U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 13, 2011 10:34 PM UTC

Boyles and Post agree that speculating on a suspect's immigration status is wrong

  • 26 Comments
  • by: Jason Salzman

(Usually I’m bored to death by media covering media stories. But somehow I care more when it’s the media I get.  nice job JS. – promoted by MADCO)

In October, you may recall, Jose Nevarez-Coronado was charged with vehicular homicide in the death of Prof. Yvonne Frye of the Community College of Denver.

On the radio Oct. 8, a couple days after the crash, Peter Boyles, who has little good to say about The Denver Post these days, except about reporter Karen Crummy whom he praises, ripped into the newspaper’s coverage of the crash.

The Post had reported that Nevarez-Coronado had a criminal record showing multiple arrests for theft, and he was on probation for one of them.

Boyles claimed that the suspect, Nevarez-Coronado, “stunk to me” and “used nine different names, three different places of birth, and he has a criminal record that’s really lengthy.”

Boyles went on: “Guess who this guy is, right? Now, The Denver Post isn’t going to tell you who this guy is. The Denver Post actually did an editorial saying Denver is not a sanctuary city. Just Google sanctuary city, and Denver comes up. And they’ve endorsed the sanctuary mayor for governor.  So none of this is surprising.”

But guess what, you Boyles listeners, and there are a lot of you because his program tops the rating charts for Denver radio in the mornings.

Nevarez-Coronado turns out to be an American citizen, born in Albuquerque. He’s not an illegal immigrant. (Boyles’ much-hated Denver Post editorial board got Nevarez-Coronado’s citizenship wrong, too, and posted a correction.)

But the point of this blog post is not to beat up on Boyles for speculating about Nevarez-Coronado, even though his conjecture, and the hateful way he delivers it on the radio, makes me sick personally, and it should make Boyles himself ill because of the hatred this can whip up toward innocent people.

But, putting that aside, the question is, how can this be avoided next time? How can journalists and talk-show hosts like Boyles report or discuss the news and respect Hispanic citizens?

Last week, I asked Post City Editor Dana Coffield what The Post’s policy is on reporting the citizenship status of criminal suspects.

I had noticed that in its coverage of the Aurora Central High shooting in December, it reported repeatedly that the suspect has an ICE hold and is “believed” to be an illegal immigrant, according to police.

Coffield emailed me:

“We only report a person’s immigration status when it becomes part of and material to the public record. If I recall correctly, Aurora PD made a statement regarding the arrest of Luis Guzman-Rincon that included a mention of the ICE hold pending investigation of his immigration status.

The public records databases that we have access to do not let us know whether a person is a U.S. citizen or not (imagine looking yourself up in ACURINT – you get age, name, voter registration, property ownership, licenses, stuff like that, or the criminal records database, which shows charges and disposition.) I know that police have access to more detailed records that may detail immigration status, but they’re not something we’re allowed to look at.”

I asked Coffield if she thought she’d get more information under the new Secure Communities program, which uses fingerprints to determine if a suspect is a known illegal immigrant. Coffield said she didn’t think this would change anything.

Coffield wrote:

“[It seems inappropriate to presume that anyone is NOT a citizen or legal resident of the U.S. When Weld County deputy Sam Brownlee was killed in Evans in November, people were quick to presume Rueben Reyes was not a citizen (and were wrong). Would they have done the same if the assailant was named Jason Salzman, presuming that a shooter by that name was in the country illegally from Austria, or named Peter Boyles, presuming that a shooter by that name was in the country illegally from Ireland (who had intentionally changed his appearance using plastic surgery to evade identification by police… I joke, but…)?”

I asked Boyles if he thinks The Post should speculate about a suspect’s citizenship status, whether he or she is Hispanic or half Polish like me.

He said no. Boyles does not want The Post to speculate.

“What should they report?” I asked Boyles.

“They ought to say that the suspect has given multiple DOBs [dates of birth] and POBs [places of birth],” he answered.

“It’s easily found out,” Boyles said. “You tell us. Those aren’t tough records. People run those records all the time.”

Coffield wrote that if this information is in the public record, The Post will report it, but she added that this type of information is found in the police databases that are not public.

So, a way forward emerges.

