U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

Governor See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
November 11, 2010 06:47 AM UTC

Dan Maes Speaks!

  • 37 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

On his Facebook page today (must be logged in to read):

Here it is one week after the election and I have yet to compose my thoughts.  I am still reeling from what should of been a Republican victory in the Governor’s race.  It could have been the ultimate unification of the Conservative Revolution and the Republican Institution to take over the Governor’s office, and most likely the Senate seat too, if all would have come around the Republican nominee in August.

The critics said I was not a viable candidate.  The machine, conservative talk radio, the Denver post, and others shone a light on what should have been irrelevent, 20 plus year old events, and turned mole hills into mountains with a clear intent to distract from a positive, well articulated message.  How dare a newcomer have the gaul to actually work hard and deliver a concise and clear message that the people understood and agreed with!  How dare he show up virtually everywhere as if he had cloned himself.  How dare he win an assembly and a primary on pennies with the help of determined, passionate, patriot groups and volunteers!  How dare the grass roots actually think they controlled the process instead of the power brokers calling the shots?!  What to do about Dan Maes and those pesky, uninformed, foolish Tea Partiers?

First, we will have some very powerful and wealthy men sit down with Dan and help him understand that the most honorable thing for Dan to do would be to get out of the race and save the state of Colorado.  He can be a hero to the state if he just steps aside and let’s one of their people in (oops, I mean keep Hickenlooper out of the governor’s chair). He can use his incredible charisma on his supporters and sway them to our guy.  We know he won’t agree to such a meeting outright so we will lead him to think it is a fundraiser and then hit him.  The ole’ bait and switch…

It goes on and on–1,500 words, folks. We don’t want to be too hard on poor Maes, whose political “career” is most certainly over, and is going to have enough trouble making his mortgage payment as it is. But he should have heeded his own warning and, uh, “composed his thoughts.”

Tweet
Share

Comments

37 thoughts on “Dan Maes Speaks!”

  1. He has “gaul”! and incredible charisma!

    I think he’s angling for a tv show.  That other guy who tried the big attention grab for a tv show, …moved to Florida. And almost was prosecuted.  

  2. Every now and then you run across a speech or a statement that just stands on its own and needs no further comment or analysis.

    What an extraordinary statement.

    1. Amaesing Dan just seriously needs to talk – to let it all out.  Problem is he thinks we’re here for his therapy when actually I’m just going to mock and ridicule anything spurting from his 2-finger typing.

      Maybe CO state GOP could put together some  2010 Losers group therapy.  They sure do have enough potential members.

  5. … I mean, David Vitter commits criminal prostitution and gets not only re-elected, but renominated by his party with nary a gripe. Maes, I think, has a point that were he not an upstart, Wadhams & friends would’ve just blasted the attacks on him as “liberal media,” etc., just like GW Bush did in 2000 when he was outed as a drunk driver.

  9. Dan was right about one thing: those ads that Tancredo put up against Maes (the stuff accusing him of stealing from an 83-year-old lady, as if Maes were some downtown mugger) were some of the meanest, most vicious things ever to be run by one candidate against another in Colorado. So here it is, in all its unedited glory (and I don’t think Maes would mind at all, and under the circumstances I believe this merits is an exception to the usual “don’t blockquote” rule, in case Maes pulls down or edits his Facebook entry):

    Second, divide and conquer.  They could not do it with anyone who smelled of a RHINO.  They needed someone who acted like a real conservative, someone who the Tea Partiers would actually believe was one of them.  If they could only find someone who ranted and raved about DC and illegal immigration like they did.  Who could that be??  Enter Tom Tancredo.  He is one of us, right?  He can save the day as Dan Maes could never win.  Why not, because TT said so.  That was good enough, right?  Well, just to make sure Dan could not win we will launch a scorched earth ad campaign full of lies and half truths to destroy his charactor.  We will get Bob Beauprez to say he can’t trust Dan Maes.  We will get Freda Poundstone to twist the truth into a lie.  We will use our long term friends in the conservative talk show arena to manufacture lies and to attack Dan for breathing on any given day.  We will make it look like Tea Parties are abandoning Maes.  We will make it look like elected officials actually supporting Maes pulled their support.  Forget that half of them never supported Dan in the first place.  Dan will not be able to defend himself because we will lock up all the money with a 3- way race.  Big donors will be driven away.  The RGA and others big names will sit on their checkbooks because of the now unwinnable 3-way race.

