“O Lord, help me to be pure, but not yet.”
–Saint Augustine
You must be logged in to post a comment.
BY: JohnNorthofDenver
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: Duke Cox
IN: Dems Save The Day, Government To Stay Open
BY: Gilpin Guy
IN: Weld County Gerrymandering Case Pushes The Boundaries Of Home Rule
BY: SSG_Dan
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: notaskinnycook
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: bullshit!
IN: Friday Jams Fest
BY: 2Jung2Die
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
BY: JohnInDenver
IN: Friday Open Thread
Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!
I beat Libby! Oops, he can’t post. Oh well.
as well as the complaints from sock puppets never heard from before
Why is it we can’t link or quote the Denver daily but they can link CPols/RBI poll on Senate race in today’s on-line edition?
Because they can afford lawyers.
I can’t think of one good reason that D’s and R’s of all stripes aren’t objecting. The other paper depends on it’s subscribers more than their lawyers – or do they?
Only number that’s less is their advertisers.
in response to Alicia Caldwell’s post on The Spot (where the Post originally cited the Pols poll) here: http://blogs.denverpost.com/th…
(I think I can post that link without being sent to the PB; the rules still aren’t clear to me.)
Of course, none of my comments have actually been posted, because the major Denver newspaper would rather not have its hypocrisy exposed. Still, Ellie, I think we’re all together on this one.
Asking polsters not to quote the Post and the other papers is fine, and I understand not promoting diaries with links, but asking us NOT TO EVEN LINK to those papers and discuss their articles in comments is going too far. If your lawyers are telling you that you’re exposing yourself to a lawsuit based on that, it’s time to find a better legal team.
Here’s a list of 10 of them, from tinyurl on down.
That way we can still get to content but we don’t send rankings to the Ghost.
I’ll do that from now on.
Democrats: ‘If We’re Gonna Lose, Let’s Go Down Running Away From Every Legislative Accomplishment We’ve Made’
WASHINGTON-Conceding almost certain Republican gains in next month’s crucial midterm elections, Democratic lawmakers vowed Tuesday not to give up without making one final push to ensure their party runs away from every major legislative victory of the past two years.
Party leaders told reporters that regardless of the ultimate outcome, they would do everything in their power from now until the polls closed to distance themselves from their hard-won passage of a historic health care overhaul, the toughest financial regulations since the 1930s, and a stimulus package most economists now credit with preventing a second Great Depression.
“There’s a great deal on the line, and we know it isn’t going to be easy for us,” said Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-NV), speaking from the steps of the Capitol. “But if we suffer defeat, we will do so knowing we cowered away from absolutely anything we produced that was even remotely progressive or valuable in any way.”
“And we will keep cowering right up until Election Day,” Reid continued. “From Maine to Hawaii, in big cities and small towns, we will collapse into a fetal position and refuse to take credit for our successes anywhere voters could conceivably be swayed by learning what we have achieved on their behalf.”
http://www.theonion.com/articl…
Not sure if that made sense, but you probably got the drift.
It’s like that list of some thirty thing Obama did for the LGBT community but some in the latter insist it’s not enough.
Circular firing squad, indeed.
begot the likes of Daily Show, Colbert, & Onion.
Been rereading some old work by Doug Kenney, PJ O’Rourke, & others concerning Nixon’s fear-baiting machinations.
’70’s GOP scarily reminiscent of our recent past.
“
Brought to mind because the author, Ted Sorenson, suffered a stroke, his second, the other day.
While we fervently wish for his recovery, let us also keep the dream alive. No quitter ever won, no winner ever quit, no matter how long it takes. Two years is a blink of an eye.
In the spirit of Fidel posting perhaps the greatest video clip ever yesterday, here’s a completely non-political freaky clip from an Irish filmmaker who’s just proven that time travel exists. He found something seriously freaky and interesting in an old Charlie Chaplin movie.
Pols, don’t bother putting me in the box, because I’ll just go back in time and change my screen name.
and you don’t have a long and lengthy record of thread- and diary-hijacking. I wouldn’t sweat it. (And I’m sure you’re being facetious, but it’s worth saying for those who might miss that.)
And that guy takes longer to get to the point than BJ.
I’d give more cred to Zemeckis and what he foresaw 25 yrs. ago in Back to the Future
…..and whether the cell phone towers also traveled back in time, along with the wireless service providers LOL! 😉
Give me wodka swilling Russian airbag testers any day!
…wodka is the Polish variation of vodka, not the Russian one, right?
I am really happy you liked yesterdays video. I think our sense of humor is pretty damn similar. I watched that thing about 10 times.
Hope you survive all the election hoopla – we’ll all still be here come Nov 3.
twas too good not to share.
The last video that made me laugh that hard was the cat that got stuck to the ceiling fan. I’m as ashamed of myself now as I was then.