I’m hoping that next time a Hispanic suspect is arrested, Boyles will be more humane and refrain from speculating on the person’s immigration status or accusing The Post of deliberately hiding part of that suspect’s criminal record, if it’s not available in public records.

And if Boyles knows details about a suspect’s criminal history that aren’t publicly available, he will tell us where they came from and how he got them and where, specifically, The Post can find them.

Then before bashing The Post, he might ask someone there why something was left out.

Comments

26 thoughts on “Boyles and Post agree that speculating on a suspect’s immigration status is wrong

  1. your last three paragraphs are neatly explained in your sixth.

    That’s as deep as it is.

    Not unlike how the ad I’m looking at in this diary is for criminal records online.  “Was Your Wife a Criminal?”  How did they know??

      1. You and the rest of the media are afraid of boyles, IMHO.  If you criticize him, he will destroy you.  Ask Ritter-Villafuerte and Susan Green.  Ask those poor Patsy Ramsey, ask Shoals, ask anyone boyles has gone after.

        “Don’t argue with someone who buys ink by the barrel” and “don’t argue with someone who controls four hours of radio talk every drive time morning.”

        Name one time when boyles has taken a principled stand…..

  2. and you’ll stop unless they start cleaning up their act.

    Denver talk radio has deteriorated (along with much of the nation’s) but it’s all driven by listeners patronizing advertisers.

    Let KOA’s new Ops Mgr Greg Foster know that you’d like to hear retractions or apologies or whatever for when their “talent” fucks up stories.  

    Let ClearChannel’s advertisers know also.  You hear a local ad dropped in a show and that show continually goes against the grain of your values then let that company know.  It pays to speak up.

    StopBeck.com has been at the forefront of getting over 200 sponsors to pull their $$s from Beckerhead’s shows.  yeah he’s still on but he’s being subsidized by the other Faux properties and good businessmen don’t do charity for nothing.

    You got a voice so use it.    

      1. He’s not making any money for Fox (though of course he’s making money for himself).

        But with no real advertisers, Beck is at the mercy of Ailes and Murdoch. If someday he pisses them off, he’s fired the next day. He serves entirely at their whim, unlike someone like Hannity or O’Reilly who actually makes money for the network.

        1. it’s the 2nd best talk station in New York (which is Beck’s home base).

          You don’t see or hear of them signing new stations to carry his show and advertisers & sponsors are dropping from the fold so if one were to graph it he’s reached his peak and the attraction is now cycling down.

          Fox is a business and they’re laser-focused on the bottom line.  InSanity, O’Reilly, and others are carrying Beck’s dead weight and they’ll be leveraging for more bucks since they have the sponsors so I’m thinking we’re seeing Beck’s fuse burn off to a resounding “dud.”  

  3. First, report nothing that you haven’t checked out thoroughly.

    Second,realize that accessible databases often report arrests only, with no indication of how the case was resolved. So check out each arrest to make sure it’s the guy in question and to find out its disposition.

    Finally, never speculate and never assume.

    These should be basic for the Post. I also realize that without speculation and assumption, Boyles wouldn’t have anything to talk about. So don’t listen to him.

    1. Check, and then check again.

      Good reporters never speculate and never assume.

      There’s been “speculation” and “assumptions” about the Sen. Williams accident. Until the investigation is complete and charge(s) filed (if any) speculation and assumption are just that.  

  4. He just slithered snot-slick into innuendo, code words and lies, as do most righty mouthpieces do since they don’t recognize mere evidence. And you didn’t call him on that, Jason? I just Googled “sanctuary city” and, guess what, “Denver” did not “pop up”. Maybe someone in the Hickenlooper administration forgot to pay Google for first-page placement. Great investigative reporter and media truth teller Boyles should look into that.

    P.S. The Denver Post is as dead to me as KOA (except for the Rockies games!). Anybody can trash it all they want. And P.P.S. Useful media coverage of media is high on my list of likes. Coverage of Boyles until he’s hauled away to the landfill with other garbage is a waste.

    1. P.S. The Denver Post is as dead to me as KOA (except for the Rockies games!).

      Oh, the hate speech!  Please!  You’ll push me over the edge!

      🙂

    2. And yes, you’re right that he didn’t call him an illegal. But he might as well have. It was that close. But in any case, he had no basis for demanding that The Post call him an illegal immigrant.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

77 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!