U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line
(D) A. Gonzalez

(D) George Stern

(R) Sheri Davis

50%↑

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
October 13, 2010 11:08 PM UTC

Ken Buck: No Science Foundation, No Public Disease Research

  • 9 Comments
  • by: nancycronk

Supporters of Ken Buck love to say he is the moderate choice for the US Senate from Colorado. They have tried to distance themselves from the Tea Party, and quote him as “softening” on all kinds of issues. Progressives have another name for it — “Buckpedaling”.

But is Buck a moderate? According to the Washington Monthly, Buck believes the National Science Foundation and the Center for Disease Control is part of the nanny-state problem, as well.

The article points to a March interview with Aaron Harbor, where Buck says this:

During a March appearance on the Aaron Harber TV show, which airs on Denver PBS station KBDI, Buck discussed how wasteful and inefficient the federal government is and said, “I don’t believe that the federal government runs anything more efficiently than the private sector. […]

Harber then asked about privatizing the National Science Foundation. Buck replied it would be better to have industry work with the science foundation rather than have the government run it alone.

“How about the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention?” Harber asked.

“Absolutely, again, partnering with private foundations, private hospitals, states and local governments, far more efficient than … having the federal government run something…. I’m not suggesting that people shouldn’t get health care or that we shouldn’t have a function in our country like CDC. What I’m suggesting is that … folks that are in control of that program, if they’re in the federal government, are going to be a lot less efficient than if they’re in the private sector.”

Where does Ken Buck draw the line (here is where H-man and others will accuse me of hyperbole):

Police and Fire Protection: Why should we pay when someone else’s family member is murdered, or their house is on fire?

Public services? Shouldn’t we all build our own roads, hospitals and schools?

Water? Isn’t cleaning water and piping it into our homes also part of the “nanny state”?

Air: Isn’t that socialized, too, because we share it?

Clearly, the Republican extremist capitalist view of having everything privatized has reached the level of the absurd. Yet, Ken Buck’s quotes calling for these extreme positions are easy to find.

Buck supporters will accuse progressives of dragging up old quotes and using them opportunistically three weeks before the election. Progressives are justified in doing so; if Ken Buck and supporters won’t tell the truth about Ken Buck’s extremist ways, who will?  

Comments

9 thoughts on “Ken Buck: No Science Foundation, No Public Disease Research

  1. He suggested a federal/industry partnership for the NSF, not that the functions not be performed. For the CDC he suggested a partnership with foundations and state governments, not that the function performed by the CDC not be performed.  I see no problem with any of this.  

    One of the functions you suggest is fire protection.  In fact many voluteer fire departments accross the country are that type of partnership.  

  2. Nobody hates the private sector as much as Dems want to believe. Although you should title your diaries accurately. Typical lies from the Bennet campaign.

  3. When the police get 911 calls, they can put their services out for competetive bid.  

    Rapist broke into your house?  What’ll you pay us to show up?  By the way, we’ve got a guy on the other line with an intruder in his garage.  He’s worried about his golf clubs and will pay us $2000 to show up asap.  You’re going to have to offer $2100 to stay in the game.  What’s that?  You’re a 25 year old school teacher and don’t have $2100?  We’ll gladly take a credit card.  No?  Hmmm, sorry. Better luck next time.

    (Hint:  the more you pay, the faster we’ll get there!)

  4. Socialism requires centralized government.  The trains in Nazi Germany ran on time.  I would prefer not to live in a place like that, but maybe that is just me.  The Soviet Union had centralized control over all aspects of the economy.  The economy evolved into a fraud and the country collapsed.

    Many have concluded that the last two years of Democrat single party rule have given us a window into how, if unchecked, the “efficiency” of centralized government in the US might evolve.  I think there will be a large number of people whose view of the world are more alligned with Washington and Jefferson who show up to vote and a much smaller number of people whose world view is shaped by the efficiency of socialism.

    Science seems to be well served in both settings. The scientific accomplishements of Nazi Germany and the Soviet Union were certainly impressive.  I cherish my freedom more than I care for the increased efficiency that socialism promises, but historically has not delivered.

  5. Nancy, you are using a slippery slope argument that holds no water.  As H-Man correctly pointed out Buck is not calling for the end of the services and functions of these government run entities but for a partnership where the executive direction is controlled by the private sector.

    That point of view is by no means a suggestion that you build your own road into your neighborhood and you know it.  Just because you’re offering to write checks to people for making phone calls doesn’t mean you have to be a mindless mouthpiece for the Bennet campaign.  Use your brain and stick with logical argument and your means would be better served.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Gabe Evans
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

106 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!