U.S. Senate
See Full Big Line
(D) J. Hickenlooper*
(R) Somebody
80%
20%
Governor
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse
(D) Phil Weiser
(D) Jena Griswold
60%
60%
40%↓
Att. General
See Full Big Line
(D) M. Dougherty
(D) Alexis King
(D) Brian Mason
40%
40%
30%
Sec. of State
See Full Big Line
(D) George Stern
(D) A. Gonzalez
(R) Sheri Davis
40%
40%
30%
State Treasurer
See Full Big Line
(D) Brianna Titone
(R) Kevin Grantham
(D) Jerry DiTullio
60%
30%
20%
CO-01 (Denver)
See Full Big Line
(D) Diana DeGette*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-02 (Boulder-ish)
See Full Big Line
(D) Joe Neguse*
(R) Somebody
90%
2%
CO-03 (West & Southern CO)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Hurd*
(D) Somebody
80%
40%
CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado)
See Full Big Line
(R) Lauren Boebert*
(D) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-05 (Colorado Springs)
See Full Big Line
(R) Jeff Crank*
(D) Somebody
80%
20%
CO-06 (Aurora)
See Full Big Line
(D) Jason Crow*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-07 (Jefferson County)
See Full Big Line
(D) B. Pettersen*
(R) Somebody
90%
10%
CO-08 (Northern Colo.)
See Full Big Line
(R) Gabe Evans*
(D) Yadira Caraveo
(D) Joe Salazar
50%
40%
40%
State Senate Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
80%
20%
State House Majority
See Full Big Line
DEMOCRATS
REPUBLICANS
95%
5%
October 13, 2010 11:03 PM UTC
14 Comments
Good riddance.
the man has a permanently broken dimmer switch to the brain.
He is Dim Bulb no matter what the voltage.
…and people actually VOTE for these idiots?
I’m already a little bit nostalgic about the World According To Dave – perhaps the only thing Dave really feared was reality.
But, on the bright side, may Tancredo will get elected and we can see Dave head up some cabinet agency and we will not be deprived of his keen understanding of society, people and the values that made the Republican Party what it is today.
Sen. Schultheis knows how to use a blog?
After all, both oversaw the largest increase in government spending and power in the history of their countries.
The first paragraph which is just a run on sentence?
The government agencies that “preform” operations?
Or the three different governments – county, city, and municipal? He left out the federal and the national governments.
Or playing a daring game of “I can’t see you, so you can’t see me!”
Keep those peepers shut, Dave! We’re pulling for you… to give back all that “waste” you’ve been paid for doing diddlyshit. I hate government, so put me in charge has been done to death.
“Douchenozzle” on this blog?
If used as a verb there could be scary consequences.
Sure.
That’s who I meant.
Anyone who’s the least bit responsible knows that 60, 61 and 101 would be devastating to Colorado’s economy. That includes tons and tons of sane, rational Republicans.
Meanwhile, Shultheis and Tancredo once again demonstrate that they are absolutely irresponsible.
Speaking strictly for Prop. 101, I for one am for its passage (pause for boos and hisses). Why you ask? Well for one thing, I am a farmer that relies yearly on several vehicles that enable me to produce crops and livestock that enter the commercial market stream that we all shop from. Licensing and registering these vehicles so they remain legal on Colorado roads took a big jump under Gov. Ritter). Nowhere did they make any exclusions for farmers…they simply increased the registration fees and said “deal with it”. Well, many farmers did deal with it by increasing the price of their products to market and consumers dealt with it by paying the higher prices and complaining of the increase in cost of these products.
My point is this…the majority of the people saying vote no on 101 are likely to live in the city where their roads are paved and they don’t need anymore than a car or two for their family. Not all of Colorado is paved. The majority of the registration and licensing fees are “supposed to” have gone to maintaining the roads (a big joke on us farmers eh? – we’ll never see it in our quest to put beef, pork or corn on YOUR table!)
101 is by no means a perfect answer but will temporarily give some of us relief and maybe, just maybe, ease our production costs somewhat. Whoever reads and writes these propositions and bills needs to really take EVERYTHING into account…not just one district in which they reside or one or two demographics in their community. Pass this proposition and then create the next proposition that is fairer to EVERYONE instead of some or very few. The way the vehicle registration is now, pretty much every Coloradoan is paying the same amount whether they live in Holly, Campo, Eads, Denver, Grand Junction or Vail. We are not all benefiting equally from the INTENDED use!!!