“The hardest metal yields to sufficient heat.”
–Mohandas Gandhi
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: kwtree
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Delta County’s Rep. Matt Soper Opposes Birthright Citizenship
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: NotHopeful
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
http://www.gjsentinel.com/news…
Meis never saw a drilling pond he didn’t like and Brophy knows as much about Natural Resources as my black lab.
Doesn’t your lab pee all over our natural resources 🙂
It looks like the tree waster Singleton has now gone completely in to the swamp. CD7 has one of the best Representatives in Congress. Ed represents us, not corporate special interests, not teabaggers and especially not those ready and willing to sell America to China.
Why would Singleton not endorse Perlmutter for reelection? Simple. Ed represents Dems, working people, veterans, and that other group Singleton hates with a frothing passion – Labor. Dare to support Labor and working families Dean will do everything in his power to destroy you.
I support Ed Perlmutter because he is a good representative for me and you. He does not live on the wrong side of ethical behavior, he is a someone to vote for for standing up and voting for America, not China.
Perhaps Singleton does not think being a lap dog for the Obama/Pelosi economic agenda was in the best interest of the district. Perlmuter may be a wonderful guy. His voting record sucks.
Has there been an endorsement by Singleton in CD7?
Frazier is the best choice for this split Metro Denver district. Bring balance to Washington is critical.
Markey and Perlmutter have been complete toadies for Pelois-Obama agenda. I think the Post sees Ed and Betsy as having helped move forward the job killing government-centric policies without regard to the benefit for America as a nation.
http://www.denverpost.com/opin…
I suspect the Post is also so anti Union that it is trying to withhold a Bennet endorsement until he commits to voting no on card check … otherwise he fits their mold of bought and paid for legislator willing to crank up taxes wherever so that favored expenditures can be handed out.
My guess is they end up endoring Buck and Bennet continues to waffle on card check because he is afraid of upsetting the unions.
Bennet has been a rock solid YES-man for the overreach Obama-Pelosi agenda. Bennet’s backed cap-and-trade that will drive up consumer energy costs and consumer prices.
He’s bet his election on his Obamacare votes, these actions have not only closed healthcare choice, but have driven costs higher.
Bennet’s looking for a compromise on the “card check” bill.
Worse he’s backed the wasteful $1 trillion stimulus, crushed banks and consumers with new regulations and now wonders in his ads “what do we have to show for it?”
Has there been an endorsement by Singleton in CD7?
Let me remind you, I have been prohibited by my ophthalmologist from head butting…..so I will not reply to this thread….although it is real hard to keep from banging my head against the wall.
from The Atlantic
Keep in mind that an SS division (distinct from the Army) on the Eastern Front was the Nazis at their worst. They did not take prisoners. They murdered civilians wholesale and left the rest to starve after taking all their food.
And this is who he chooses to reenact…
That would be the Einsatzgruppen. But nearly every German, regardless of whether he was regular army, SS, or Gestapo was a war criminal on the Eastern Front. (The 5th SS Panzer Division Wiking participated in the rounding up of Jews for the Einsatzgruppen, and Dr. Josef Mengele served with that division early on in the war, albeit in a strict care-giving capacity.)
Yeah, having any voluntary association with such a group is sickening.
Don’t Nazi fanboys deserve representation? Wouldn’t having one serving in Ohio’s delegation “bring balance to Washington?” Genocidal maniacs need represenatation too.
from HuffPo
How on earth are we better off with fewer teachers and more crowded classrooms? Especially when the layoffs are done based on seniority and so we’ve dumped all the new teachers we will need as the existing ones retire.
“I don’t want to abolish government. I simply want to reduce it to the size where I can drag it into the bathroom and drown it in the bathtub.” – Grover Norquist
the republicans Wish to dismantle the United states government from within.
