As announced by 9NEWS’ Marshall Zelinger a short while ago this evening, a new poll of the Colorado Democratic U.S. Senate primary slams home just days before voting ends the overwhelming advantage enjoyed by former Gov John Hickenlooper in this race:
More poll details can be found here.
A thirty-point advantage for Hickenlooper in this poll underscores a simple fact: all of the recent hullaballoo over Hickenlooper’s stumbles is still not enough to overcome eight years of beneficial experience as the popular though quirky and unpolished Democratic governor of Colorado, and years before that as Denver’s equally personable brewer-mayor. Every attempt to take Hickenlooper down politically immediately runs into an enduring positive impression he left with the voters of Colorado after leaving office.
The numbers in this poll explain very clearly why Democrats focused in defeating incumbent GOP Sen. Cory Gardner have stuck with Hickenlooper around the rough edges: 67% say that Hickenlooper has the better chance of beating Gardner than Andrew Romanoff, and 62% say Hickenlooper is “an ethical guy who made some mistakes”–a clear indicator that the recently concluded ethics proceeding that resulted in some minor findings of fault for travel expenses did not do lasting damage to Hick’s reputation.
From the moment Hickenlooper entered the U.S. Senate race last summer, the result anticipated in this poll was the most likely outcome. Hickenlooper is the only contender in the primary who ever demonstrated the organizing and fundraising capacity for a contested U.S. Senate race. In an election with enormous importance for Democrats and a growing chance to actually retake the Senate, any advantage in one race that allows Democrats to allocate resources into another is crucial to the larger strategy.
This poll tells us that Colorado Democratic primary voters get it.
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: harrydoby
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: kwtree
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Christmas 2024 Open Thread
BY: Conserv. Head Banger
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Delta County’s Rep. Matt Soper Opposes Birthright Citizenship
BY: Pam Bennett
IN: Colorado Pols is 20 Years Old!!!
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
But, Hick is not pure enough.
Smiling Cory will use Hick’s support of oil & gas against him.
Hick is surging! And he is doing it without promising free stuff to everyone and his brother.
Amazing how two apparently intelligent people can come up with, in the same thread, the two dumbest comments of the day. "Purity" and "free stuff"…really?
…and yet there are media buys by the DSC and a dark money group to carpet bomb Andrew between now and Tuesday (reportedly into seven figures). If your internals are telling you you’re ahead 2-1 this makes no sense.
It is a waste of money. Haven't most people already voted?
Let's face it, Hick was mocked for telling the public that he was not a socialist back when he was in the presidential debate.
Andrew used to be a centrist/corporatist/DLC type but has come to the conclusion that his future is brightest by promising free stuff (MFA-whether-they-want-it-or-not, free college, etc., etc.).
This is a referendum on whether Colorado Dems and UAFs want candidates who are promising free stuff for all. So far, it doesn't look good for the democratic socialists here.
Hick missed a grand opportunity (like he did with ending Prohibition) to educate the masses on the difference between socialism and Democratic socialism (the program that made rural America great in its day).
Let’s face it, if Hick isn’t on board with a whole lot of needed 1930’s depression-era “socialism” right now, he’s only marginally better than Coreless.
I don’t think that’s the case, but Hick (like you, apparently) has a long history of far, far too often being too much concerned about certain labels, or running scared to avoid being labeled, than acting and taking action.
It ain’t now, and never was, a referendum on “free stuff,” that’s just more tedious and tiresome trolling. It’s a referendum on who folks believe has the best positioning, support, and chance of beating Gardner.
pardon some repetition…editing by a distracted simpleton.
That's a wonderful timely speech, Duke…Very prescient of Mr. Truman.
In other news, making Washington, DC, the 51st state is currently being debated in the House. Having Trump deploy private militia into the streets to brutalize peaceful protesters was an eye-opener for many.
Since it won't get through McConnell's Senate, it will probably come up in the next session. Way overdue, in my opinion. Puerto Rico should be next.
The Triad has a great piece today on 'old guard Republicans'
Thanks for clarifying that, Michael. When I saw the term "Triad," first thing coming to mind was the Chinese triads (gangsters) of Hong Kong and Macau.
Ancillary details from the SurveyUSA site:
Get your earplugs. When kwtree sees this post get ready for a very long, bitter, Ride of the Valkyries! She just can't help herself. Neither can Duke, but at least his jabs are short.
This one looks like a reliable poll, unlike most of the polls commissioned by Hick’s staff or funders, which have breathlessly hyped 60 point margins.
It does look as if unaffiliated voters are breaking more for Hick than Romanoff; however, they were under-represented in the sampled population. (Only 20% of respondents were UAF, while that number is closer to 40% of actual registered voters in CO).
But the only poll that matters will be revealed on June 30 sometime before midnight, when ballots are counted.
Drop those ballots in the box, folks!
"Drop those ballots in the box, folks!"
I did, yesterday.
Unafiliated voters aren't underrepresented. This is a Democratic primary and they can vote R or not at all.
Let's face it, Hick is basically a douchebag, but much less so than Gardner. And voting is frequently a binary choice of the lesser of two evils (or douchebags). So I'll vote for Hick, assuming he gets the nomination, but I'm not going to do it with glee.
Sorry, dude. But you sound like a poor little cupcake progressive who didn't get his way.
Littwin: Poll showing Hick beating Romanoff is not the one Gardner should be worried about
From the Colorado Sun Opinion Newsletter (can't link, only quote)
Yeah. Everybody knows how objective “internal polls” are — and still your boy is whupped by 12 points.
SQUIRREL!Hickenlooper!Tee hee.