U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
June 09, 2020 09:07 AM UTC

Colorado Leads on Mail Ballots (Without Cory Gardner)

  • 10 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols
Donald Trump, Cory Gardner.

Colorado Public Radio’s Caitlyn Kim reports today on the push from Democratic members of Congress from Colorado and Secretary of State Jena Griswold to encourage other states to adopt our state’s highly successful–and much safer from a social distancing perspective–mail ballot election system:

“If we do not act as a nation very quickly, Americans who are Republicans, Democrats, and Independents will all be faced with the question: ‘Do I go into a crowded polling location and risk my health, or do I sit home and not vote?’” said Colorado Secretary of State Jena Griswold, who has been talking up the Colorado model of all-mail voting in recent months.

Moving to all-mail voting takes money, for everything from new machinery to postage. Congress did earmark $400 million in the CARES Act to help with the 2020 elections, money states could use for these efforts. But the Election Assistance Commission, which distributes the funds, said states only get the money they put up a match 20 percent out of their own budgets. It’s a tough ask when many states are looking to slash spending this year amid the coronavirus-related recession.

Democratic Rep. Joe Neguse of Boulder has introduced legislation to get rid of the match requirement. He said it’s a vestige from an earlier election funding bill and not something Congress ever intended to include in the CARES Act.

It’s important to start with a reminder that nothing being proposed at the federal level by Colorado lawmakers or anyone else that we know of would mandate the use of mail ballots in states that don’t want to adopt the system. Rep. Joe Neguse’s legislation, accompanied in the Senate with a bill from Colorado’s senior Sen. Michael Bennet, and GOP Sen. Susan Collins of Maine, is about providing funding for mail ballots for states that want to make the switch.

There is a problem, of course. President Donald Trump, facing a significant possibility of being defeated in the November election, has seized on mail ballots as a way to preemptively undermine legitimacy of the election in the event he loses–despite an absence of any evidence that mail ballots result in a higher rate of either error or mischief than any other method.

The night-and-day difference between Trump’s alarm over mail ballots and Colorado’s uncontroversial success implementing them is putting local Republicans in a very difficult position. Sen. Cory Gardner, who won his seat in 2014 in the first general election test of Colorado’s new mail ballot system, knows perfectly well that mail ballots work.

But as one of Trump’s closest allies, he’s not able–or willing–to say so:

Colorado Sen. Cory Gardner, a couple of weeks after the passage of the CARES Act, said that it should be a state decision.

“Washington, D.C. should not run the state’s elections,” he told Politico. “If a state determines that’s the way it wants to go, a state should make that decision.”

Well folks, that’s exactly what Colorado Democrats are proposing! This is not about forcing mail ballots on states that don’t want them. It’s about exporting Colorado’s success to states that do–and if that doesn’t ring like a line from a Gardner re-election commercial, what does?

Don’t hold your breath of course. As long as Trump needs this allegation in his back pocket for November, we expect Gardner will stay muzzled on the matter of mail ballots. And we all hope, though for very different reasons, that the margin in November will be big enough to render these questions moot.

Comments

10 thoughts on “Colorado Leads on Mail Ballots (Without Cory Gardner)

  1. I have a black friend in Atlanta who stood in line this morning for 3.5 hours in Dekalb County (Atlanta, where he's voted over the past decade) and when it was his turn he was informed that he was registered in Fulton County now. 

    This is not an accident, nor is it incompetence; this is voter suppression. Oddly the majority-white counties are having no issues.

    In Georgia, primary day snarled by long lines, problems with voting machines — a potential preview of November

    Problems were concentrated in Atlanta and surrounding counties, where voters described arriving before polls opened and standing in line for hours, with election officials processing ballots painfully slowly because they couldn’t get new touch-screen machines to work or they had not been delivered in time.

     

    1. I’m not a big fan of Stacey Abrams, for my own reasons. I also believe that the Georgia gubernatorial election in 2018 was stolen from her by the winner, who just happened to be the GA secretary of state at the time, and in charge of the election.

      The US Constitution, and over 200 years of constitutional case law, says one person, one vote. Not sure why some have a problem with this. It seems pretty clear to this constitutional conservative.

      p.s. your link is behind the Washington Post’s pay wall. I already subscribe to the Denver Post and parts of the NY Times.

      1. Yesterday one of my hysterical Dumphuckistan friends commented that 'the blacks' were trying to overturn our constitutional government.  My reply was 'the blacks' are simply trying to get our constitutional government to live by its preamble. 

  2. I hope this is a mistake we'll actually learn from and never, ever repeat:

    Trump is flailing like an overturned turtle. A historic health crisis, an economic crisis and a social crisis all at once — it’s far too much for a reality TV star to handle, no more manageable than it’d be for him to land an airplane. What this moment may have revealed, ironically enough, is that only in a time of stability and outrageous decadence could the United States have had the luxury of picking such a dark and divisive candidate with the intellectual firepower of a water gun. When Trump asked voters “What have you got to lose?” most never dreamed that the answer could be: Everything.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

173 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!