Whilst unfairly projecting that goal upon Democrats.
their tac is twofold.
never mind the obvious obstructionist tactics of the tea bag republicans. those tactics are meant to deny President Obama ANY credit for returning America to Greatness. Whilst at the same time reducing America to a third world country. once that goal is achieved (along with laying the blame on Democrats) then the republicans are free to remake America into the hell Their ideology leads to.
FDIC Ready To Sue Executives From Failed Banks
Last week Brown and/or his other senior campaign folk are taped referring to his opponent, Whitman, as a whore. Later the same week NOW comes out and endorses Brown.
Why would any Republican woman support a group like NOW?
I’m aware of Brown’s stupid remarks, but I also know he’s long been a proponent of women’s issues. Is a private but recorded and disseminated remark enough to erase that record? No.
Unless Whitman has a similar record (and IIRC this is her first run for office) then there’s no reason for NOW to endorse Whitman.
to make medical and moral decisions for them or their daughters. In truth I was never a member of NOW but as hard as it is for you to believe there are/were Republican women for choice. I was one of them.
My guess is about 1/2 the people in the Republican party are pro-choice. I am. I don’t wear it on my sleave and I don’t think there is any real risk to Rowe v Wade rights so I don’t see it as a current issue for me.
I think groups like NOW lose all credibility when they hear a candidate disparage women and turn around and support them as if that was of no importance. Women’s rights and reproductive rights are not identical.
Master of the false assumption.
How is calling one woman a whore disparaging women in general?
p.s. re:
I agree with your first three words.
1) Referring to a woman in that manner evidences an attitude which is inconsistent with treating women with respect.
2) The Supreme Court has this concept called Stare Decisis (sp?) which essentially treats prior decisions with deference. The essence of the case, that during the first trimester an abortion is permitted, is to me clearly established Constituional law and not likely to change.
To radicals with an agenda, the castle is always under imminent seige. That is how they raise money and what gives them their overblown sense of self-importance.
referring to women as whores. Many men are whores, as well, both figuratively and literally. Present company excepted, of course.
Great argument.
Let me see:
Referring to someone as a “N word” in politics is not the same as referring to blacks as “N word”.
Referring to someone as a “fill in the blank for your favorite ethnic group to trash and the slur associated with them” in politics is not the same as referring to “your favorite trashed ethnic group” as “your favorite trashed ethnic group slur”
Perhaps we can aim a little higher for our political leaders?
Do tell us how being sensitive to the 9/11 families discomfort with an Islamic cultural center in the WTC neighborhood doesn’t support the bigoted notion that ALL Muslims are terrorists?
You can defend the delicate sensibilities of blacks and women but not Muslims, eh?
There’s only one candidate who campaigned on an explicitly sexist message, and H-man is his prophet.
Buck campaigned on that message?
That means it’s part of the campaign.
OH NO PLEASE DON’T REMEMBER BUCK’S WORDS!
No media report suggests it was Brown who said this, making your “and/or” statement typical Repugnicon dishonesty. How do you sleep at night? Oh I know, because defending the honor of women everywhere allows you to feel better for your lying.
Whitman purportedly promised a pension protection deal in return for an endorsement. Selling one’s honor to the highest bidder is what whores do, no?
As for Stare Decisis, did you hear about Citizens United? This SCOTUS has no interest in precedent that does not agree with its agenda, and the center vote on this 5-4 pro-choice court is Anthony Kennedy, whose opinion in Gonzales v. Carhartt was dripping with paternalism justifying Congress outlawing what a woman’s doctor might feel was the safest medical procedure for her, because she might regret it later.
When you refer to “radicals with an agenda”, do you mean the notion that a woman might be able to obtain an abortion in her community with a minimum of state interference? Because that “radical agenda” is under constant threat by state laws. Whether Roe survives or not, laws which forbid insurance carriers from providing liability coverage to abortion providers, or reporting requirements which mandate posting such detailed demographic information to public websites that make it obvious who the patient is even if their name is redacted, continually press the limits of what constitutes an undue burden on her rights.
