October 15, 2010 10:00 PM UTC

Pols and Independent Ignoring Rape Survivor?

•  
• by: No2Dems

Well it would seem that the only way your opinion matters to Colorado Pols and the Colorado Independent is if you are a “Buck hater”.  Which proves that they are nothing more than smear merchants peddling left wing propaganda.  Just like the rest of the people that have hijacked the Democratic party they are nothing more than ideologues.

Yesterday, a courageous, and strong sex assault survivor came forward to speak out against the unfair and misleading statements regarding Buck by the Bennet campaign and his supporters.  

http://blogs.denverpost.com/th…

In the story she proudly voices her strong supportive opinion of Buck as both a sex assault survivor and a woman.  She provides a description of a completely different experience than that of the other unnamed woman.  

However, we are told by Colorado Pols and the Colorado Independent to just ignore Ms. Corban’s opinion.  That it is an “apple to orange” comparison.  

Does the opinion of this woman described in these articles not matter?

http://fightforjustice.blogspo…

www.greeleytribune.com/article/20070909/…/109080140

www.greeleytribune.com/article/20070906/…/109050132

Where is the sensitivity from Pols and the Independent to this sex assault survivor?  Does their empathy only apply to persons who share in their ideololgy and common hate for a good man?

The Pols and Independent anti-Buck opinion pieces started off as “why did Buck not prosecute?”, but have quickly changed to statements by Buck to the unnamed alleged victim.  Ms. Corban states she was told similar warnings by Buck, but took them completely different then the unnamed alleged victim.  I am sure that Ms. Corban fully understood the pressure of a district attorney to present a strong case and was only doing his job.  But once again we are told to ignore Ms. Corban’s statements because they do not fit the attempt to frame Buck as something he is not.

The Pols and Independent opinion also have not highlighted other facts contained in the Post article, which relate to Buck’s strong advocacy for sex assault survivors.  Are we to ignore that Buck has created and participated in numerous programs that advocate for sex assault survivors? I understand that he doesn’t really deserve credit for doing his job here, but the left portrays him in a completely different light as a woman hater and pro-rapist so it bears mentioning.  

This whole game of “pay attention to this but not to this” played by the staff of Pols and the Independent reek of desperation.  Who are they to say what opinion matters to people and what opinion does not matter.

My question is why don’t the opinions of both the women be heard equally?  Why are we to ignore the pro-Buck opinion? Is it solely just because it does not fit the deranged view of the staff and other Democrats that they have tried so hard and desperately to portray Buck as something he just isn’t?  I think that it has been strongly argued that it is.