Soooo … it’s more parsimonious to postulate that there is a cell phone rather than a portable AM/FM radio in this movie because … it’s 1928 don’t ya’ know.
BTW, did you notice the polar bear in the shadows on the extreme left of the shot? Clearly this was a fore-shadowing of the effects of global warming if the industrial revolution progressed to the level of producing ubiquitous cell phone use.
Sounds like the missing episode of “Lost” … the one that explains the final episode.
What conversation was she trying to hear, given she’s walking alone?
I prefer the time traveling cell phone theory as it demonstrates the 1920s were no more substantive than our own era. 🙂
But I think time traveler is MUCH more of a plausible explanation.
by Nate Silver at NYTimes.
Haven’t read it all (yet) but thought this was a relevant passage in response to the people who have been touting the efficacy of robo-polls over live calling:
Looking forward to the results from the CP/RBI poll on this later today.
In Walla Walla, Washington (which is actually a real place, not just a pop culture reference from the 40s).
How long before some young Democratic woman in Aurora gets assaulted by an angry old teabagger? Are Buck supporters already preparing girl-punching apparatus? Are they searching for steel-toed boots on Craigslist?
I’ve expressed my fear of the hard right turning violent because, for whatever reason, violent people are more attracted to right wing politics. Now that the “wave” is failing to materialize, the teabaggers are venting their desperation. Against women, no less. May I call teabaggers misogynists now?
Someone’s probably going to bring up union violence again, so let me preemptively ask for some MSM coverage of that event. Rightie blogs don’t cut it. (I googled SEIU violence and got not one credible report that these alleged assaults ever took place, so put up or shut up.)
Google Kenneth Gladney. Or search any right of center blog.
Oh, I found hard right blogs. Their stories were supported by other hard right blogs. And guess what their sources were? Hard right blogs!
It’s an urban myth. Get over it.
A Tea Party guy gets a bit rowdy in a confrontation and he’s a thug, but a string of beatings by the SEIU are just urban myths. My gosh you guys are blind. Do some freakin research.
the story would be in a real news source. Simple.
Find me that real news source and I’ll eat my words. Deal?
Like the MSM is going to report anything damaging to the SEIU. It happened; it was documented; get over it. BTW, don’t you think it’s kind of sketchy that the SEIU services the voting machines in Nevada?
Figures.
Surrender accepted.
Everyone participating in a giant conspiracy against teabaggers is a FACT!
1) no report of SEIU assaulters –> media coverup!
2) reports of teabagger assaulters –> media bias!
Again, BJ’s defining characteristic: imperviousness to facts
If the media is reporting on the one Tea Party case of violence but not on the multiple SEIU cases, that’s called BIAS.
– Are female Tea Partiers misogynistic?
– As for the the wave failing to materialize…..if the Rs winning 50+ seats in the House and 7+ in the Senate isn’t wave-y I don’t know what is.
Curious as to what your threshold is? How huge would the R surge have to be to qualify as a ‘wave’?
Sincere question, not being sarcastic Ari.
Merely self-loathing.
(not refering to you Ralphie.)
Hard to beat that ol’ time white liberal guilt when it comes to self-loathin’….
I know a lot of them. In fact, I would bet there are more women than men in the tea party.
Not just the fact that it’s not materializing here, but I lived in Seattle for eight years and I’m quite familiar with Dino Rossi and Patty Murray. In this case, the extremely close polling has probably coupled with Rossi’s twice-failed bids for governor (one of which infamously came to two recounts, the second of which gave it to the Democrat Christine Gregoire by 133 votes, leading to charges that the Democrats in King County stole the election), probably aggravated the assailant and led to the assault.
Nationally, Dems may take it in the shorts. I’m waiting for the final results – I just don’t think it’s going to be that big of a runaway, even now with less than a week to go.
And btw I don’t disagree with you about the penchant for violence on the right. I’ve been worried about the President’s life since Election Day 2 years ago.
All this rhetoric about ‘Second Amendment remedies’ is dangerous talk. I wonder if Sharon Angle will wear a weapon into the well of the Senate when she gets sworn in?
I heard on TV (Matthews?) that women, catholics and independents, who normally vote democratic are trending republican. I can’t cite the source as it was TV. Has anyone else heard this?
I don’t like the trend, but it would confirm my analysis that the abortion/gay focus was going to have a backlash.
I hope so much Wednesday am, that I have egg on my face, instead of real tears.
Dale Peterson is back. And this time he’s defending yard signs with his shotgun. Too bad we can’t have him here in Colorado defending Ken Buck signs.
and Identify where the uninformed, intentionally ignorant Asshole lives.
“git off me larn or I’ll shoot ye”
You do realize that vandalism is a crime, and stealing yard signs is a theft of personal property. The cops can arrest you for it.
I just left them up. A couple strolled by and asked” “What kind of people would do that?”