    Then, we will manufacture some polls to close the deal.  We will beat the grass roots endlessly with polls that make it plausible that TT can win.  Everyone will abandon Dan Maes and vote not on any principles, but on who they think (or who they can trick them into thinking) can actually win.  After all we have tried it over and over again and it should work, right?  Forget that it failed the previous 4 times this decade.  It will work THIS TIME.  After all, we have a real conservative that they can get behind, not some RHINO.  Yeh, that will work, yeh! They will never figure it out this time because we picked a guy that they actually like.  Never mind he broke state laws to change parties.  They won’t care. They will leave every bit of rational thinking they used to get this far on the sidelines.  

    One more thing, just to make sure we win with our candidate from another party, we will relentlessly attack the Maes campaign with ruthless, vulgar, obscene, emails, FB posts, and phone calls, hundreds of them a day.  We will threaten their supporters and volunteers with loss of business and safety.  We will flip off their supporters in their cars even if children are present.  We will flip off their supporters at debates.  The end justifies the means.  We must keep the power away from the grass roots newcomers.  We will drive Maes from the race, steal all of his support and we will win.

    One big mistake folks;  the almost 200,000 voters who recognized Dan Maes was not going to sell out and our resolve to send a message that politics as usual must stop.  Any hopes of continuing the conservative revolution would not lie in selling out to the exact forces that created the machine that is broken but in the few who actually had the courage and integrity to stand on their principles and not sell out.  We understand why many flipped.  You have not been in battle before and when things got tough it was simply easier to flip.  You had not been tested before.  Now you have.  The question is, will you learn from it and know better next time?  Will you have a candidate that will go the distance again?  You better hope so or you have already made the bed for 2012.

    This is not to say that I did not make some mistakes, however; even Bill Armstrong said on talk radio that the mistakes were the result of inexperience and not of bad intent.  Let’s face it, the campaign finance issue would have gone unnoticed completely if not for the malicious intent by another (most likely R) candidate to make me look bad and drain my resources.  The KS and the Freda thing should never got traction if not for the relentless drum beat of self interested talk radio hosts.  The BK was over 20 years ago as well and nothing compared to the financial faux pauxs of my competitors.  Yes, we made some mistakes that were more the result of inexperience, loose lips, and ancient bad judgment rather than a reflection of potentially bad leadership.  I own up to them but will never accept the rational that they made me a bad candidate.

    Now that it is all over the blame game is on.  I hope it is over by the writing of this note.  The power structure will continue to beat the drum that I should have gotten out of the race so the alleged conservative candidate could have won. I say the destruction of all hopes for a conservative win disappeared the day the third party candidate entered the race and the R’s did not support their candidate.  To imply I was at any fault for the results of a split vote reveals the ignorance and arrogance of the power structure and the people that naively followed their manipulative and destructive campaign against me.  It reveals just how much work is left in shaping the Republican Party to be the party of the people, rather than the party of the few elitists and old guard who, once again, caused the loss of the Governor’s and Senate race.  

    The pundits will speculate about the loss of the Senate race.  We can talk about gay rights, abortion, high heels, and women’s issues as the reason for the loss but one can’t overlook the under vote that was the direct result of the candidate pulling his support from his fellow Tea Party candidate for Governor and running to the middle.  It was a gamble that lost.  I said from day one that the people were very clear; they said get on the right and stay on the right.

    So where does this leave us?

    The R’s will certainly have an interesting 2011 when their state central committee meets to select new officers.  That is another subject unto itself.

    I am moving on to another private venture that will merge my entrepreneurial, small business experience with the political world with hopes of guiding and supporting the second half of the conservative revolution in Colorado.  Stay tuned for more on this in the next week or two.  

    Whether I play a leadership role in the second half will be driven by the people.  I will say that it is my opinion that the revolution should continue on its current path and not form other parties.  Finish the task.  Do not get distracted with cerebral plots and second guessing.  You are halfway there.  Finish the job!