Should military women abroad have the same right to legal abortion as their stateside counterparts? What should abortion coverage look like under Healthcare Reform? These are issues that have nothing to do with Roe, but are central to the rights you pay lip service to.
According to you, Roe is safe, so these are just fundraising ploys. Do you believe half the crap you write?
The media report I heard indicated it was unclear whether it was Brown or his staff which is why I wrote it that way. I heard it on Fox. I am sure Brown can clear that up by identifying who said it. And thanks for asking, I got a good night’s sleep last night.
I have heard about Citiens United which as I understand affords first amendment protection for political speech of corporate entities. Are you another one of those left wing whack jobs that think the first amendment should only protect union speech? Frankly, I think our first amendment rights are very important and that all citizens should enjoy them. I am sorry you do not.
Well, that’s your problem right there. Was it an actual newscast, or was it one of the talking head shows?
Has the Brown campaign identified the individual who referred to Whitman as a whore?
Or do they not want to do so because then they would be under pressure to fire them, if it was not Brown?
So anything that you’re thinking in response to what they reported is the wrong thing to think. Like these questions you’re asking.
Citizens United demonstrates the SCOTUS to reverse precedent at will, and answer questions which were not asked in the appeal.
but that doesn’t mean that abortion’s foes aren’t trying every single trick to effectively if not actually ban the practice.
It may not be an important issue to you, but it is to NOW, and Brown has the long record to prove it. This incident doesn’t erase that.
Now, can we please get back to Colorado politics?
but I don’t think it was Brown who made the statement. If I understand the news broadcast I heard it was some of his people. Frankly I don’t think this type of thing from either party candidate or his/her people has any place in intelligent debate but then I’m one of those throwbacks to a different age.
I am sure they could clear it up by identifying the person’s voice, but I suspect they may not.
doesn’t mean it’s unclear.
It is made by one of his polical types in a discussion about getting an endorsement from a union they aro both apparantly trying to get.
http://www.realclearpolitics.c…
H-Man has no substantive response because he’s too busy gargling w/ Ken Buck’s balls.
If not, let me be the first to complement you on the classy posts you make.
I am sure because they are directed at me that ColoradoPols thinks they are just fine.
to you being a disgusting jerk all the time.
http://www.google.com/hostedne…
The ‘aid’ deserves a smackdown but it was not Brown personally who made the offensive comment, like you insinuate.
It sure sounded like Brown.
is a disgrace to women.
But none of the rest of us are being picky about it.
No comments since October 1. I miss him.
I know Jams was yesterday, but today is John Lennon’s 70th birthday. Every copy of “Imagine” has embedding disabled. So I’ll post this and dedicate it to… (Well, you all know who you are.)
Perlmutter expanding his lead
Markey falling further behind
Salazar making it a very close race
Markey and Bennet are done.
Salazar is very close, one of the 5-10 seats right now that could go either way. Both national parties are now throwing money at that race
I expect some action in CD-7 by the time it is all said and done. I think that will be the nail biter. The DP endorsement of Frazier will help him and I think he is the sleeper candidate this cycle. Right now, 538 does not see CD-7 that way.
except when they predict a Democratic victory somewhere. Then they have no clue what they’re talking about. Gotcha.
They have the Senate at about 48-52 or 49-51, the Republicans taking the house and Bennet, Markey and Salazar losing.
What’s that?
A “victory” is when a candidate gets more votes than any other candidate in the same race.
This lesson has been brought to you by the letter D and the number 365.
Henhouse meet fox–well, perhaps that’s unfair to foxes.
And I do mean FORTUNATELY, it’s not going to happen.
One more reason to vote against Tancredo.
is sounding hysterical, too!
No? Then what do you bring to the party?
Right.
From SNL. Sorry about the real commercial on the front end.
You did provide a link and I just missed it. It was Saturday and so I read my home delivered copy and did not see it.
You scooped.
It’s Taiwan’s 4th of July equivalent today!