President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 05, 2010 10:20 PM UTC

The Face of the "Bad 3"

  • 14 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

That’s about two minutes and forty seconds of “debate” from last month between two proponents of Amendments 60, 61 and Proposition 101, including Gregory Golyansky of recent ignominy–versus opponents Wade Buchanan of the Bell Policy Center, and consultant Katy Atkinson. We don’t know who the other guy is sitting next to Golyansky in the beige sports jacket, but his behavior in this clip makes us think “pre-owned automobiles.”

Now that Golyansky is emerging as a poster-child for these three amendments, this clip is useful to show just how personally unpleasant and combative his demeanor is. It’s not hard to understand why Jane Norton made an issue of Ken Buck’s ties to Golyansky after watching this clip–he’s about the worst spokesman imaginable, except maybe for a Sopranos viral marketing gag.

Comments

14 thoughts on “The Face of the “Bad 3”

    1. Some lawyer working for a firm that does business with the state – and who would know better – writes these fine tax policies as a response to the inability of the Democrat led government to control itself.

      Now the Denver business community is forced to spend $6-10 million dollars to correct the Democrats overreach.

      Way to go Democrats … think of the jobs and investment … and taxes $6-10 million could have generated for Colorado.

      Raising taxes and killing jobs …  

      1. Get serious!  Colorado has one of the lowest tax rates in the nation. Here’s a couple sources for you:

        http://www.e50plus.com/public/

        http://www.census.gov/govs/sta

        So two things wrong with your argument obviously other states, RED states, are taxing people more than “the democrats” in Colorado are.  Second, the business community is spending money because THEY recognize that they could not do business here with the cuts the amendments propose.  

  1. The author was Doug Bruce and while he is a law school graduate and was a prosecutor in California a long time ago, he is not “an attorney” in Colorado, if by that you mean a member of the Bar.  I checked and he is not in the bar, and thus not licensed to practice law in Colorado.  Ergo, he is not an attorney, still less one employed by a law firm that does business with the state.

       

    1. Once they shrink Colorado small enough to drown in a bathtub, there’ll be no licensing of attorneys or guns or anything else.  Mr Bruce is an attorney in the eyes of god — or something like that . . .

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

76 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!