I answered with the truth: “That’s the kind of people who are supporting Ken Buck.”
Guess who they are voting for?
Who knows what would have happened to her when Buck supporters got done with her?
that Buck wouldn’t prosecute. Buyer’s remorse, you know.
Important factoid:
If she got cut up, she was asking for it.
You should have been in the penalty box at least twice by now and probably banned.
You yawn at misogynistic jokes which involve violence toward women. Figures.
… says the guy who doesn’t think Rand Paul’s goon stomping was a big deal.
The butt of that joke wasn’t the woman. Read it again.
and he keeps calling for me to be banned because I criticize the misogynistic candidate who’s paying him.
Apparently, repeating things makes them true.
Sorry to diary-whore (No PB for that right?) but as the only source for the story is the Paper that dare not mention its name, I assume this can’t be front-paged:
Susan Greene, opinion/lifestyle columnist in The Major Metro Daily has a column today which breaks an important story which is going unreported anywhere else.
The state’s Republican majority Board of Education has applied for an “abstinence only” sex education grant from the federal government. HB1292 passed in 2007
The Board of Ed received approval for their application from Republican Attorney General John Suthers after the government questioned the board’s authority to make the application instead of the Executive branch.
here
Is not the problem.
Expecting to be successful is the problem.
is not pregnancy prevention, it’s indoctrination in righteous living.
Regardless, the story is not so much about the issue, it’s about whether the legislature makes the state’s laws, and the AG’s office enforces them.
It’s not successful.
Hormones beat teaching every time.
It’s not even a choice.
Scientists have discovered a gene for Liberalism.
Covered where else? Fox News!
http://www.foxnews.com/scitech…
named “Liberalism is a Sickness” is gone. (Unless it’s a good election for the ‘pubs, in which case I expect him to show up and gloat.)
Permabanned
along with his sockpuppet
WaWie
I’m sure he’ll be welcome over at Colorado Confluence, however.
He’d be discovered much more quickly than Steve Harvey without his thesaurus.
Still, in the 3+ months I’ve been lurking here, Libertad strikes me as second only to the Beej in his ability to get under peoples’ skin – and thereby keep those eyeballs on the site as advertiser bait…..
There are a number of people who no longer post here as a result of the lunacy.
As you know I’m a bit of a scold on this matter (civility), and may well join the dearly departed you refer to, R.
or we just get tired of being pissed on and leave, the site becomes a complete left wing hackery, and loses its importance.
Pols will be dead in the water in the next few years if it doesn’t shift right.
Reagan raised taxes almost 4% of GDP.
Let’s “shift right” to that.
made of people who want to hear bjwilson explain how the universe was created in six days.
Did you kick him out? If so you gotta give us a diary with the reasons, I am pretty sure we will all end up commenting on it…
He violated the rule that was named after him, was suspended from the site, and continued to use the site afterward under a different user name.
Steve Harvey was banned for less, and many lesser-known users have been banned for the same reason. Violating the rules by itself is treated less harshly than flaunting a suspension with a sockpuppet.
that
Although I’m pretty sure The Blogger Formerly Known as Libertad will find a way and a nomenclature to get himself back on Pols, I’m glad Pols stuck to their guns and tossed him for his blatant terms of use violation.
Why? What happened to your exhortation to civility and your peace offering?
I’m not even a tiny bit in the mood to bicker with you, so you might as well keep doing it on your own.
and snarked at me instead.
As for me (probably you too) I say, let’s be pals! 🙂
My response wasn’t snark. I just have this speech impediment… 😉
about a guy who, even when trying to sound earnest, comes off as sarcastic.
http://www.politico.com/huddle/
Perhaps if Rep. DeGette wanted to be in leadership she should raise more money and do more to help other Democrats. DeGette is sitting on a huge war chest while the Democrats may lose the Majority in the State House and two of her Colorado Congressional colleagues are headed down to defeat. If you want to be a leader Ms. DeGette than act like one
Jared and I are safe – let them eat cake !
For you and Jonathan Allen: Deputy whip is in the leadership.
To be fair, being in a leadership position does not in fact make you a leader.
She’s a Deputy Whip who can’t pass her own pet bill… for some reason.
Actual House aside, leadership doesn’t stop at the Capitol steps. That seat could be put to much better use here at home and, very arguably, in D.C.
I think you missed the point of my post. Tomato, tomato, right?
DeGette has been barnstorming the country for House Democrats, including Betsy Markey.
DeGette campaigning in Ohio:
http://www.cqpolitics.com/wmsp…
In New York:
http://www.syracuse.com/news/i…
Supporting Markey:
http://dianadegette.com/blog/v…
It actually features some of Buck’s positions, which are, you know, important to some people.
that Bennet has three daughters who adore him.
Is it just me, or does that PROVE that Buck hates babies and women?