U.S. Senate See Full Big Line

(D) J. Hickenlooper*

(R) Somebody

80%

20%

(D) Joe Neguse

(D) Phil Weiser

(D) Jena Griswold

60%

60%

40%↓

Att. General See Full Big Line

(D) M. Dougherty

(D) Alexis King

(D) Brian Mason

40%

40%

30%

Sec. of State See Full Big Line

(D) George Stern

(D) A. Gonzalez

(R) Sheri Davis

40%

40%

30%

State Treasurer See Full Big Line

(D) Brianna Titone

(R) Kevin Grantham

(D) Jerry DiTullio

60%

30%

20%

CO-01 (Denver) See Full Big Line

(D) Diana DeGette*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-02 (Boulder-ish) See Full Big Line

(D) Joe Neguse*

(R) Somebody

90%

2%

CO-03 (West & Southern CO) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Hurd*

(D) Somebody

80%

40%

CO-04 (Northeast-ish Colorado) See Full Big Line

(R) Lauren Boebert*

(D) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-05 (Colorado Springs) See Full Big Line

(R) Jeff Crank*

(D) Somebody

80%

20%

CO-06 (Aurora) See Full Big Line

(D) Jason Crow*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-07 (Jefferson County) See Full Big Line

(D) B. Pettersen*

(R) Somebody

90%

10%

CO-08 (Northern Colo.) See Full Big Line

(R) Gabe Evans*

(D) Yadira Caraveo

(D) Joe Salazar

50%

40%

40%

State Senate Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

80%

20%

State House Majority See Full Big Line

DEMOCRATS

REPUBLICANS

95%

5%

Generic selectors
Exact matches only
Search in title
Search in content
Post Type Selectors
January 25, 2011 10:29 AM UTC

Who Thinks NSTIC is a Good Idea?

  • 5 Comments
  • by: Gypsy Chief

these are scratch notes for a good article I hope to write. Not ready to be promoted yet. Will edit.

National Strategy for Trusted Identities in Cyberspace. Hour and a half Youtube video starts with users who have 123456 as their password. They use the same user name and password on multiple sites. Solution: create NSTIC – govt, private partnership to promote ecommerce so everybody can have more confidence. Why not educate these morons instead? Isn’t it their own fault if they fall for Internet scams?

Opposition from far-right crazy people: Nanny state, camel nose under the tent, starts off voluntary then becomes manditory. Obama destroying America, etc. blogs with horrible spelling and grammar errors, ALL CAPS, etc.

My opposition: 1.) Schmidt is from Microsoft, before that FBI. Microsoft has a horrible track record on security – finally got serious after fortune 500 IT chiefs raised the roof. FBI has had numerous problems with computers, spent tons of money on failed attempts. Ergo – Schmidt isn’t a credible messenger.

2.) Govt is not coming in with clean hands. Consistent track record of inappropriate responses. Item: Real ID / Pass ID. 9/11 terrorists got fake drivers’ licenses. Response: unfunded mandidate to require all states to revamp licenses. Item: Intelligence agencies failed to connect the …s . Response: creation of Dept of Homeland Security. Result: bloated agency that still can’t connect the …s. Item: 9/11 terrorists used knives and box-cutters. Response: TSA takes knitting needles away from grandmothers and proclaims us ‘safer’ this is security theater. Congress abdicates oversight responsibility. Item: Bush adm coerces telcos to spy on citizens. Response: Sen. Obama votes to grant telcomm immunity. Senate ignores compromise by Sen Jeff Bingham [D-NM] which was reasonable. Item: Bush Justice Dept trampled on BOR. Response: Yoo still teaches law at Boalt Hall. Bybee still on 9th Circuit. Nobody gets prosecuted. Item: NSTIC private partners are Silicion Valley. These companies are in favor of open standards when it is in their corporate interest to do so. Microsoft tried to subvert Adobe Portable Document Format – PDF. Microsoft wrote Windows specific addendums to Sun Micro Java programming language. Probable result: a feeding frenzy as big corps try to get a piece of the pie. They donate to campaigns. Item: Comcast / NBCI merger goes through with few consumer protections. Congress is largely silent. Keith Olbermann is first casualty.

Bottom line: opposition to NSTIC must come from other than far-right loonies. We must not let them be the voice of opposition. There are plenty of more reasonable well thought out reasons to oppose NSTIC from a left-libertarian perspective. I want help and input from the group on this.

—- draft only – not ready to promote —–

Comments

5 thoughts on “Who Thinks NSTIC is a Good Idea?

  1. .

    to have smart folks like you and others here to boil down really important issues into small words that I can understand.

    Thanks.

    This looks like it will have impact far beyond what it’s proponents will let on.

    .

      1. in many ways, including electronic data storage and mgmt and e-commerce.  They are always following, not leading, in IT.  

        By the time they boot up their floppy discs and “formulate a strategy” the entire landscape will have changed.  It is developing far to fast for a slow and largely reactive federal government to manage it in any way.

        Interesting thoughts though, Gypsy Chief.

        1. See “World War 3.0: Microsoft and the Justice Department” for a super example of what you are talking about. Even with a totally inept proscution by DOJ a federal appeals court found that Microsoft had acted improperly. J. Edgar Hoover at FBI hated computers. Then when they had to play catchup baseball they hired socalled computer experts who were never able to formulate project specs. “if the sailor doesn’t know which port is the destination then no wind is favorable” – Greek philosopher quoted by JFK.

  2. I think this is one of those areas where the new Progressive-Libertarian alliance of Paul/Nader will find agreement, unless and until it’s done right.

    The pros for NSTIC: we really do need to have a valid infrastructure for trusting individual identities if we ever want to get to the point of being able to sign things electronically.  Today’s identity authentication systems are relatively weak compared to the point we really want to get to.

    The cons: asking the Federal Government to run it is likely to be the first step in having some Congressional genius come up with the idea of removing anonymity from the Internet.  And the Federal Government isn’t exactly overflowing with great examples of ID security.

Leave a Comment

Recent Comments


Posts about

Donald Trump
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Lauren Boebert
SEE MORE

Posts about

Rep. Yadira Caraveo
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado House
SEE MORE

Posts about

Colorado Senate
SEE MORE

116 readers online now

Newsletter

Subscribe to our monthly newsletter to stay in the loop with regular updates!