President (To Win Colorado) See Full Big Line

(D) Kamala Harris

(R) Donald Trump

80%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) V. Archuleta

98%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Marshall Dawson

95%

5%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(D) Adam Frisch

(R) Jeff Hurd

50%

50%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert

(D) Trisha Calvarese

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank

(D) River Gassen

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) John Fabbricatore

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen

(R) Sergei Matveyuk

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(R) Gabe Evans

70%↑

30%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 22, 2011 04:04 PM UTC

Weekend Open Thread

  • 61 Comments
  • by: Colorado Pols

“Most games are lost, not won.”

–Casey Stengel

Comments

61 thoughts on “Weekend Open Thread

  1. According to Dana Milbank

    http://www.washingtonpost.com/

    I hereby pledge that, beginning on Feb. 1, 2011, I will not mention Sarah Palin — in print, online or on television — for one month.

    He calls on his colleagues to join him…

    I challenge columnists Eugene Robinson (33 Palin mentions), Paul Krugman (14), Kathleen Parker (30) and Maureen Dowd (45) to do the same.

    I also call on Keith Olbermann (345 shows mentioning Palin) and Rachel Maddow (183 shows) of MSNBC, as well as Sean Hannity (411 Palin segments) and Bill O’Reilly (664 segments) of Fox News, to take the pledge.

    We can’t seem to get through a BJ-free day.  Any chance we can get through a Palin-free month?

          1. It was your side comment at the end that I replied to.

            Of course, the real test for beej-free days will be when he actually makes some posts here – he’s been blessedly absent…

      1. He might be by later to complain about the salad I will now be serving.

        Bacon whiskey?  I nearly threw up in my mouth a little.

        Don’t get me wrong, it’s brilliant.  Gross, but brilliant.  🙂

          1. mean about bacon. I love the stuff.

            I have, for a long time, jokingly told my family that the words I want as my epitaph are:

                           Here lies Duke

                He had an inordinate fondness

                           for porkbellies.  

  2. Basically, it comes down to awarding promotions randomly.

    The Peter Principle Revisited: A Computational Study (abstract only, subscription required)

    Key conclusion:

    Within a game theory-like approach, we explore different promotion strategies and we find, counterintuitively, that in order to avoid such an effect [the Peter Principle effect- ed. note] the best ways for improving the efficiency of a given organization are either to promote each time an agent at random or to promote randomly the best and the worst members in terms of competence.

    If nothing else, this is more interesting than the anecdotes that are usually touted around here for how to run a business (or government? or schools?).

      1. That the skills required to be good at the entry-level positions are not at all related to the skills required to be good at management.

        So if you take the best person out of the entry-level and put her in management, she’s probably not that good at management and now you’ve made both entry-level and management worse by moving her. On the other hand, promoting someone randomly is likely to be a better result.

        It only sounds unfair because we pay management so much more. If people got paid according to their responsibility or risk of being fired or number of hours worked, I don’t think the idea would seem so offensive. But of course managers tend to have less responsibility, more job security, higher pay, and fewer hours.  

        1. The promote up until someone hits a level they’re not good at. They then move them sideways back to what they were doing. But this requires dual tracks one of which is not management but has the same growth and compensation curve.

          This is why you’ll see titles like senior architect (software), senior scientist (engineering), etc. No management but they are the equivalent of a VP.

          Regardless of mechanism, the trick is to move someone back down or sideways if they aren’t good at the new job.

    1. $1.8 million to compensate for a manual override seems excessive.  If it’s damaging, and this is just a guess, this guy’s so damaged a little more wouldn’t hurt.

        1. In this country, regulations requiring films using animals to have Humane Society monitoring to prevent cruelty would prohibit a scene like this. This would thus harm the small businessman producing the film and either force them out of business or force them to take their production budget and film elsewhere. Hopefully, the 112th Congress will help gut these regulations as they work to streamline government in support of small business and get this country working again.

  3. Topless feminist protesters show what they’re made of

    These are the women of Femen, Ukraine’s topless female protest movement. Young women who believe that the best way to make their voice heard is through sheer bare-chested brazenness.



    On a freezing December morning a bunch of Femen activists stand outside the parliament building. They’re outnumbered by photographers. It’s the day after President Viktor Yanukovych appointed his new cabinet, all of whom are men.

  4. HOW THE LAME DUCK 2010 CONGRESS AND OBAMA’S SZARS SCREWED THE AMERICAN PEPLE

    The article itself contains the usual half-truths and fabrications one expects from the Competitive Enterprise Institute, including this statement:


    there exists enough oil and gas in shale oil formations in Colorado, Utah and Wyoming to completely supply all U.S. needs for several hundred years with current technology and oil prices.  emphasis Twitty

    But truly, the headline rulz.

    http://www.newswithviews.com/C…  

  5. I’m trying to remember a movie I saw a long time ago. I thought it was War & Peace but watched ti (the Henry Fonda/Natile Wood version) and that wasn’t it.

    I remember at the end that there was a quote, I think from Tolstoy, about how if good men would band together for good as evil men do for evil, good would triumph.

    Any ideas???

    thanks – dave

    1. The first is Edmund Burke.  I don’t think this has ever made it into a movie, but a little poetic justice in you thinking it’s Tolstoy if it’s it.

      “When bad men combine, the good must associate; else they will fall, one by one, an unpitied sacrifice in a contemptible struggle.”

      Or, one of my favorites from The Sirens of Titan:

      “There is no reason why good cannot triumph as often as evil. The triumph of anything is a matter of organization. If there are such things as angels, I hope that they are organized along the lines of the Mafia.”

      Good even if wrong.  Good luck finding your lost words!

  6. story in the Denver Post

    What really bothers me about this is I have talked to people at three Colorado software companies who each believe they have a product that could provide the CBMS feature set today. And they can’t even get OIT to take a look at them.

    I understand OIT has an iron-clad requirement that software vendors must hire lobbyists and be based out of state. But couldn’t they make an exception for this one case? After all, saving hundreds of millions and getting our most needful help today is worth a lot.

    1. RESTRICTIONS ON OUTSIDE WEBSITES

      The following news outlets will no longer be quoted at ColoradoPols.com, nor will links be provided to their content. We ask that all Colorado Pols users also follow these guidelines and refrain from referencing or linking to content from these sources:

      MEDIA NEWS GROUP

      The Denver Post

      Sometimes it’s impossible not to reference them, but please try not to link to them. We’re all responsible for adhering to Pols’ fairly simple posting policies.

  7. Anybody care to comment on Ritter’s new job? Looks to me like he was bought off by Pat Stryker in order to let Hickenlooper run, much like the situation where Romanoff was offered a job if he would drop out. Haven’t seen a peep about it over here.

          1. I’d say a few people on a blog. A blog that, due to an unfortunate choice of party and ideology, will gradually lose relevance over the coming years.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

70 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!