biggest achievements and will be his long term legacy.
The “new energy economy” sounds hokey but it’s real. It represents a very constructive approach to move away from traditional extraction while balancing economic development with environmental responsibility.
The overall tone of his admin has been to attempt to restore a balance–not to go all enviro as his opponents claim, but to give environmental views a seat at the table and a fair hearing, as opposed to lip service or outright hostility. The re-structuring of the state O&G commission is a case in point. It’s not that O&G are disenfranchised, it’s that other views can be heard–community quality of life, sportsmen, enviros too.
The major shortcomings in my view are (1) the failure to pass the referendum to increase O&G severance tax in 2008–Ritter was politically ineffective to educate/persuade the voters (nothing new there). This $ would have come in handy during the state budget crisis. (2) I specifically disagree with his attempts to undermine the Roadless Rule–he is only muddying the water and gives his successors a chance to drag their feet when the matter is resolved federally.
Put it this way, if the federal govt was as environmentally progressive as Ritter has been, I would be a lot happier right now. And it remains to be seen if Hick will be as good.