    2. he goes from 3rd person to 1st person so easy it’s almost schizo.  Dan better hope Obama’s healthcare kicks in quick to cover his therapy.

      As for this:

      I am moving on to another private venture that will merge my entrepreneurial, small business experience with the political world with hopes of guiding and supporting the second half of the conservative revolution in Colorado.  Stay tuned for more on this in the next week or two.

      Aren’t we all just giddy with anticipation?  

      Can’t wait to see what aMAESing Dan pulls outta his ass this time.  Betcha he has  already updated his revisionist resume to burnish his winning candidacy but not his abject failure in the election.  Keep dreaming Dan!  

    1. Look, Dan Maes was fun — and apparently still is fun– for those of us who could watch all this from the other side of the aisle, but it’s time to put the humor aside and look at what really happened in this race.

      I didn’t agree with a thing the man stood for, but a majority in his party did, and that majority had its will thwarted by a cabal of political and business interests.  Whether Republican or Democrat, no self-respecting politico can simply stand by, with ironic detachment, and chuckle out of a smug sense of superiority.

      The story needs to be told, but more importantly, it needs to be understood so that it can be avoided in the future.

    2. I’m totally fictionalizing this loosely as a political thriller. NYT best sellers list and intrigued dissection of plot points on Politico with table comparing them to 2010 governor’s race, here I come.

  11. Although I agree with much of what Maes has to say about the Republican Party, he is overlooking one crucial point. He backstabbed the Tea Party and Freda Poundstone when he failed to support 60,61 and 101. Dan cut off his base and ultimately lost the campaign. If Dan would have whole heartedly supported the beautiful 3, Colorado would have a Republican Governor and the best fiscal policy in the world.

    Dan, don’t make a commitment with and 83 year old professional lobbyists and then turn on her.  

    1. But, maybe you have to understand Wisconsin, but I totally get the guy.

      Yes, he’s a nut. But every corner bar in the Dairy State is full of them.  And if he had stayed there and run for Gov in Wisconsin, he’d have the job. (And no worse than Walker.)

      1. I represent that remark!

        I was born in Madison, and am related to two governors – one on my dad’s side and one on my mom’s side. The governor from my dad’s side died in office and was succeeded by the guv who was my mom’s cousin.

        The first one was a VERY progressive Republican who served Wisconsin during the dark days of WW2 – proving there used to be such people, even if you can’t see it now from the current crop. I had the opportunity to meet the senator-elect during the summer and thought he was a nitwit. Heaven help the Great State.

        And I won’t even get into the strange saga of Ed Gein, Wisconsin’s most famous nutjob (and who is also a distant cousin).

  13. I have to say I do love how the lefties are trying to spin this as some sort of deep-seated Republican problem.

    We had a jerk of a candidate initially (McInnis), who was ambushed, righteously, by Dems right before the primary, knowing this incandescently asshatted guy Maes would end up as the primary winner.

    Well played, Dems.  

    Mr. Maes?  Time to move on, you are an embarrassment to yourself only.

    BTW, I supported Hick from the get-go, so these aren’t sour grapes.

    1. Both parties have a nasty habit of nominating clowns from time to time.  This cycle, it was clearly the R weakness.

      I’m not talking about ideological differences – I’m talking about convicted criminals, witches, and what have you.

      If the Delaware R’s could have put up a reasonably qualified and reasonable candidate, they would have won.  Likewise several other races that the R’s should could have won.

      I’m not saying being dumb, or perceived as dumb, is necessarily a deal breaker for all candidates.  But most of the time the real loons are not competitive.  

  14. “How dare he show up virtually everywhere as if he had cloned himself.”

    I intend to use that for the next IRS audit of mileage logs — my client cloned himself!  

    I’m starting to like this Tea Party thinkin’!

  15. How dare a newcomer have the gaul to actually work hard and deliver a concise and clear message that the people understood and agreed with!  

     In Tin Foil Danny’s case, I think he has a lot of “gall”

       OK, we all are pretty casual with spelling and grammar when blogging.   But this is all to illustrative of the Tin Foil Man’s off-focus campaign.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

180 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!